Are mary-kate and Ashley Olsen 18 yet

And I always thought, I have seen everything ....

but a countdown until someone becomes legal (that's what the website says) .... that's new to me.
This site is really counting down "until the Olsen Twins are legal" .... so some guys are really looking forward, until the Twins are legal.

O.k. when it comes to posting fake pictures or erotic tales, but still, a countdown seems a little bit too much.

Oh, and by the way: Currently, it's 375 days, so more then 1 year .....
 
Last edited:
Maybe she'll send them Manu's way

Anyone else fear for Laurel's eyes and mind when the timer runs up? Not that anyone can't write a story where the twins are already eighteen. I just imagine a horrible influx of stories concerning those celebrities when that birthday hits.

Just a thought.
 
snooper said:

Who are the Olsen twins? Should I have heard of them?

Michelle Tanner, Full House. And about a dozen crappy straight-to-video movies.
 
Personally, I think the idea of a website "countdown" is pathetic in a most hilarious way. Like men aren't frantically masturbating with images of these two already.

But my question is this: How are these two girls different than any other bimbos on the beach in So Cal? (Where I live, btw) I mean, they look just like any other blonde 16 year olds at any number of high schools around the US. What makes these two so special? Is it the twin aspect? "Celebrity" (used very loosely) status? What gives?

Actually, I think a much better story would be that the world of men anxiously awaits these two's 18th birthday - only to discover that they've developed a severe case of acne and gained 70 pounds. Now that would make a good humor story!

Disclaimer: the above paragraph is not a "dig" at women with acne or who are overweight. Rather, the humorous aspect, for me anyway, would be in how the men who lust for these girls would react to a sudden change in their appearance that would no longer set them up as the extremely typical and stereotypical Southern California blonde beach bunnies.



Edited because I can't type for shit today!
 
@ flawed_ethics

my opinion, about underaged celebs is: you can write a story about them, even now. But don't send it in, until the 18th birthday.
Just look at the current case of the Olsen Twins: It's a little bit more then 1 year, until they are legal. Someone could write a story about them, right now. Then, give it some time, read it again ... let it ripe .... and once the Olsen Twins are legal, the story could be very good - and it could be posted on Lit, without a problem.



SexyChele said:
But my question is this: How are these two girls different than any other bimbos on the beach in So Cal? (Where I live, btw) I mean, they look just like any other blonde 16 year olds at any number of high schools around the US. What makes these two so special? Is it the twin aspect? "Celebrity" (used very loosely) status? What gives?

well, I can't tell you exactly what is so special about the Olsen Twins.
But one thing could be: they are "public". I mean, go to a beach (in Cali ?) and take a long look at some 16 year old blond teenage girls. Maybe you even take some photos of this beach teens .... and then, the Cops will take some photos of you, wearing handcuffs - and the judge will call you a molester ....
But every guy can buy a magazine or a video tape starring the Olsen Twins.

@GoodLilPet
Yeah, I once looked at imdb.com (movie database) and I saw that they already made a truckload full of "Mary-Kate & Ashley .... " movies, like for examle "You're Invited to Mary-Kate & Ashley's Birthday Party"

Now, I once mentioned this in an older Olsen Twin thread, but I have to mention this again: Imagine, a movie called "You're Invited to Mary-Kate & Ashley's gang bang Party".

Or, to make as much money as possible: "You're Invited to Mary-Kate & Ashley's defloration". Just think what could be written on the back of the cover "It's the 18th birthday of the Olsen Twins. They are nice, they are cute - and they are both virgins - but by the end of this videotape, both girls will no longer be virgins."

This could be something for a story idea. The Olsen Twins need money, so they plan a special movie, for adults: so once they are 18, they do a movie about their first sex ... so the story could tell how they film everything ....

Disclaimer: of course I know that the Olsen Twins are just 16. All the stuff mentioned above is ment for once they become legal ....
 
and posts like that are why Lit has a strict policy.
 
both.

by which I don't want to make this personal. I have always appreciated your willingness to take any idea ant shake it to find new angles. You asre very clever and I would love to see yuou write more stories.

I would just hate to see Lit forced to go AVS because of sexual suggestuions regarding minors. Just not worth it.
 
[
SexyChele said:
Personally, I think the idea of a website "countdown" is pathetic in a most hilarious way. Like men aren't frantically masturbating with images of these two already.

