Best current guidance on Literotica and AI

[EmilyMiller]

You can't? But why?? Do better, Emily, honestly.

Yeah - I’ll get on to that

 

[EmilyMiller]

I just read Part 4 of your story. I was wondering if maybe your writing was dry and that was flagging it, but nah, that's definitely not it.

You do have kind of a pulp fictiony prose, where the focus seemed to be on being simple and direct---which is great. It's nearly invisible and let the story itself be the star.

You had minimal transitions. Despite being blunt, the sentences flowed perfectly from one to the next. But when your narrator's reflecting, you add in a touch of flowery spice.

Some of the action beats seemed to be doing a few things at once, too, which is not easy, and certainly not the kind of subtext that AI can recreate.

So it's definitely not you.

Is this a published or a rejected story?

 

[lustychimera]

Is this a published or a rejected story?

Published. Last one they posted.

 

[EmilyMiller]

Part 4 was the only one to not be rejected across the 5 parts

And @lustychimera so maybe not the best place to look for evidence of AI

 

[lustychimera]

And @lustychimera so maybe not the best place to look for evidence of AI

Figures. Dude's got 4 stories and I just happened to pick the wrong one.

 

[EmilyMiller]

For some context, this is what my rejections look like

Part 1 - No AI Rejection. Part 1 was pulled for AI after being published for 2 months before being reinstated.
Part 2 - 1 AI Rejection, the story was posted after a resubmission with a note attached. This part has been pulled twice since it was published initially but was reposted along with Part 1 after the second time it was pulled from the site.
Part 3 - 4 AI Rejections across a month, published on the fifth attempt with some small changes
Part 4 - No AI Rejection
Part 5 - 6 AI Rejections.

I think that you have to face up to having just been a bad penguin in a previous life, hun.

Emily

 

[EmilyMiller]

I've had the same thought. Someone is getting revenge on me for something I've done xD

Emily

 

[MillieDynamite]

Portly was a thin penguin in that life, with a roving eye for other penguin's hens, who he fucked and fucked and laughed at the cucked penguins in public.

I think that you have to face up to having just been a bad penguin in a previous life, hun.

Emily

 

[StillStunned]

Portly was a thin penguin in that life, with a roving eye for other penguin's hens, who he fucked and fucked and laughed at the cucked penguins in public.

I think Portly was the kind of penguin who didn't fertilise any eggs, so when all the other male penguins were standing stoically in the Antarctic blizzards for months on end to keep their eggs warm, he was off boinking the female penguins.

And the other males knew it. Just watch a nature documentary: you can tell from their body language. There's a collective curse of millions of penguins resting on Portly's soul.

 

[EmilyMiller]

@StillStunned @MillieDynamite & @Portly_Penguin I think you guys have invented a new category: penguin tales (tails).

Emily

 

[EmilyMiller]

Now the question is, how do I pay back the karma?

I believe the currency here is nude [but still feathered] selfies

Emily

 

[MillieDynamite]

Oh, look, EM, his wittle tale is wiggling.

I believe the currency here is nude [but still feathered] selfies

Emily

 

[StillStunned]

@StillStunned @MillieDynamite & @Portly_Penguin I think you guys have invented a new category: penguin tales (tails).

Emily

I can't even begin to imagine how penguin sex works. It probably involves a lot of "Sorry, it's just very cold."

 

[EmilyMiller]

I can't even begin to imagine how penguin sex works. It probably involves a lot of "Sorry, it's just very cold."

Cloacas same as their dinosaur antecedents

Emily

 

[EmilyMiller]

@Portly_Penguin you may not be able to publish, but view yourself as successfully passing your thread derailment entrance exam.

Emily

 

[StillStunned]

Cloacas same as their dinosaur antecedents

Emily

I assumed that, but then how would I make a joke?

 

[samhasstories]

View attachment 2329660

Ah-HA! You ARE computer generated!

 

[ShelbyDawn57]

Cloacas same as their dinosaur antecedents

Emily

OK. My nerd card may be in question, but I had to look that up. I'm not quite as disturbed by that little hole in my knowledge base as I was by the article that contained it:

Antarctic Seals Keep Trying to Have Sex With Penguins

 

[StillStunned]

Antarctic Seals Keep Trying to Have Sex With Penguins

I imagine this happens around pub closing time.

 

[EmilyMiller]

I assumed that, but then how would I make a joke?

You can take the ND girl out of science, but…

Emily (who never ever takes things too literally)

 

[EmilyMiller]

OK. My nerd card may be in question, but I had to look that up. I'm not quite as disturbed by that little hole in my knowledge base as I was by the article that contained it:

Antarctic Seals Keep Trying to Have Sex With Penguins

Animals are often assholes, particularly the human ones

Emily

 

[KeithD]

I posted this on an AI thread and it was suggested I add it as a stand-alone post. One which might get pinned by @AH_Mod or @Laurel (assuming they agree with the contents).

I have edited it slightly to make it more coherent as a stand-alone message.

March 2024

—

1. AI submissions are a big problem for the site. There are a lot of them.

Your subsequent points seem to acknowledge that this might not be true. The preponderance of AI rejections may not be AI writing at all. I don't see why running the story through Garmmarly and taking some of the change suggestions is really AI. It's not much different from the time-old process of putting it through a human editor and taking some of the change suggestions.

I think the problem remains an overreach on identifying what is too AI to be called someone's work or to be accepted into the file here.

 

[ShelbyDawn57]

My favourite bit of the article is the casual mention of seals killing and eating the penguin What I've learnt is to stay away from the seals

pretty damned sure I'm taking fucking a seal of my bucket list.

 

[EmilyMiller]

Your subsequent points seem to acknowledge that this might not be true. The preponderance of AI rejections may not be AI writing at all. I don't see why running the story through Garmmarly and taking some of the change suggestions is really AI. It's not much different from the time-old process of putting it through a human editor and taking some of the change suggestions.

I think the problem remains an overreach on identifying what is too AI to be called someone's work.

To clarify. Behind the scenes Grammarly is using GAI (and existing published work) to come up with those suggestions. This is not always advertized to users.

from the horses mouth - not that Laurel is a horse (maybe a graceful female centaur). So no, not inconsistent.

Emily

 

[EmilyMiller]

My favourite bit of the article is the casual mention of seals killing and eating the penguin What I've learnt is to stay away from the seals

Dolphins are just as bad. As for orca…?

Emily