Cages?

So again, all I am trying to do is hear anyones opinion about cages, I didn't think I was asking for information to jerk off to, I want to know what your thoughts are about cages, of those who use them and love them, I didn't think I'd like alot of things I'm trying now, but, I also thought I'd never wear a butt plug. I like the idea that a man is willing to take as well as give pain and humiliation. I find that most in this lifestyle don't think one is a Master if he is willing to submit, but I'll tell ya, the more Masters I meet the more I find most are interested in seeing the other side as well. It is hard work playing the Domme role, in my opinion, it is so much easier to take than give. Infact I think that is why I thought this would be interesting for me, just tie me up and have your way with me is so much easier than creating the party. It takes thought and creativity to make something truely amazing happen. But being a submissive, I also realize that I truelly do love to give pleasure, and if pain and humiliation are pleasure, I want to do it the best way I can. I think of cages as an odd thing to enjoy, but back to the beginning, I'll never know until I try Yes I am thinking of cages to purchase in a pet store. But I like quality. Again I just want a little feed back from those that use them and enjoy them. Why, and how? Thank you.
 
I'm afraid I don't have anything constructive to offer about cages, but I have heard that many of the best dominants have some experience as a submissive... seeing the other side of the whip helps them understand the headspace as well as learn some technique.
 
missvicky said:
it is an ignorant slut. it loves it's Master and it likes being called it, it also loves "Silence of the Lambs" it is it's favorite movie. it had met a sub a while back that referred to himself as "it" it shared this information with Sir, and Sir also calls it a slut, lilone, & pet. Yes it is new to this, and finds these names as terms of endearment, oh god are You all gonna talk about that now, "Favorite line if You can't say something nice about anyone come sit with me."

Sooooooooo, forgivvvvvvvvvvvveeeeee mmmmmmmmmeeeeee, more Saturday night trivia, yes I am old, but no longer watch tv. So I have nothing current.

I beg everyone's pardon, no he hadn't put me up to this, I am just looking for all the information I can get, I would hope your lovers tried as hard as me and got help from others to move closer to subspace.

Sir is online now, and it will continue this.
First I was going to barf, then I was going to rejoice, and now at the end I'm just confused.

Seriously, you will get funny looks if you use that "slavespeek" all the time. It's appropriate for using with your Sir, but we're not your doms, you know? We're regular people, you can talk to us like regular people. :)
 
Thanks to the translators of "slavespeek"
I barely understood the question.

Personally the movie "the pet" enlightened me a bit about cages.
I personally do wish to try one someday...
I know of 3 of them that I could "crawl into" & be safe.

*wishful look on face*

someday :)
 
missvicky said:
So again, all I am trying to do is hear anyones opinion about cages, I didn't think I was asking for information to jerk off to, I want to know what your thoughts are about cages, of those who use them and love them, I didn't think I'd like alot of things I'm trying now, but, I also thought I'd never wear a butt plug. I like the idea that a man is willing to take as well as give pain and humiliation. I find that most in this lifestyle don't think one is a Master if he is willing to submit, but I'll tell ya, the more Masters I meet the more I find most are interested in seeing the other side as well. It is hard work playing the Domme role, in my opinion, it is so much easier to take than give. Infact I think that is why I thought this would be interesting for me, just tie me up and have your way with me is so much easier than creating the party. It takes thought and creativity to make something truely amazing happen. But being a submissive, I also realize that I truelly do love to give pleasure, and if pain and humiliation are pleasure, I want to do it the best way I can. I think of cages as an odd thing to enjoy, but back to the beginning, I'll never know until I try Yes I am thinking of cages to purchase in a pet store. But I like quality. Again I just want a little feed back from those that use them and enjoy them. Why, and how? Thank you.
I don't usually stress over the idea of myself as the one creating a party. Mostly I just go wherever the mood strikes me.

For example: If I had a cage, a partner who committed the transgression in post 23, and the urge to amuse myself at her expense, I might order her to sit in the cage with a laptop, a Best of Saturday Night Live: Steve Martin DVD, and instructions to memorize (word for word) one of his routines.

This may not be titillating for you to contemplate, but I'm fairly certain that I'd be entertained by the performance. Which is really the point. See?
 
RawHumor said:
The line is Well excuuuuuuuuuse me!!!!!

But now I'm just nitpicking.
:D
No, nitpicking would be pointing out that Curtin's last name is spelled without an "a".

Misquoting a basic is something else altogether!
 
Go right ahead with the slave-lingo if it rocks your boat, miss vicky. I don't understand why everyone is so quick to mock. No one gives Etoile shit for using her futuristic pronouns, for example.
 