But my question is this: How are these two girls different than any other bimbos on the beach in So Cal? (Where I live, btw) I mean, they look just like any other blonde 16 year olds at any number of high schools around the US. What makes these two so special? Is it the twin aspect? "Celebrity" (used very loosely) status? What gives?



okay even though their movies are indeed crappy these twins are the most independently wealthy teens in hollywood not only have their parents alledgedly let them keep the majority of their income(which incidently spreads from their debut on Full house which still reruns to this day they also have movies books dolls a failed t.v show (2 of a kind that also reruns to this day) and a current t.v show which is in it's second season) and now a shoe and clothing line at wal mart plus a plethra of crappy cd's and video games and perfume+hair stuff ) but there was also a law passed sometime in the early 90's stating that 20% of a child celebs earnings from each check goes to a trust fund to be turned over to said celb. at the age of 18 (this was to stop greedy parents from exploting the children and spending all the money)which means each one of these "average blonde beauties are worth at least 17 millon $ each as well as they head a company which manufactures all this stuff and has a net worth of 80 millon $ (which means if they liqudated each girl nets at 57 millon) not bad huh.
Not only that america has watched them grow up from the chubby cheeked little kids on full house to the busty blonde bueaties we see today plus there's two of them . they're rich they're pretty and they're forbidden enough said
sorry for the rant :kiss:
 
Last edited:
Identification

GoodLilPet said:
Michelle Tanner, Full House. And about a dozen crappy straight-to-video movies.
Thanks for the information.

Unfortunately I have never heard of Michelle Tanner, or Full House and I don't watch films, on video or in the cinema (or on TV come to that).

<Departs in utter shame, back to his retreat high in the Welsh Valleys>
 
Re: Identification

snooper said:
Unfortunately I have never heard of Michelle Tanner, or Full House and I don't watch films, on video or in the cinema (or on TV come to that).

Good for you. One should be careful with what garbage one puts inside ones brain.
 
destinie21 said:
okay even though their movies are indeed crappy these twins are the most independently wealthy teens in hollywood not only have their parents alledgedly let them keep the majority of their income(which incidently spreads from their debut on Full house which still reruns to this day they also have movies books dolls a failed t.v show (2 of a kind that also reruns to this day) and a current t.v show which is in it's second season) and now a shoe and clothing line at wal mart plus a plethra of crappy cd's and video games and perfume+hair stuff ) but there was also a law passed sometime in the early 90's stating that 20% of a child celebs earnings from each check goes to a trust fund to be turned over to said celb. at the age of 18 (this was to stop greedy parents from exploting the children and spending all the money)which means each one of these "average blonde beauties are worth at least 17 millon $ each as well as they head a company which manufactures all this stuff and has a net worth of 80 millon $ (which means if they liqudated each girl nets at 57 millon) not bad huh.
Not only that america has watched them grow up from the chubby cheeked little kids on full house to the busty blonde bueaties we see today plus there's two of them . they're rich they're pretty and they're forbidden enough said
sorry for the rant :kiss:



You never have to apologize for a "rant" - you simply explained why you like these two. Sorry, I still don't get it. They are rich. And??? There are actually other young women in the US who are even wealthier. This is a quality to lust over some one? Guess wealth just hasn't been all that important on the sexiness scale for me.

But, regardless of their wealth, you say the twins are "busty"? Huh?? Have you seen pictures of these two little darlings? "Busty" is last term I would use to describe them.

It's interesting you say "forbidden". Actually, they are only forbidden to those men more than 5 years their senior. I know. I work in Children Protection Services in a county in California. If a girl is under 18, but over 14, and the boy is within 5 years of her age, no prosecution takes place if sexual activity was consentual. Of course, there is another story there: twins turn 18, everyone thinks they are virgins, only to discover they gave it up years before. (Of course, not for publication on Lit!)

*sigh* Sorry, I simply don't get the attraction. You do - that's fine. I hope you enjoy your fantasy and find that in just over a year's time there are enough stories that hit Lit to make you one happy camper for quite some time.
 
I am not speaking for myself, but: I guess many guys are turned on, by the innocent look.
I mean I haven't seen that much of them, but whenever I see them, they are dressed "normal".

Now think about someone like Britney Spears. Back in their first video (Hit me Baby ....), she had some "sexy" outfits, even though she was just 17 (I think, don't blame me if the age is wrong).

Same with the Tatu Girls. In their first video, they are dressed very sexy, "Lolita" Style. - I think, the Olsen Twins are the opposite, they are more down to earth, not so "slutty"
 
I must say I don't fully get it either, except my assumptions that all guys are secretly pervs, so, regardless of the law or Lit policy, guys have looked at therse public figures becoming increasingly nubile for so long that the anticipation factor figures in.

Or, it might be the twins thing. THAT I 'get', but don't get,in that I find no rational basis for it.

These two just annoy me. I suspect its because I found Full House so plastic. Or that they are packaged as such plasticized marketing icons. Give me imperfection any day.
 
