PatCarrington
fingering the buttons
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2004
- Posts
- 1,624
WickedEve said:Please do so. I haven't been properly amused this morning.
wanna wrestle?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WickedEve said:Please do so. I haven't been properly amused this morning.
Yes! Oh, all that grabbing and touching and the bruises. Ohhhhh...PatCarrington said:wanna wrestle?
Well... they were nice. A little lumpy. And what was that fuzzy thing I found in the center of one?flyguy69 said:What? I made you pancakes!
WickedEve said:Yes! Oh, all that grabbing and touching and the bruises. Ohhhhh...
You're going to poke her in the eye?PatCarrington said:we'll take care of the first person pronoun once and for all.....
....in very unpoetic ways.
Funny boy!flyguy69 said:You're going to poke her in the eye?
Maybe you'd like to lick the beater.WickedEve said:Well... they were nice. A little lumpy. And what was that fuzzy thing I found in the center of one?
I'm afraid your beater would get turned on and my tongue would end up tangled in it.flyguy69 said:Maybe you'd like to lick the beater.
Well, my edges are starting to curl so I must be done! Gotta go: I have lots of sins to atone for.WickedEve said:I'm afraid your beater would get turned on and my tongue would end up tangled in it.
(oh god, we're having pancake sex!)
flyguy69 said:Well, my edges are starting to curl so I must be done! Gotta go: I have lots of sins to atone for.
PatCarrington said:we'll take care of the first person pronoun once and for all.....
....in very unpoetic ways.
annaswirls said:My goodness I sleep late and we are licking beaters and wrestling?
Without a chaperone and without the whipped topping!
PatCarrington said:join in.
i bet you know some wicked wrestling moves.
annaswirls said:hmm might as well, I have not eaten breakfast yet, and you all look so tasty this morning
and plenty of butter~PatCarrington said:bring the syrup.
Trent_Dutch said:I just don't like 'poets' (and I use that term loosely) who think that their emotions, their experience, their existence, is/are more powerful, stronger, richer, more poetic than ordinary peoples... they/it isn't. Its exactly (the fucking) same, for audience and writer alike. Or at least it should be. Maybe that's one of the reasons why modern poetry is so poorly read. The audience (i.e. EVERYONE) is disillusioned/frightened by a Poets 'holier/better' than thou attitude. The notion that most poets have, that their own emotional experience is something special and unique in the grand theme of things, is a grossly incorrect one. And it can be quite offensive in my own humble opinion. Aswell as feeding fevered egos it only serves to profelate the "widespread popular notion that gaseous emotionalizing is exclusively identical with what we call poetry". Which it isn't. Alot of the time when I am reading poetry I just wish poets would stop feeling and start thinking for a minute.
This is not a dig at XXplorher... it really is just a general statement of my opinions about modern poetry (I said once I wouldn't get opinionated, but I've changed my mind).