Bestiality = ?

[ElectricBlue]

I did PM Laurel, weeks ago, and I have yet to receive a reply.

I get that this is Laurel's site. I get that she calls the shots as to what gets published. What I don't get is why, when a writer asks a legitimate question on a "discussion board" the answer, after first expunging the author's argument which describes the problem simply because it mentions the problem, is "because we say so." That's supposed to encourage discussion?

"Because I say so" may have to be sufficient when you ask your mother why you can't have a cookie before dinner, but I must admit that I find it less than satisfying on a "discussion" board for writers.

Nevertheless, I cannot dispute the answer's veracity. As Murray Hamilton said in "The Hustler," "My house; my game."

By the way, I am well aware of my options with respect to other sites. Frankly, the reply seemed a bit dismissive and condescending.

I think the point people are trying to make is that any discussion on the matter, whilst it might be entertaining (or, fuck me, here we go again, when will it ever stop?), is academic and futile. None of us here have the power to change things with regard to Lit content policies. The editorial control isn't some kind of "we should cater for everyone" democratic enclave, it's the whim, likes and dislikes of one person, the site's owner - who makes decisions, I imagine, with an eye on the bigger picture.

Sure, we can all have an opinion on the matter, but the sensible amongst us also have the wisdom to know when things ain't going to change any time soon, and move on.

You've got the answer (which wasn't what you wanted, but as Mick and the boys said, "You can't always get what you want") so you might as well take the horse's corpse back to the stables, coz it's a well and truly dead one.

Save your energy for things you can influence, not things beyond your control. Or in your case, finding another site that will accept your content.

 

[bronzeage]

The simplest way to put this is, a human can fantasize about sex with a fantasy dog that is actually a sentient being, capable of making an informed choice, but cannot fantasize about sex with a real dog.

 

[Pocketshaver]

I did PM Laurel, weeks ago, and I have yet to receive a reply.

I get that this is Laurel's site. I get that she calls the shots as to what gets published. What I don't get is why, when a writer asks a legitimate question on a "discussion board" the answer, after first expunging the author's argument which describes the problem simply because it mentions the problem, is "because we say so." That's supposed to encourage discussion?

"Because I say so" may have to be sufficient when you ask your mother why you can't have a cookie before dinner, but I must admit that I find it less than satisfying on a "discussion" board for writers.

Nevertheless, I cannot dispute the answer's veracity. As Murray Hamilton said in "The Hustler," "My house; my game."

By the way, I am well aware of my options with respect to other sites. Frankly, the reply seemed a bit dismissive and condescending.

the reason that you got those answers, is that they most likely don't want to anger the all power EDITOR who gets to APPROVE or DENY their next submission.

People have been eaten in stories here. Its normally done by magical monsters and shit like that. Dragon eating someone? fine and dandy. Zombie? were wolve monster? yep fine.
Per Lit guidelines:
Underage discussion not allowed

 

[KeithD]

Bullshit. I don't write or read that type of story and so I don't care whether or not it passes here, nor do I have any interest in researching what applies and what doesn't. It has nothing to do with angering Laurel or not. I'm happy to let her decide what story of this nature she wants to accept and doesn't. It can be posted here or not as far as I'm concerned. I've just noted that the OP seems clueless on having already gotten the answers being sought.

 

[_Lynn_]

the reason that you got those answers, is that they most likely don't want to anger the all power EDITOR who gets to APPROVE or DENY their next submission.

People have been eaten in stories here. Its normally done by magical monsters and shit like that. Dragon eating someone? fine and dandy. Zombie? were wolve monster? yep fine.

The only editor is Laurel. So she is powerful.

 

[Dutchboy51]

For what it's worth I had zero intention of causing a fuss. All I wanted to do was open a discussion about a completely harmless fantasy. No need to get snippy. I GET IT.

In the words of the late, great poet Leonard Cohen " I thank you. I thank you for doing your duty you keepers of truth, you guardians of beauty. Your vision was right. My vision was wrong. I'm sorry for staining the air with my song."

Keep up the good work. Best of luck to all.

 

[KeithD]

The basic problem is that topics the Web site doesn't accept in its stories aren't acceptable in board discussions either--and have gotten people banned for being in discussions about them. Bestiality is one of those. You can't really discuss where the edges of acceptability are other than what is clearly permitted without being beyond acceptability in the discussion.

 

[Dutchboy51]

Joseph Heller wrote an entire book about the argument you just made.

 

[KeithD]

I get it; you just refuse to get it. That's fine with me. It's your funeral. You're the one not getting your petulant way here.

 

[MarieWriter]

give it up- she does have the right to say "because i said so" if she wants... It's her site.

 

[Hypoxia]

Morph your underage humans into thinking adult banana slugs before they're devoured. That worked for me.