The Olsen Twins are valued at around £150 million each and have recently been voted 61st in the FHM sexiest 100 women.....Why do men like the Olsen twins??....well, they are highly attractive fraternal twins , who are worth hundreds of millions and are very famous and it is impossible to go anywhere without seeing an olsen twins CD player/ hair gel/PC game/Cd/video etc.

There is also the fact that they dont come across as cheap hoes, and quite possibly have brains despite being blonde.
 
jimmygc said:
The Olsen Twins are valued at around £150 million each and have recently been voted 61st in the FHM sexiest 100 women.....Why do men like the Olsen twins??....well, they are highly attractive fraternal twins , who are worth hundreds of millions and are very famous and it is impossible to go anywhere without seeing an olsen twins CD player/ hair gel/PC game/Cd/video etc.

There is also the fact that they dont come across as cheap hoes, and quite possibly have brains despite being blonde.


Don't mean to single ya out, but there are quite a few loaded statements in here.

1. And this might be a question for another forum - are men truly attracted to a woman who is wealthy? Is that some form of aphrodisiac? I ask this because this is the second time this item has been mentioned. I know a lot of men think women consider a man's financial status before deciding whether or not to go to bed with them, but do men do the same with women?

2. I rarely - if ever - see anything to do with the Olsen twins outside of this place. I've never seen a CD or hair product or PC game or whatever. Oh, wait. The other night when this discussion first started, I noticed one of their movies was listed in the guide. I read a book instead. I think I got the better entertainment value.

3. I would tread very carefully regarding the blonde statement if I were you. The idea that blondes are brainless is just tacky and simply not true. (And this coming from a natural redhead) Whether or not these two have brains is not dependent on the color or their hair. And if anyone regards accumulation of wealth despite obvious lack of talent a measure of intelligence, I would say these two have done quite well.

Hmmm....appears I've gone way off topic. Sorry! This is my last comment here. I don't get it with these two, but if men like 'em, well, okay. That's cool. Whatever is there thing.
 
I think that he fact that they have accumulated vast wealth despite obvious lack of talent is a sign of their intellignece. They must have at least a thread of intelligence to be able to go to directors and sell themselves on their looks and not thier acting talent....and to got back to the original thread question - yes thye are legal in the UK, but not in the US
 
re:eek:lsen 2

I tink the real reason these two are so popular(as far as the countdown and fantasy stories) is because even though as mentioned above they are very very rich thay still somehow seem attainable.Of course they are not talented nor are the majority of most young actors and actresses or even pop stars in Hollywood.Case in point Britney Spears ,she's okay as a singer but really does anyone truley believe that she would be so very famous if she was lets say 50 pounds heavier and had bad skin and teeth? the main reason she's famous is because like any good marketable celeb she's got mass appeal and as a bonus the body and moves of a stripper. I personally don't think she's hot (meaning I wouldn't have sex with her but can I understand why some might.)

now in response to sexychele

SexyChele said:
1. And this might be a question for another forum - are men truly attracted to a woman who is wealthy? Is that some form of aphrodisiac? I ask this because this is the second time this item has been mentioned. I know a lot of men think women consider a man's financial status before deciding whether or not to go to bed with them, but do men do the same with women?

2. I rarely - if ever - see anything to do with the Olsen twins outside of this place. I've never seen a CD or hair product or PC game or whatever. Oh, wait. The other night when this discussion first started, I noticed one of their movies was listed in the guide. I read a book instead. I think I got the better entertainment value.


in response to question 1 I don't know about men (I'm actually a woman). and I can only speak for myself, when it comes to money I have to say it's not one of the factors I consider to determine if I will sleep with someone but it is an added bonus like finding your favorite jeans after they've been lost and then finding a 20 in the pocket. also as mentioned above even with all the money they seem normal.

As for question 2 maybe you haven't seen it but it's out there in mass amounts . But unless you are between the ages of 10-30 , or actually play video games or subscribe to teen or mens mags then as a female you may not know. As for the entertainment value,I think we can all safely say there is none but just like money doesn't come into play niether does their acting ability or lack there of.:kiss:
 
i suppose to see their appeal you have to be a guy, or a pre-teen child ot who shows like 2 of a kind and so little time probbly appeal.
As for the money thing, i don't think money is a good basis for a relationship and i agree with destinie21 that money in the case of the olsens is just an added bonus to a nice package.
I also agree that their popularity has something to do with the whole idea of attainability. Britney doesnt come across as being attainable, whereas the Olsens dont come across with the same aura of "youre not famous, youre not good enough" that you get with Britney and Christina etc.
 
Last edited:
Well they made it!

The countdown has officially ended.

From jailbait to billionaires, happy birthday Olsen Twins.
(Now no more movies, ok?)
 
Back
Top