A few questions.

[Wondering_Newb]

Yeah I think all that can be said has been said aswell, if anything I can take this discussion further on forum x or y since it is turning more into a conspiracy theory discussion or network security etc.


Thanks for everyone ones again for taking their time.

 

[Lady_Prowless]

Hello. I got redirected to this forum since people told me I would get much better information and from much more expirienced people than on the last forum. So here goes:

I'm not sure what I am... I know I like sensual bondage and romantic settings and perhaps sometimes watching pictures about a level or two more unusuall things turns me on but there are a few things I <can't> understand.

Now why would anyone willingly like to submit themselfs to "financial domination" seriously... what is the point? If you want to waste your money, and submit yourself to a waste of your financial resources why not put your name on a Red Cross donation list with a 3-4 numbers high digit.

Why would anyone like to submit themselfs to fulltime slavery threw a contract.If she or he now wants to be dominate for a surtain amount of time (like lifetime) then they could just let their mistress or master dominate them as long as they wanted (and if they want, their whole life). Or maybe I've missed some paragraphs <Grins>... about what a slave contract is.(No I have not viewed one but I have read about them a litle).

3rd, if you visit such internetpages, dungeons, meetings about bondage/domination and/or sadism. Does the FBI (as example, for it is the most known) in some speciall "list".

Last and finall.

Is Blackmailing legal? No it's not... How can some "mistress's/(Masters?)" be doing it then without getting in jail? It's crazy godamit. The whole CONCEPT of blackmailing a person who is devoted to you just to keep his or her devotion is proof of your own weakness.. I really can't understand that.

id like to find someone who would let me "financially dominate"them...i think that label is called "Sugar Daddy"heehee

 

[catalina_francisco]

LOL, this article popped up on Yahoo News tonight which I think answers the question directly of whether the US has people under surveillance without the proper authorisation or respect for privacy...and the admission straight from the President's mouth, not just speculation and suspicion of press or public.

Interesting quotes from the report : "Since October 2001, the super-secret National Security Agency has eavesdropped on the international phone calls and e-mails of people inside the United States without court-approved warrants.'

"Often appearing angry in an eight-minute address, the president made clear he has no intention of halting his authorizations of the monitoring activities and said public disclosure of the program by the news media had endangered Americans."

James Bamford, author of two books on the NSA, said the program could be problematic because it bypasses a special court set up by the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to authorize eavesdropping on suspected terrorists.

"I didn't hear him specify any legal right, except his right as president, which in a democracy doesn't make much sense," Bamford said in an interview. "Today, what Bush said is he went around the law, which is a violation of the law — which is illegal." '

"Government officials have refused to provide details, including defining the standards used to establish such a link or saying how many people are being monitored."


This Washington Post report about the FBI porn squad may also be of interest to the original question included in this thread, especially in relation to these parts :""Based on a review of past successful cases in a variety of jurisdictions," the memo said, the best odds of conviction come with pornography that "includes bestiality, urination, defecation, as well as sadistic and masochistic behavior." No word on the universe of other kinks that helps make porn a multibillion-dollar industry." (note porn based on urination and also SM are mentioned which are practiced by many on this board).......and "The new squad will divert eight agents, a supervisor and assorted support staff to gather evidence against "manufacturers and purveyors" of pornography -- not the kind exploiting children, but the kind that depicts, and is marketed to, consenting adults."

Catalina

 

[greenmands]

Catalina, I agree. I've known for years that the USA is not a true democracy. The media and other forms of communication are manipulated to mold 'public opinion'. I realized back in the late 1960's that this had become a fascist state.

 

[catalina_francisco]

Just more evidence of how we are all being watched in this latest experiment . They say in the UK, there is one camera to very 14 people....that is scary and certainly removes any thoughts of privacy.

Catalina