Appeals Court Lifts Judge’s Order Blocking Trump From Mobilizing Oregon National Guard

I see him abusing his powers daily.

Nothing wrong with my eyesight.
So what statutes has he violated? What Article II authorities has he violated? Assuming all that you say is true for a minute, why is he 20-0 in the SCOTUS on issues advanced by the left?
 
So what statutes has he violated? What Article II authorities has he violated? Assuming all that you say is true for a minute, why is he 20-0 in the SCOTUS on issues advanced by the left?
You do seem to misunderstand what abuse of power means consistently
 
List the abuse.
"The abuse"

Lmao

Here's one - unilaterally bombing boats in international waters.

And if you come back with "but Obama....", then explain how you didn't consider Obama's bombing in Syria to be an abuse of power.
 
"The abuse"

Lmao

Here's one - unilaterally bombing boats in international waters.

And if you come back with "but Obama....", then explain how you didn't consider Obama's bombing in Syria to be an abuse of power.
Was Thomas Jefferson removed from office for deploying U.S. forces against the Barbary Pirates without a formal declaration of war? Of course not, because engaging declared enemies of the United States falls squarely within the President’s Article II authority as Commander in Chief. Even the War Powers Resolution, flawed as it is, concedes that the President may conduct military operations abroad for up to sixty days before notifying Congress. That statute has never been tested before the Supreme Court, and for good reason: it brushes against the constitutional limits of congressional intrusion into executive power. As for the President’s authority to federalize and deploy the National Guard, that question was settled two centuries ago in Martin v. Mott (1827). The Court held that the President’s determination to call up the militia “is conclusive upon all other persons," in other words it non-justiciable. You and your herd of self-anointed scholars might try reading it before lecturing anyone on separation of powers.
 
Was Thomas Jefferson removed from office for deploying U.S. forces against the Barbary Pirates without a formal declaration of war? Of course not, because engaging declared enemies of the United States falls squarely within the President’s Article II authority as Commander in Chief. Even the War Powers Resolution, flawed as it is, concedes that the President may conduct military operations abroad for up to sixty days before notifying Congress. That statute has never been tested before the Supreme Court, and for good reason: it brushes against the constitutional limits of congressional intrusion into executive power. As for the President’s authority to federalize and deploy the National Guard, that question was settled two centuries ago in Martin v. Mott (1827). The Court held that the President’s determination to call up the militia “is conclusive upon all other persons," in other words it non-justiciable. You and your herd of self-anointed scholars might try reading it before lecturing anyone on separation of powers.
Lol.....you're a clown

Unilaterally killing people who would not be put to death in a court of law, outside of the jurisdiction of the country without approval from Congress, outside a time of war.

That's just one.
And you could say that it's legal.....that doesn't mean it's not an abuse of the position
 
Back
Top