A girl's preference - cut or uncut

Cut or Uncut

  • Cut

    Votes: 52 57.1%
  • Uncut

    Votes: 39 42.9%

  • Total voters
    91
I need to come on here and say how much I love and value my Lit friends. Thank you, gals and guys! When the dust of a rant has settled, I hope I'm still ... appealing as you folks are to me.:rose:



You're sexy even when you're ranting. ;)

It makes me giggle, actually.
 
I need to come on here and say how much I love and value my Lit friends. Thank you, gals and guys! When the dust of a rant has settled, I hope I'm still ... appealing as you folks are to me.:rose:

I still like you, rants and all (not sure about Green_Knight)
Nothing wrong with expressing opinions:)
 
Is it hard?
Is it throbbing?
Is it dripping pre-cum?
Is it pointing in my direction?
Is it clean?
Does is smell good?
Does it taste good?
Can I touch it?
Can I put it in my mouth?
Can I sit on it?
Is it attached to a man I really like and is he planning on using it to make me come like a freight train?

I've never experienced an intact cock, but I can't imagine that if all the questions above can be answered 'yes,' that it would even occur to me to care one way or the other.
Exactly!
I prefer a cock. A nice cock. See above.:D
I need to come on here and say how much I love and value my Lit friends. Thank you, gals and guys! When the dust of a rant has settled, I hope I'm still ... appealing as you folks are to me.:rose:

It turned me on... see my earlier post. ;)
Come here and show us some love... :kiss:
 
I have had sex with a total of three men in my life. I also saw a couple of others when the circumstances did not result in sexual intercourse. All happened to be cut. However, it was not an issue that had to be discussed before he ended up exposed to me. While I stated my preference, I doubt very much that being uncut would have changed what happened once I saw his penis.

The barbaric practice of removing a girl's clitoris is pretty much the same as removing a boy's penis.

Please note the soap and water comments by other women on female cleanliness, and note about using anything to clean inside my vagina. It is designed to keep itself clean and healthy with proper care.
 
Last edited:
I'm cut, and there's not a damn thing I can do about it. Do I wish I hadn't been? Maybe, but it is what it is, and I don't think there's been any emotional scarring as a result.

Female circumcision is a completely different matter, not even the same context. Yes, that is a horrible, emotional and debilitating event for a young girl.

A completely different matter? It depends - in many ways the effect may be very similar, so we shouldn't try to play down MGM in that way. Any form of genital mutilation is barbaric and normally unnecessary. And don't forget, the prime reason that male circumcision became so popular in America and Europe from the late 19th century onwards was to reduce sensitivity and thereby discourage masturbation. That is also one of the reasons given in support of FGM, so there is no difference there. The reduction in the woman's ability to orgasm during sex - it makes no difference if she herself or her partner has suffered GM, it seems.

In FGM, in its minimum form the clit head is either nicked or removed, leaving part of the external structure under the hood. What remains still has a lot of nerves (probably as many as in any penis and a lot more than in the circumcised penis) and appears to be capable of giving a clitoral orgasm. What is not known with these types of FGM, and what is not known with MGM, is what effect the resulting reduction of sensitivity has on the quality of the orgasm. This is mainly because there is no way of defining and measuring that quality. Presumably a brain scan during orgasm could give some kind of measurement of orgasmic effect but without before and after comparisons of the same individual, the results may not be useful.

What we do know is that women who have the hoods of their clit trimmed or removed initially experience massive sensitivity as the normally-covered clit is exposed but then they suffer a deadening effect as a result of keratinisation; the loss of sensation can make it difficult to have a clitoral orgasm. Men suffer similar keratinisation as a result of circumcision and in theory there would be similar loss of sensitivity though without the complete loss of orgasmic ability. Of course, in the case of a man who suffers from premature ejaculation this loss of sensitivity may be a positive thing.

The proponents of the entire removal of the external parts of the clitoris claim that, as with male circumcision, the ability to have sex and to procreate is not affected and, to that extent, MGM and FGM are the same in their effects. That can hardly be disputed but those proponents also claim that even though the woman cannot have a clitoral orgasm, she can still have a vaginal or anal orgasm and get pleasure from sex. This is much more open to doubt and would probably vary from woman to woman in any case.

Ironically, the worst form of FGM - infibulation - can sometimes turn out to be the most benign. It seems that some FGM practitioners, when they seal up the woman's outer labia during infibulation, leave everything intact underneath and, in such cases, doctors have had some success in reversing the process and restoring orgasmic ability. Similarly, some men have had foreskin reconstruction, with varying success.

Apart from these few exceptions, as you say, what is done is done - for both men and women - but that doesn't mean that we should accept MGM and FGM and allow them to continue. Yes, it will take a long and no doubt bitter fight to overcome stupid prejudices and traditions and win this one, but it has to be won. The removal of the clitoris ceased to be a routine medical procedure in America and Europe by the later 20th century, so there is hope, and hopefully, your generation of men will be the last in the 'western world' to suffer MGM.
 
I still like you, rants and all (not sure about Green_Knight)
Nothing wrong with expressing opinions:)

It's ok, the feeling's mutual.

I'm more concerned about exposing the myths, lies and barbarities of FGM and MGM than with being liked. Being nice to people never won battles.
 
I have to say that I think my preference for the intact penis has something to do with the fact that I'm personally against circumcision. It was a huge problem when me and my ex when I told him that I would never circumcise my sons as his mom was Jewish and he claimed to be as well. (only practiced when it suited him) In my family as far as I know all the boys are intact, as is my only son. As for it not being a big deal let me tell you about one of my prenatal appointments when I was in the next room while a circumcision was being performed. There was this little molded tray that they strapped the baby into while they cut him and they didn't numb him because apparently they don't have feeling there. (yeah right) That baby was newborn, already crying about being naked strapped in a plastic contraption, but you could tell as soon as they started because it sounded like he was being flayed alive. I'll never forget that experience, it makes me shudder just thinking about it. That being said I would never judge a man because he was cut because he didn't make that decision, and if I cared about him and the sex was good it really wouldn't matter to me. I do think if anything happened with my husband and I ended up with a circumcised man I would miss playing with the foreskin and watching it retract as he got excited, and the extra girth.
 
To add to the anti-circumcision argument, I'll bust another myth: that somehow babies and in this case, boys, don't feel pain. I mean how fuck up is this idea that because a baby can't verbalise pain, much less disagree with"tradition", that it is OK to lop a bit off your child?
Does it hurt? A friend of mine at school had a medical reason for being circumcised when he was thirteen and he gave a pretty graphic account of how painful it was and how long the "mild discomfort" lasted. He had analgesics painkillers for two weeks and couldn't take part in any sport for another two months.
So... it's OK to do this?
Fucking mad
 
I need to come on here and say how much I love and value my Lit friends. Thank you, gals and guys! When the dust of a rant has settled, I hope I'm still ... appealing as you folks are to me.:rose:

Fuck yes, you are!
 
Uncut. That's how I came into this world and how I intend to leave it. Cut seems so un-natural.
 
From a girl's point of view, since we are handling the darn thing, what is your preference for your man - circumcised of not?
After voting please explain the reason for your choice if you have one:)

Doesn't matter. At all. Love both!
 
I'm not a girl but as a bi guy, to me a cock is a cock is a cock. As long as it shoots cum up my ass and down my throat it makes me happy!
 
It doesn’t make a huge difference to me. Aesthetically, I prefer circumcised. The majority of guys I’ve been with have been cut. There wasn’t anything wrong with the couple uncut ones I’ve been with, just personal preference would be cut, if I could choose.
 
Back
Top