I'm sincerely glad you ladies are amused, but I assure you that the post was straight up!
 
...and the voice of authority speaks.



rosco rathbone said:
Go right ahead with the slave-lingo if it rocks your boat, miss vicky. I don't understand why everyone is so quick to mock. No one gives Etoile shit for using her futuristic pronouns, for example.
 
rosco rathbone said:
Go right ahead with the slave-lingo if it rocks your boat, miss vicky. I don't understand why everyone is so quick to mock. No one gives Etoile shit for using her futuristic pronouns, for example.

I wasn't mocking.. I honestly had trouble following it..
I will admit I am a newbie.. under 2 years of real time experience...
so it was HONESTLY hard for me to follow...
 
rosco rathbone said:
Go right ahead with the slave-lingo if it rocks your boat, miss vicky. I don't understand why everyone is so quick to mock. No one gives Etoile shit for using her futuristic pronouns, for example.
I'm not catching the reference to futuristic pronouns, but agree with you overall.

Personally I find "it" a whole hell of a lot less annoying than something like "lil one" or some other such appellation that is cloying beyond belief!
 
JMohegan said:
I'm not catching the reference to futuristic pronouns, but agree with you overall.

Personally I find "it" a whole hell of a lot less annoying than something like "lil one" or some other such appellation that is cloying beyond belief!

Anyone referring to themselves as "it" is unlikely to suddenly burst into tears and wail "stop objectifying me!" as one ex of mine once did......
 
JMohegan said:
I don't usually stress over the idea of myself as the one creating a party. Mostly I just go wherever the mood strikes me.

For example: If I had a cage, a partner who committed the transgression in post 23, and the urge to amuse myself at her expense, I might order her to sit in the cage with a laptop, a Best of Saturday Night Live: Steve Martin DVD, and instructions to memorize (word for word) one of his routines.

This may not be titillating for you to contemplate, but I'm fairly certain that I'd be entertained by the performance. Which is really the point. See?

I know a couple of the routines from Steve Martin's Let's Get Small album nearly word for word. :p

*enticingly spins LP on fingertip *
 
rosco rathbone said:
Go right ahead with the slave-lingo if it rocks your boat, miss vicky. I don't understand why everyone is so quick to mock. No one gives Etoile shit for using her futuristic pronouns, for example.
There's a difference, my dear. Using gender-neutral pronouns in the second person has nothing to do with writing in the third person. My remarks would have been the same if the terms used were "this girl" instead of "it" - you're comparing apples and oranges. I would bet that most people who found the original post hard to read felt that way because of the third person, not the use of "it." By changing to the third person, the meaning is obfuscated - changing pronouns doesn't do that.

As for "The Pet" - I thought that movie sucked...how can I put this delicately...big donkey balls. JMHO.
 
JMohegan said:
I'm not catching the reference to futuristic pronouns, but agree with you overall.
I believe he was referring to my use of Spivak pronouns for my D/s partner. They aren't really that futuristic; Michael Spivak used them in his book The Joy of TeX in 1982, but he says he read about the idea in a newspaper well before he began using them in his books.
 
Etoile said:
There's a difference, my dear. Using gender-neutral pronouns in the second person has nothing to do with writing in the third person. My remarks would have been the same if the terms used were "this girl" instead of "it" - you're comparing apples and oranges. I would bet that most people who found the original post hard to read felt that way because of the third person, not the use of "it." By changing to the third person, the meaning is obfuscated - changing pronouns doesn't do that.

As for "The Pet" - I thought that movie sucked...how can I put this delicately...big donkey balls. JMHO.

I found the original post impossible to understand. I'm just sticking up for the underdog. You go, miss vicky.
 
rosco rathbone said:
I found the original post impossible to understand. I'm just sticking up for the underdog. You go, miss vicky.
I love you, rosco.
 
Etoile said:
As for "The Pet" - I thought that movie sucked...how can I put this delicately...big donkey balls. JMHO.

it was neat to watch it from a newbie point of view...
I was merely suggesting it for the "know how to use" question...
she was caged quite often throughout the movie...
I know a lotof people either loved it or hated it...
most "lifestylers" hated it...
 
I could get into cages.

I loved the one in the pet, on account of it being so ornate an impractical. I fantasize about having a collection of obnoxiously avant garde bdsm equipment.
 
Marquis said:
I could get into cages.

I loved the one in the pet, on account of it being so ornate an impractical. I fantasize about having a collection of obnoxiously avant garde bdsm equipment.
You couldn't get into the one in The Pet! You're much too big. *rimshot*

You know what would be cool? Art deco BDSM equipment. That would be so fucked up.
 
Back
Top