Biggs_Darklighter
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2019
- Posts
- 5,159
Clinton by a mile.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Top notch reading skills you have there, sporto.
PLEASE QUOTE from your linky the part that says that Trump is a convicted sex offender.
In the alternative, PLEASE QUOTE the part in your linky that says that Trump's being impeached for being a sex offender.
Otherwise, STFU and stop being nothing more than a boring partisan idjit.
luk was an Epstein Massage Boi???
Given how divisive the Question is, you should expect divisive Answers.
Clinton was fined, sued, paid settlements, suspended then resigned from law practice in arkansas, barred from the Supreme Court, impeached before the house, etc. for his sexual misdeeds.
Trump paid off 2 or more former lovers to not air their intimate relationships, which the lying cunts did anyway.
No comparison.
Clinton is a proven sexcrim.
Trump is the subject of gossip.

You know that Algo is dragging her butt along the carpet right now like a dog with an malfunctioning anal gland, right?![]()
Smart ass. Has Hillary ever been accused of sexual misconduct?![]()
I don't know what's more disgusting, Epstein, or people like the OP who are using Epstein for their own partisan politics?
It was not adultery. Start with Troopergate.
He used Arkansas State Troopers to drag women to see him under false pretenses where he would then pull a Harvey Weinstein on them.
He has been quite credibly accused of forcible rape.
The impeachment was not because the most powerful man in the world created a hostile workplace in the oval office fir a young woman who had zero powerband by the Thomas hearing standards cannot give consent...the impeachment was not about that. It was not even about him lying about "I did not have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky. It was not about Hillary attacking Lewinsky as a lying stalker.
It was about him covering it up. He asked her to lie. He had his personal secretary obstruct justice and try to get gifts back. He had his pal Vernon Jordan obstruct justice by buying her silemcebwith a very lucrative job at Revlon. It wasn't the blowjob(s) or the commiting perjury under oath, it was because he actively obstructed justice. The perjury was the layup, so they took the layup.
He had a predatory pattern of getting women alone and exposing himself. We know the women are credible not just because believe all women (unless it's a femocrat) we know because he has Peyronie's disease and Slick Willie's winkie curves to the side.
His campaign strategist James Carville famously said about one of the women who accused him that "You drag a hunnert dollah bill through a trailer pawk and you nevah know what you gwine find." Hillary Clinton put it ALL on the women referring to scandal after scandal as "bimbo eruptions"
Of all the human beings on the planet that Epstein tried to curry favor with by providing social interactions, there is not a chance in hell that Bill Clinton did not participate. It fits his MO of having women brought to him.
I don't necessarily see Trump turning anything down either however Trump has the self image of being a ladies man and being able to go out there and get it for himself. He likes to be seen in public surrounded by women and he likes to be seen out there trying to pick up women. Different M.O.
After Kavenaugh, which was straight bullshit on top of bullshit on too of ancient not just uncorroborated but corroboration denied juvenile, drunjen, non-penetrative accusations, no one will care if he did. The Dems shot their wad on this subject.
They were loaded for bear with Trump in 2015 because Hillary, who was HORRIBLE to women was going to run as women's salvation. This was to get the monkey of Bill's predations off her back, and her history of demeaning victims overlooked. She is on tape LAUGHING about lying to get a natural rspist off as a defense lawyer. No shame in doing her job, but she was gleeful about it. She is Rory-level ghoulish.
Jesus, Que, you had me at the beginning before you lost your shit there in the middle defending Trump. Because that means I now have to question everything you said.
Seriously, learn to talk like a human person. Like I would have believed what you said if you hadn't tried to defend Trump. I'd even believe that somebody would defend their husband over their accusors, because people in relationships get trapped in a horrible mindet sometimes, a "I know him and he wouldn't do that" experience over evidence logical fallacy.
But then you had to inform me that you were probably lying by defending Trump and belittling the investigation against a known rapist who BRAGS about being a rapist. So now, even though the rest of it makes sense, I HAVE to question it. Do you see how your life would be better if you learned how to communicate? Like you were so close.
At the end of the day, without evidence, an allegation is just that - an allegation. In America, it’s due process, a presumption of innocence until proven guilty - not guilty until proven innocent. Important note here: Congress went through impeachment proceedings and all with Clinton. The Democrats have yet to start impeachment proceedings against Trump with a Democrat controlled House.
You paint a good picture, but a million allegations without a single conviction doesn’t make anyone guilty.
PLEASE QUOTE from your linky the part that says that Trump is a convicted sex offender.
In the alternative, PLEASE QUOTE the part in your linky that says that Trump's being impeached for being a sex offender.
Otherwise, STFU and stop being nothing more than a boring partisan idjit.
You know that Algo is dragging her butt along the carpet right now like a dog with an malfunctioning anal gland, right?![]()
I'm gonna be real- I was a literal infant and no one has actually told me what Bill Clinton did. Something about cumming on a dress and a cigar.
When I try to research it, all the first-hand sources of the time talk about adultery, which makes me think if there was actual sexual misconduct, it was covered up in the 90s for whatever reason. This is exacerbated by the claims I've seen that he might be involved in this sex trafficking ring that's just now coming to light. And if that's true, hang um both.
I don't think there should be a "Who was worse" because that belittles sexual predators. That feeds into a "he wasn't as bad as he could have been, so it's ok". "Not as bad as Trump" is not the fucking standard. And we don't need to make it the standard. We don't need to keep this bar lowered.
I'm not saying Bill Clinton is a rapist, I'm saying I don't really know because he doesn't go around bragging about it like Trump does. But if he is, "Not as bad as Trump" is not an excuse. It doesn't make it ok. And framing it like that has the potential to plant that mindset.
You have the most ridiculously fucked up and moronic sayings, vette.![]()

This is what always outs him.
Nobody else talks like that. Vette has always talked like that. Like some dated dude from the '60s trying to impress his peers with what he thinks is biting wit.![]()
I disagree. Naturally, it’s all bad, but there are levels, right or wrong, just look at our legal system. There is a difference between sexual harassment, sexual assault, sexual battery and rape. Of course, if Clinton is a rapist no one would be saying he’s not as bad as Trump.
Oddly (not really) enough, in this very thread people are lying about Clinton’s actions to paint the picture they want.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ty-DROPS-case-casting-doubt-truth-claims.html