Day in the Life of Joe Middle-Class Republican

Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Harry Reid was taking Abramov money and writing the same letters on behalf of Indians, but ABC goes after Hastart to protect William Jefferson. They are acting Imperially in Congress. How dare you arrest us when we commit crimes; how dare you get a warrant and search us. How dare you stop a congresswoman and you will take your slapdown. How dare you try to breathalize a drunken COngressman who claims to be on his way to a vote at 3AM???


How dare you question what the President was doing with an intern in his office? I did not have sexual relations with that woman..(fingers crossed)...
 
It is absolutely rediculous that we go to war with any goal other than the subdual or destruction of an enemy by whatever means are available. The quickest way to end a war is the right one, nukes aside due to obviuos enviromental issues. The only fights worth fighting are the ones worth winning. In Iraq you have to options, the same two we had in Nam. Pull out and let them sort it out themselves and whatever solution they come to is the right one. Start killing until they surrender, do whatever it takes to get every last one of the terrorists. They need to either be dead, imprisoned or atleast surrendered. I can accept a cease fire in most situations. It is utterly rediculous that we think otherwise and we are only able to sustain such lunacy in small conflicts. Nam wasn't a small conflict but from what I've read the laws were also largely ignored during it.
 
Joaquin1975 said:
Settle down. Have some ramon, coffee and listen to Mike Malloy with me.

Great fun.


;) ;) The tired, old rhetoric from when I was a kid just hit me the wrong way...

Right now I'm watching a black guy breakdance to surfer music.

Some things are just WRONG!
 
poony said:
atrocities yes, but what most of what Kerry and the Winter Soliders said happen did not.

I wasn't referring to them. I was referring to this:

No one that has serve this great Country should be treated that way.

I think it's a dangerous blanket statement.
 
poony said:
atrocities yes, but what most of what Kerry and the Winter Soliders said happen did not..


How do you know what was commited? In Vietnam and at any war time you do not know what the soliders went through. Women would put a bomb in with their baby and set it off near soliders. Is that right?

Its brutal. But its war they were doing what they felt it took to maintain their freedom. I personally think that it is disgusting to sacrifice a baby in anyway but I still respect somebody who is willing to go that far to kill me. I'm just going to take whatever means I have available to me to defend myself.
 
Rioght yer majesty, grab my ankles, take it, and keep voting for you...

Riaght-O guv!

;)

We don't get fooled again...
No, no, no!
 
RoryN said:
I wasn't referring to them. I was referring to this:



I think it's a dangerous blanket statement.

It is a dangerous blanket statement. Though I think that most American Military and most Americans in general would argue that if you committed soemthing that is a true attrocity, in our eyes not the eyes of the "victims" that they did our nation a dis service and shouldn't even be associated with those who have honorably served.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
;) ;) The tired, old rhetoric from when I was a kid just hit me the wrong way...

Right now I'm watching a black guy breakdance to surfer music.

Some things are just WRONG!

Just go with the flow. The taste of dehydrated veggies take your mind away from the madness.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Rioght yer majesty, grab my ankles, take it, and keep voting for you...

Riaght-O guv!

;)

We don't get fooled again...
No, no, no!

They do porn now?
 
phrodeau said:
Terrorists can surrender? That would be news.

Even if it will never happen it is possible. The only problem is that there is nobody to blame for their actions. Particularly not if you believe as I do that terrorists are evil, not misunderstood. I don't believe that strategically bombing a city out of existance would soften the hearts of the terrorists. And I mean out of existance, not what we did in Fallujah I mean level the city and make sure that not a single thing is left alive. I don't think it would have a positive effect, if anything it would drive more to join their cause at this point.
 
Joaquin1975 said:
Just go with the flow. The taste of dehydrated veggies take your mind away from the madness.

Ramon is good. I also just saw an Orthidox Jew slam his face into the floor.

It's supposed to be entertainment...
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Ramon is good. I also just saw an Orthidox Jew slam his face into the floor.

It's supposed to be entertainment...

Why? Did you trip the guy?

Meanie.

Oh Mike Malloy is calling Bush "chucklenuts" again. Fun.
 
RoryN said:
I wasn't referring to them. I was referring to this:



I think it's a dangerous blanket statement.


Ok..sorry...
 
Frog Princess is watching "So You Think You Can Dance" between hail storms.

Some of this stuff is over the top, and some is sooooooooooooooo bad...

Reality TV RULZ!!!
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Frog Princess is watching "So You Think You Can Dance" between hail storms.

Some of this stuff is over the top, and some is sooooooooooooooo bad...

Reality TV RULZ!!!


My eight year old son is watching Conspiracy Theory Thursday on Discovery Channel. I think I have a weird kid..
 
There's no such thing as a weird kid; just parents that got trapped in a cubicle of some sort or another...

;) ;)
 
Byron In Exile said:
I was never a union member, but my father was. He put in a lot of time with no compensation because he believed the union was necessary for the industry to survive, and for the workers' protection.

So I learned, at an early age, that a counter to Management Without Limits is a good thing. The problem now is that without international standards, big business can play one nation against the other to get what it wants. The US can have protections for workers, and clean air standards, and the rest of it. Fine. Companies can manufacture stuff in China, then, where none of that applies.
You know, I've been saying that exact same thing for over a year now. Maybe if a white guy says it it'll get listened to... or at least Fawkin' Injun can't call you a n*gger :)
 
Kerry served 3 months on a boat. He saw not one instance of rape. He saw no genocide. He saw no torture. Then he testified to Congress in 1971 (based on things he was told) that such things were common.

I was in country much longer than Kerry. Such things were not common. But the effect of Kerry's testimony was to help tarnish an entire generation of veterans.

It was not until the hostages were liberated from Iran and came home to a huge public welcome that America woke up and realized that it had never welcomed home its Vietnam veterans.

Jimmy Carter pardoned draft evaders, but did nothing for veterans. Neither Carter nor Reagan (or any president) attended the 1982 dedication of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, which had to be privately funded.
 
landslider2000 said:
Kerry served 3 months on a boat. He saw not one instance of rape. He saw no genocide. He saw no torture. Then he testified to Congress in 1971 (based on things he was told) that such things were common.

I was in country much longer than Kerry. Such things were not common. But the effect of Kerry's testimony was to help tarnish an entire generation of veterans.

It was not until the hostages were liberated from Iran and came home to a huge public welcome that America woke up and realized that it had never welcomed home its Vietnam veterans.

Jimmy Carter pardoned draft evaders, but did nothing for veterans. Neither Carter nor Reagan (or any president) attended the 1982 dedication of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, which had to be privately funded.
A very good friend of mine's brother fought for years to get the wall built in Philly. He was the president of the committee and a vet. It was a battle, but they finally got it done.
 
Byron In Exile said:
I was never a union member, but my father was. He put in a lot of time with no compensation because he believed the union was necessary for the industry to survive, and for the workers' protection.

So I learned, at an early age, that a counter to Management Without Limits is a good thing. The problem now is that without international standards, big business can play one nation against the other to get what it wants. The US can have protections for workers, and clean air standards, and the rest of it. Fine. Companies can manufacture stuff in China, then, where none of that applies.
After 8 yrs. in the navy, my father returned from the war(WWII) and joined the union. When he got older and let the liquor run his life he only worked a few weeks a year and sat on his ass bugging the shit out of my mom while he collected unemployment.
 
poony said:
What you do not say is that the car is Japanese because the US car makers can not compete because they have to price their cars higher because they have to pay Union employees that do not work for the company anymore. More than half of every money made on the car goes to the retired employee. Because a liberal demanded it...

Union had there place at one time but any more they take advantage of their power.

And you did not mention that a Liberal wants raise your taxes to benefit the man or woman who does not want to work..they decide hey I can stay on welfare and let the hard working woman and men pay my way.
The car is Japanese because the Japanese built up loyalty by building cheap cars that get good mileage. It's not like the Japanese don't have unions or lifetime employment.

Yes, because welfare recipients are living sooo high on the hog that they see no need to actively look for work.
 
Sean Renaud said:
It is absolutely rediculous that we go to war with any goal other than the subdual or destruction of an enemy by whatever means are available. The quickest way to end a war is the right one, nukes aside due to obviuos enviromental issues. The only fights worth fighting are the ones worth winning. In Iraq you have to options, the same two we had in Nam. Pull out and let them sort it out themselves and whatever solution they come to is the right one. Start killing until they surrender, do whatever it takes to get every last one of the terrorists. They need to either be dead, imprisoned or atleast surrendered. I can accept a cease fire in most situations. It is utterly rediculous that we think otherwise and we are only able to sustain such lunacy in small conflicts. Nam wasn't a small conflict but from what I've read the laws were also largely ignored during it.
Sir, your arguments will carry more weight once you have learned to spell.
 
Back
Top