CarolAnn's Stage Mom Style

[toeskr]

Really?

Everyone, Tnman03b is totally wrong. Having Legrandjoni saying he's totally right doesn't make it so.

And what is Legrandjoni's reason? Because my photos "aren't the kind of photos posted on Ampic." Because my photos "are normal." What does that make the kind of photos posted in Ampic? Abnormal? Oh, he means half naked and naked.

So by that logic, because my photos are normal (no nudity) they're not me. They're fake? Really?

My photos are normal, so they're easy to steal?

So therefore photos with nudity are not fake and cannot be stolen from a site that does allow nude photos?

Obviously Legrandjoni and Tnman03b aren't going to scrutinize and hold them to any sort of obligation that would dissuade the person from sharing nude photos. And apparently nude photos are better than non nude ones.

Notice how Legrandjoni says "There are many fake elements on her..." for the purpose of being snarky. Yet he isn't able to mention the "many" let alone a few..

There are people on the internet who like to say any ridiculous thing about someone that they wouldn't dare say to them if sitting across from them, because if they were and if they did, the person across from them would immediately confront them by asking for an example or proof to support the comment. On the internet, they can say whatever they wouldn't have the courage to say in person for the purpose of their own enjoyment. Or they're lonely and see it as a chance to belong to a group by echoing whatever negative thing is being said. Apparently they will say anything to feel less alone and part of something.

People with proof are quick to present it to make their point. No one withholds proof. They also don't act as if the concept of proof is unnecessary for them. That's like going to the theater, paying for a movie, and then sitting facing away from the screen and plugging their ears. And when they're asked why they did that, they'd say, "I didn't want to see the movie anyway."

To read again: because my photos are not the normal ones posted in ampics (meaning there's no nudity) that means they're fake and easy to steal. By that logic, it's conversely suggestive nude photos are real and hard to steal and without scrutiny because scrutiny would lead to leas nude photos.

And no reprimands for irresponsible false accusations made with no regard or intent to prove it's true.

If my forum post offends or upsets you you because my photos are normal and without nudity, then why not follow that saying about when you don't have anything nice to say and simply find a forum with nudity instead of trying to dissuade?

Which is what this is starting to feel like. To dissuade non nude photos.

Doth protesteth too much.

Many fakes here. Prove your worth, you already know how.

 

[TANSTAAFL58]

So many words when you could just silence the critics by posting a current pic of yourself with the date written on some paper you’re holding.

Doth protesteth too much.

Many fakes here. Prove your worth, you already know how.

Naw. I predict she'll get all self-righteous and say she has nothing to prove then do a hair flip and leave.

Prove me wrong and I will apologize.

 

[Legrandjoni]

Bla bla bla...

This is a picture thread. Stop the bla bla and post pics. Not stolen ones. Ones showing proofs.

I bet it won't happen.

 

[StageMomCarolAnn]

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1514301

Bla bla bla...

This is a picture thread. Stop the bla bla and post pics. Not stolen ones. Ones showing proofs.

I bet it won't happen.

Oh blah blah blah yourself you little baby.

Because I've easily reduced your silly logic of false inference to dust - which you will feel it necessary to deny - you'll attempt to deflect again, but will you be able to prove otherwise.

I bet it won't happen.


It's funny how I predicted all of the haters on this thread wouldn't because they couldn't defend legrandjoni's logic after I'd revealed the flaws. Just so ridiculously predictable.

Of course s the haters will get self-righteous and deny leegrandjoni's logic was flawed. Or how transparent it was of him to claim my “normal” pics are “easy to steal” thereby falsely inferring the nude ones are not.

Nor does he or they admit they don’t demand proof from the people posting nude photos or harass them demanding they show they’e “worthy.” They may claim they do. However, I took a look through two pages of threads and not once did I come across the demands being made here. The haters will not acknowledge this double standard, but all one has to do is scroll through the various posts to see they don’t hassle people posting nude photos because they don’t want to dissuade people from posting nude photos.

Clearly a double standard is being used here.


Here's another point: HussarVanburen falsely refers to my post as a "fantasy." There's nothing in my post that directly or indirectly. Clearly, he didn't read it - although he will claim that he did. Whoever this mystery person is from 10 years ago, Vanburren is so traumatized by him.

And since it seems people are acting offended that I’ve posted in the wrong section, then I will not post in the Ampics section.

My last comment is to the people who complimented the post that began this thread. Thank you for comments not just on my pics, but how I included a brief summary of the event or occasion during which the photo was taken. While some of what I mentioned may seem like minor details of no consequence - I certainly thought they were just that as well - you’ll find as the photo sets approach our present day, just how some of these minor things proved to cause major problems.

