Bramblethorn
Sleep-deprived
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2012
- Posts
- 17,606
I've definitely been reactive here, for something that's probably quite petty in many eyes. I am instantly triggered when someone doesn't demonstrate they can separate opinion out from fact, and as I found their comments sweeping and not specifically stating it as opinion, that's what took me.
I think when reading any feedback it's generally best to take an "in my opinion" as read if at all possible*. It saves on typing for the feedback-giver and annoyance for the recipient.
While I didn't and don't necessarily find their comment constructive (critical yes, a little confusing in parts and basically a list of what they don't like (but hey, maybe i'm wrong!)). I didn't ask for constructive, did I. I just said i hate when people give a low review and don't say why. This person said why. They literally did what I asked
We may be talking at cross purposes here; what are you looking for when you say "constructive"?
To me, constructive criticism means that it offers specific, actionable advice for how something could be improved (as the critic sees it). "I hated this" is unconstructive, because it doesn't give any indication of what the author could've done different; "I hated this because your heroine had small tits and I only like stories about big tits" is constructive, even if it might not be advice worth taking. In that light, "a list of what they don't like" can be constructive criticism, if it's specific enough to show what to avoid.
*except when people tell me my stories are good, those are universal truth