 

[Dutchboy51]

Hold on. Who said anything about underage humans? Not me, morphed or otherwise.

This is a short thread. Take two minutes to go back and re-read it. Never once did I question Laurel's right to publish or not publish whatever she pleased. In fact I specifically confirmed her right to do so more than once and complimented her on the site.

All I did was attempt to make an argument in favor of my position, which I now realize is also against the site rules, hence the Heller reference for those of you who read as well as write. Now I'm being "petulant" and on the way to my funeral? Man, you guys play rough, way, way too rough for me.

Next to my name on the left it says "virgin." Funny, after this experience I sure don't fell like one.

That's a simile.

 

[Dutchboy51]

Oh yeah. I forgot to say "Up yours, KeithD."

 

[shewantsmore]

Theres no point in arguing just finish the idea and let it go,

 

[KeithD]

Hold on. Who said anything about underage humans? Not me, morphed or otherwise.

As far as I can determine only you have. Who else on the thread has said anything about underage humans?

Sorry you didn't get the response from me you wanted. You asked and I took the time to answer, and I'm pretty sure I gave you the correct answers. Luckily, it remains your problem, not mine. I don't write or read that material.

 

[Hypoxia]

Who else on the thread has said anything about underage humans?

Me. I offered Big Banana as an example of skirting all the prohibitions in one shot.

Meanwhile, there's this: Horse wanker arrested twice in a day. He wanked ON the horses; he didn't wank them directly, apparently; so, no bestial contact. Merely that famed British reserve. "During a police interview he told detectives: ‘I was sat on a bench. I was feeling sexy so I started to…’" And so it goes. Only another wank-off.

 

[Dutchboy51]

Well, I've about shot my bolt on this topic. I will stay far, far away from transgressing the site rules from now on. It was never my intention to push the site's envelope in the first place. It took me a while and multiple re-writes to discover the extent of that invisible envelope. Despite what some of the respondents to this thread may think, I am perfectly capable of accepting Literotica's prohibitions and herein publish my intention to do so.

I realize that my writing is not for everyone. I also realize that my fantasies are completely benign, like most fantasies. All creatures mentioned in any of my stories are completely fantastic. They don't exist anywhere, except in my own mind.

I have re-read my own works. There is not a single example of any characters having sex with animals, real or imagined. Sex with animals doesn't float my boat at all.

I write because I enjoy the act of writing. My stories are designed to titillate, not offend. For those who have been offended, I apologize, genuinely. If I submit another story for publication, I will stick to more acceptable story lines wound around my best interpretation of acceptable site behavior. That means NO VORE of any kind. Nevertheless, I stand firm behind my assertion that I have never published, nor have I sought to have published any story in which humans have sex with animals. That fantasy does nothing whatsoever for me.

Is it permissible for me to request that any readers who know of sites where sexually oriented vore fantasies can be published contact me by PM? A google search has yielded minimal results.

Literotica is a great site. I am not taking my bat, ball and glove and storming off the diamond petulantly or otherwise. I have written a number of well-received, although not universally, stories in the Mind Control and Non-consent/Reluctance sections. I can do that again, should my muse drop in to speak to me.

I wish nothing but good things to all involved at Literotica- readers, writers and editors. Keep up the good work. That includes you, KeithD.

 

[SimonDoom]

You did mention you wanted to try something in every category, but are you going for every micro-niche there is? Still, those penguins, they've given you the taste for fur and feathers, I can see that .

When I get my claws into something, I don't let go easily. Especially where deviance is concerned.

But you knew that already.

 

[ElectricBlue]

When I get my claws into something, I don't let go easily. Especially where deviance is concerned.

But you knew that already.

But we're still waiting for Simon in every category. How long is this grand plan of yours going to take? I mean, I did every category in about 5000 words, so it's not hard .






EB stands back and waits for a reaction...

 

[SimonDoom]

But we're still waiting for Simon in every category. How long is this grand plan of yours going to take? I mean, I did every category in about 5000 words, so it's not hard .






EB stands back and waits for a reaction...

At the current rate it's going to take . . . a while. So sit back and enjoy the popcorn. I'm not going to wrap it up in a single 5,000 word story. Although, I must say, the idea of writing a story that covers every single category is somewhat appealing, as an artistic exercise if nothing else.

 

[Hypoxia]

...those penguins, they've given you the taste for fur and feathers, I can see that .

Adult humans visiting a zoo (maybe in New Zealand) are struck by a mystic thunderbolt that morphs them into horny adolescent penguins, some queer. Everything follows from there.

 

[ElectricBlue]

Adult humans visiting a zoo (maybe in New Zealand) are struck by a mystic thunderbolt that morphs them into horny adolescent penguins, some queer. Everything follows from there.

Simon's on to it. We're in safe (but slow) hands .