Kirkrapine
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2018
- Posts
- 5,538
impeachment talk is premature.
At what point would it mature?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
impeachment talk is premature.
At what point would it mature?
It's a witch hunt!
Once the new Congress has had a chanes to call witnesses to testify uner oath and the special counsel concludes their investigation
It seems at this point that Mueller will never conclude his investigation!![]()
It seems at this point that Mueller will never conclude his investigation!![]()
It seems at this point that Mueller will never conclude his investigation!![]()
As long as Trump is still standing, he is never going to finish. He knows his greatest contribution to the effort to undo the election is the constant fog of investigation.
I've just shut politics out of my life because no one is talking about any legislation that makes a difference in your, my or anyone else's life. It's just destroy the Trump family 24/7...
The biggest mistake is to think that political argument (or discourse of any kind) on
the general board, is a representation of anything normal.
As long as Trump is still standing, he is never going to finish. He knows his greatest contribution to the effort to undo the election is the constant fog of investigation.
I've just shut politics out of my life because no one is talking about any legislation that makes a difference in your, my or anyone else's life. It's just destroy the Trump family 24/7...
The biggest mistake is to think that political argument (or discourse of any kind) on
the general board, is a representation of anything normal.
Did I even mention the board?
WhiteWater was around eight years. Iran-Contra was six years. Benghazi was 4 years ... This thing is in its early-ish stages, relatively, and already has produced more results than most. I do not believe the new congress is going to mess around. Hearings will be convened quickly and I'd imagine that the unindicted co-conspirator's family and confidants are next. So you have a bit of a wait before the unindicted co-conspirator himself is at bat.
https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/59428b9d688ad25f008b48b8-750-605.png
That chart gets posted every once in awhile and you don't understand the significance in it.
Look at the different investigations. Not just the length, but the purpose of the investigations.
Notice how the SHORT ONES were all investigations into crimes we actually had evidence for?
Supposedly at the beginning of Mueller's appointment we had evidence of "Russian Collusion" to rig the election for Trump. If that was the case, why are we still investigating? It should have been a slam dunk short investigation like the Watergate investigation. Which, BTW, Trump gets tagged with being similar to quite often. IF his offense was so "watergate-ish" WHY THE HELL is Mueller still investigating after all this time?
Answer: Because he's got nothing and he's off in the weeds pursuing process crimes against bit players.
And you don't understand that. Which is why you post that chart in order to justify why he's taking so long to find what everyone was saying we already had proof of.
I fully understand the significance of it. You clearly do not. Muller is NOT "taking so long to find what everyone was saying we already had proof of (sic)"
The relative brevity of the Mueller investigation and the guilty verdicts, pleas and indictments to date should have you reconsidering your comments.
Mueller was appointed to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election.Mueller's investigation, combined with the pre-appointment investigation, are already at the average length of time for these types of investigations.
Note how the investigations for offenses which there was evidence, are short. And that investigations for which there is no evidence of the original offense are long.
Also, note that Mueller's appointment was for an offense everyone "knew" the evidence was obvious, blatant, and easily obtainable. Yet, here we are at the average length of time for ALL special counsel investigations, long and short.
Basically, at this point Muller has gone beyond the time needed to find evidence of the crimes which everyone already "knew" and "had evidence of" occurring. He's entering the zone for investigations which DO NOT result in evidence being found for the original appointment's purpose.
It's a subtle distinction, but you missed it completely. There's another one in there too and you're not catching that one either.
Mueller was appointed to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election.
No less a personage than the President claimed that the evidence was far from obvious. "It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs four hundred pounds, OK?
This.What interference?
Now go look it up.(edited)
Also, note that Mueller's appointment was for an offense everyone "knew" the evidence was obvious, blatant, and easily obtainable.
Mueller's investigation, combined with the pre-appointment investigation, are already at the average length of time for these types of investigations.
Note how the investigations for offenses which there was evidence, are short. And that investigations for which there is no evidence of the original offense are long.
Also, note that Mueller's appointment was for an offense everyone "knew" the evidence was obvious, blatant, and easily obtainable. Yet, here we are at the average length of time for ALL special counsel investigations, long and short.
Basically, at this point Muller has gone beyond the time needed to find evidence of the crimes which everyone already "knew" and "had evidence of" occurring. He's entering the zone for investigations which DO NOT result in evidence being found for the original appointment's purpose.
It's a subtle distinction, but you missed it completely. There's another one in there too and you're not catching that one either.
This.
Now go look it up.
As long as Trump is still standing, he is never going to finish. He knows his greatest contribution to the effort to undo the election is the constant fog of investigation.
I've just shut politics out of my life because no one is talking about any legislation that makes a difference in your, my or anyone else's life. It's just destroy the Trump family 24/7...
If the government of the United States is, indeed, "of the people, by the people, for the people," then intentionally lying to the American people must logically be at least as egregious a federal misdemeanor as lying to Congress or government investigators is. And, of course, "misdemeanors" are constitutional cause for impeaching a President. I felt the same way when Nixon stared straight into the TV camera and maliciously lied to the American people, as I did when Clinton did the same, and as I do now as Trump continues to lie to the American people virtually every day, it seems.
I offer there's nothing better that can be done for the constitutional health of this country than for the Democrats to be drawing up legitimate articles of impeachment as I post, and for the new Democrat-majority House of Representatives to levy those articles as its initial order of business when it first convenes on January 3, 2019. And then the Democrat's second order of business should be to propose an Article of Amendment to the Constitution to repeal the 2nd by modifying constitutional arms rights to more reflect current public opinion.
Again, I don't believe any other two bare suggestions could possibly, positively rectify more the current direction this country continues to move toward.