Condoms or the pill

I can't comment on the current options about the pill vs. condoms. I'm a postmenopausal woman who had her tubes tied 25+ years ago. I will say, however, that I wish I'd never chosen to be on the pill (mid '70s to about 1980). I think the pill, at that time, seriously messed with my hormones. Including killing my libido (no longer a problem, thank heavens). May have been responsible for a bout of endometriosis and later uterine fibroids. When I transitioned to using a diaphragm, it was in many ways a pain in the ass. That fucker used to shoot across the bathroom sometimes when I had it all slippery with spermicide! But at least it didn't fuck up my hormones. I used condoms for a period of time between the diaphragm and having my tubes tied, and I think this was the best option for me prior to having my tubes tied.
 
prefer neither

Somewhat agree if in a committed relationship, but just having fun one or the other is good. I prefer the lady be on the pill as that is better for both parties. But if she isn't then it is my responsibility to cover up and just find other ways to make sure she is pleased
 
I'll say in my 20s and 30's I always made sure to bring a raincoat to the party. Not gonna rely on my partner to remember to take her pill that morning etc.. we are all human and we do forget things from time to time.

Relying on my female partner to do all the work was just irresponsible and downright disrespectful. If I was out there looking (which I'm not thankfully) and there was a male contraceptive, I'd be one of the first to be on it. How it's always fallen to the women to take the pill, have an iud get the shot etc and we men can just use condoms only is beyond me.

If science can help with ED, it can help with reducing the amount of swimmers in the pool. It's just that the RX companies haven't found the profit in it to pursue it.
 
Which do you think is more effective? I was always told that if she is on the pill then no protection is needed. (It feels so much better without a rubber).

Well both can be effective and both can fail. A condom can be a little easier to deal with in the fact that both men and women can have it and it's not something you have to remember to take on a schedule. It is however very popular I guess would be the best term to have bareback sex. In that case obviously birth control or an IUD is the best solution but the responsibility falls solely on the woman. I use an IUD personally.
 
I detest condoms, preferring to be taken natural and bare. Too, I’m not fond of the regimen required with taking the pill, so I have an IUD. Being in a relationship we both know the other is clean and we get to enjoy bareback sex with him always cumming inside me. :eek:
 
My wife got “fixed” years ago. So pregnancy wasn’t/isn’t an issue. But any guy that my wife isn’t 100% on has to wrap it up.
 
And here I am with my vasectomy, ready to flood the womb of anyone whose interested.
My husband got fixed early in our marriage so there was no need of pills or condoms. In later years we have gotten into the lifestyle and I always find it a little extra exciting thinking that someone is flooding my womb with not just cum but sperm as well. Just a mental thing but I am beyond menopause so I can embrace it fully.
 
Qu'est-ce qui est le plus efficace selon vous ? On m'a toujours dit que si elle prenait la pilule, aucune protection n'était nécessaire. (C'est tellement mieux sans protection).
Chez nous c'est le stérilet hormonal qui a été mis en oeuvre. Cela c'est avéré très efficace et très pratique en même temps !
 
Back
Top