christian domestic discipline

[MechaBlade]

I think that apply only when you think domination as being stronger, active, aggressive and so on...

However it is as well known fact that men are very much slaves to their instincts. And there have always been a lot of women who know exactly how to pull strings to get men do what is wanted. It is very different domination: subtle and passive.

Somehow modern bdsm for Mistresses is often very masculine way to dominate. I think more natural way to dominate is such that men actually all the time are blinded enough by their lust that they actually never realize being controlled.

(And yes I do know this pretty black&white way putting it...)

Interesting.

 

[CutieMouse]

Just spit water all over when I found the CROTCHLESS pantaloons! The contrast between these vintage looking drawers and the idea that they're split for easy access?!

I just finished reading a diary of an English gentleman's sexual adventures written between 1882 and 1894. All of the pantaloons were split so that a lady could use the bathroom without getting fully undressed (he was quite fond of going up to common women/whores in the street and asking them to piss on his hand right there at the curb/slipping his hang up a woman's skirts on the train/convincing women to wander down a qiet street for a quick encounter), but it also made for easier sexual access.

Actually, about ½ way through the diary, the author started bemoaning the new trend in fashion to wear pantaloons, period. I got the impression prior to a certain point, pantaloons weren't very common articles of dress among the common classes.

I'd imagine the website is emphasizing the veiled sexual inuendos of "easy access" to appeal to their male clientel, while promoting the "modesty" aspect to the women of the household... it's an easier sell to say "split crotch pantaloons *nudge nudge* *wink wink*" than to say "Split crotch pantaloons to allow you to piss without undressing!" Really- as a guy deciding what you want your woman to wear- which sounds more appealing? LOL

 

[FluteMaster]

I'd imagine the website is emphasizing the veiled sexual inuendos of "easy access" to appeal to their male clientel, while promoting the "modesty" aspect to the women of the household... it's an easier sell to say "split crotch pantaloons *nudge nudge* *wink wink*" than to say "Split crotch pantaloons to allow you to piss without undressing!" Really- as a guy deciding what you want your woman to wear- which sounds more appealing? LOL

Sounds reasonable to me. Covers all the bases, satisfies all the parties, and allows the pantaloons to win hands down, (or was that up??)