I’ll post the next set today, I hope if time permits.

 

[FlavorOfTheWeek]

You’re a lot of words, aren’t you? Can’t seem to actually shut up and read, though.

Here’s a recent and light, breezy one for you:
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1513307&page=11

We don’t care if you’re dressed or not, we just want proof you’re not stealing pics, dimwit.

Oh, and I’m female in case you need to give me a gender in your reply.

Oh blah blah blah yourself you little baby.

Because I've easily reduced your silly logic of false inference to dust - which you will feel it necessary to deny - you'll attempt to deflect again, but will you be able to prove otherwise.

I bet it won't happen.


It's funny how I predicted all of the haters on this thread wouldn't because they couldn't defend legrandjoni's logic after I'd revealed the flaws. Just so ridiculously predictable.

Of course s the haters will get self-righteous and deny leegrandjoni's logic was flawed. Or how transparent it was of him to claim my “normal” pics are “easy to steal” thereby falsely inferring the nude ones are not.

Nor does he or they admit they don’t demand proof from the people posting nude photos or harass them demanding they show they’e “worthy.” They may claim they do. However, I took a look through two pages of threads and not once did I come across the demands being made here. The haters will not acknowledge this double standard, but all one has to do is scroll through the various posts to see they don’t hassle people posting nude photos because they don’t want to dissuade people from posting nude photos.

Clearly a double standard is being used here.


Here's another point: HussarVanburen falsely refers to my post as a "fantasy." There's nothing in my post that directly or indirectly. Clearly, he didn't read it - although he will claim that he did. Whoever this mystery person is from 10 years ago, Vanburren is so traumatized by him.

And since it seems people are acting offended that I’ve posted in the wrong section, then I will not post in the Ampics section.

My last comment is to the people who complimented the post that began this thread. Thank you for comments not just on my pics, but how I included a brief summary of the event or occasion during which the photo was taken. While some of what I mentioned may seem like minor details of no consequence - I certainly thought they were just that as well - you’ll find as the photo sets approach our present day, just how some of these minor things proved to cause major problems.

I’ll post the next set today, I hope if time permits.

 

[PhotoKink]

So where did the mods move this thread after all? It sais "moved", but there are no details as to where and this is still in AmPics.

Update: never mind, it was moved by the OP, not by the mods. Now she is trying GB for size. Good luck with that!

 

[Legrandjoni]

So where did the mods move this thread after all? It sais "moved", but there are no details as to where and this is still in AmPics.

Where it belongs: In the garbage.

 

[PhotoKink]

Where it belongs: In the garbage.

Well, some may argue that GB is the garbage can

 

[WyldECoyoteCody]

Man, perfect example of how there's some real fucking assholes that got nothing but hate on the brain.

Losers.

 

[PhotoKink]

Man, perfect example of how there's some real fucking assholes that got nothing but hate on the brain.

Losers.

Congratulations! You have found another thread where you have absolutely no idea what is going on, but come in strong in support of the OP. Is there even one single thread that you commented on without getting into a fight? Good job at building a stellar reputation for yourself.

 

[tnman03]

Man, perfect example of how there's some real fucking assholes that got nothing but hate on the brain.

Losers.

I'll say that based upon the writing style you and the thread OP are likely one and the same.

Here's the thing, no one would have said anything if highly suspicious pics hadn't been posted. That someone else recognized past posting history of your RP style was happenstance. The OP could have easily proven veracity of pics and was even told how to do so but that didn't happen. So the bottom line was, fake pics which were stolen from somewhere and the OP got called out on it.

 

[WyldECoyoteCody]

Yo, what the fuck are you babbling about?

Take your meds, weirdo

 

[WyldECoyoteCody]

Congratulations!

You're not one thing you've said matters to me.

It's obvious you fruit loops sound like you're all paranoid.

Get bent.

Congratulations! You have found another thread where you have absolutely no idea what is going on, but come in strong in support of the OP. Is there even one single thread that you commented on without getting into a fight? Good job at building a stellar reputation for yourself.

 

[WyldECoyoteCody]

Bottom line is you make no sense. None.

Your writing is the same as Photokink. Total proof you're using multiple screen names to reinforce your BS.

Boom.

Your a fake and so's Photokink. It doesn't get any more obvious.

Same pattern. Every time.

Both are one.

I'll say that based upon the writing style you and the thread OP are likely one and the same.

Here's the thing, no one would have said anything if highly suspicious pics hadn't been posted. That someone else recognized past posting history of your RP style was happenstance. The OP could have easily proven veracity of pics and was even told how to do so but that didn't happen. So the bottom line was, fake pics which were stolen from somewhere and the OP got called out on it.