ShelbyDawn57
Fae Princess
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
- Posts
- 2,446
On your first block, I got 0% AiI tested it on this passage (60 words):
Its verdict: 51% human-generated content. Bit surprising since it's from a novel published in 1859.
Then I tried on a slightly longer version (185 words):
Same site now says: 90% human-generated content.
Then again, on the whole of Chapter 1 (1001 words): 99% human-generated content.
(If the first 60 words are only 51% human-generated, is it even possible for the first 1001 words to be 99% human-generated? That doesn't seem to add up.)
Then I tested it on this passage, generated by ChatGPT in response to the prompt "Write about going to the supermarket, in the style of Charles Dickens":
That site says: 68% human-generated. The correct answer would be more like 3%, given my 12-word prompt vs. the 364 words that GPT produced. A few other examples with text generated by GPT from simple prompts scored around 70%, better than poor old Charles Dickens' famous opening line.
These "AI detectors" are scams. They may do slightly better than a magic 8-ball, but not so much better that one should be trusting them for anything, let alone trying to guess how to earn their good opinion.
Second block, 45% AI which I found odd, and the last, larger block of text, I got 97% AI.
I used gptzero to test.
I guess some are "better" than others.
EDIT: Added quotes to hopefully indicate intended sarcasm.
Last edited: