democracts now vs democracts from the past

[Wilson23]

Oh look a race socialist coping with it's democrat roots......

Every attempt to tar any iteration of the Dems later than 1964 with racism is a lie and you know it.

Every attempt to call the Dems at any time in their history "socialist", including the New Deal period, is an even damneder lie, and you know that too.

 

[latecomer91364]

I prefer the Dems when their racism and open hatred for blacks was obvious and proudly on display - like in vile scumbag Woodrow Wilson's day.

Then they realized that the could harvest the votes of blacks, just by giving them little trinkets, and holding that stick-and carrot, and to the historical embarrassment of the black community, they bought it.

This didn't really come to fruition after the end of WWII - and the death of unapologetic racist FDR. By the time of the civil rights movement, the rat-fuck Dems had perfected their plan.

The rest was a disaster for the family unit in the black community, which sent them into criminal, and dependent crisis.

Lately, we see only the starting signs that they are starting to wake up to how the Democrats destroyed their lives and their futures.

 

[HisArpy]

I prefer the Dems when their racism and open hatred for blacks was obvious and proudly on display - like in vile scumbag Woodrow Wilson's day.

Then they realized that the could harvest the votes of blacks, just by giving them little trinkets, and holding that stick-and carrot, and to the historical embarrassment of the black community, they bought it.

This didn't really come to fruition after the end of WWII - and the death of unapologetic racist FDR. By the time of the civil rights movement, the rat-fuck Dems had perfected their plan.

The rest was a disaster for the family unit in the black community, which sent them into criminal, and dependent crisis.

Lately, we see only the starting signs that they are starting to wake up to how the Democrats destroyed their lives and their futures.

The thing that most inner city minorities don't realize is that they gave up the plantation and their massa, for enslavement to poverty and Uncle Sam's whip when they accepted wholesale welfare programs.

 

[Wilson23]

I prefer the Dems when their racism and open hatred for blacks was obvious and proudly on display - like in vile scumbag Woodrow Wilson's day.

Then they realized that the could harvest the votes of blacks, just by giving them little trinkets, and holding that stick-and carrot, and to the historical embarrassment of the black community, they bought it.

This didn't really come to fruition after the end of WWII - and the death of unapologetic racist FDR. By the time of the civil rights movement, the rat-fuck Dems had perfected their plan.

The rest was a disaster for the family unit in the black community, which sent them into criminal, and dependent crisis.

Lately, we see only the starting signs that they are starting to wake up to how the Democrats destroyed their lives and their futures.

You do understand, don't you, that there is not really any "Democratic welfare plantation," and there never was?

The Dems in their present formation are incapable of addressing the AAs' real problems, but are still much better for them than the Pubs. They vote Dem for entirely good reasons.

 

[Wilson23]

The thing that most inner city minorities don't realize is that they gave up the plantation and their massa, for enslavement to poverty and Uncle Sam's whip when they accepted wholesale welfare programs.

Everything ever said along those lines has been a lie and you know it.

 

[HisArpy]

Everything ever said along those lines has been a lie and you know it.

You're full of your usual bullshit.

Minorities were emancipated and did very well for themselves afterward. As time progressed they integrated into white society as laws were passed to prevent cover discrimination. Laws like the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Then came 1969 and Lyndon Johnson's efforts to break up the nuclear family of minorities by "giving" them welfare. It worked. It worked because it appears to be an easier life to just collect a government check every month. A check that pays the rent for the shitty apartment, in the shitty side of town, and provides a bare minimum food allotment.

You know, JUST LIKE THE PLANTATION OWNERS OF YESTERYEAR DID.

Welfare recipients may not be "owned" as slaves, but they're still slaves. If you think they're not, you're fucked in the head.

Not that we don't already know that.

 

[Wilson23]

Then came 1969 and Lyndon Johnson's efforts to break up the nuclear family of minorities by "giving" them welfare.

LBJ's War on Poverty actually reduced poverty -- unlike anything done or even suggested by any Pubs since then.

And it was always a lie to blame the welfare state for any harm to the "nuclear family."

 

[Wilson23]

Welfare recipients may not be "owned" as slaves, but they're still slaves. If you think they're not, you're fucked in the head.

No more than retirees on Social Security and Medicare are slaves.

 

[latecomer91364]

LBJ's War on Poverty actually reduced poverty -- unlike anything done or even suggested by any Pubs since then.

And it was always a lie to blame the welfare state for any harm to the "nuclear family."

No, LBJ destroyed the black family unit by giving them more money is there was no male head of household living in the home. That right there was the death-knell of the black family unit.
And it was not in 1969 - LBJ instituted this policy in his term, not Nixon's.

 

[Wilson23]

No, LBJ destroyed the black family unit by giving them more money is there was no male head of household living in the home. That right there was the death-knell of the black family unit.

Go back further. Slavery was the death-knell of the black family unit, because they could form no legally recognized marriages that would stop massa from selling off parents and children separately. That had a lasting effect on their culture after emancipation.

 

[HisArpy]

No more than retirees on Social Security and Medicare are slaves.

Everyone I know PAID IN TO Soc Sec. It's not a "handout" or "welfare."

That you seem to think it is, is why you're fucked in the head.

 

[HisArpy]

Go back further. Slavery was the death-knell of the black family unit, because they could form no legally recognized marriages that would stop massa from selling off parents and children separately. That had a lasting effect on their culture after emancipation.

^THIS...



...is utter bullshit.

 

[Wilson23]

^THIS...



...is utter bullshit.

It is a historical and sociological fact. For generations white Americans believed blacks are sexually promiscuous because of their primitive heredity, but the causes are entirely different -- after all, Africans are not notable for their promiscuity.

 

[Bray123]

Everyone I know PAID IN TO Soc Sec. It's not a "handout" or "welfare."

That you seem to think it is, is why you're fucked in the head.

Soc. Sec. is single-payer healthcare free at the point of use.

 

[Bray123]

No, LBJ destroyed the black family unit by giving them more money is there was no male head of household living in the home. That right there was the death-knell of the black family unit.
And it was not in 1969 - LBJ instituted this policy in his term, not Nixon's.

So keeping white folks in poverty maintained the white family unit?

 

[Wilson23]

Everyone I know PAID IN TO Soc Sec. It's not a "handout" or "welfare."

That you seem to think it is, is why you're fucked in the head.

So if I'm taxed to pay for your welfare, that makes you the slave?!

 

[Wilson23]

So keeping white folks in poverty maintained the white family unit?

More welfare always did go to whites than to blacks, but everybody seemed to assume the reverse.

 

[Chadrone]

wasnt that mc cartney ism in the 1940s and 1950s when hollywood started the infamous blacklist and the usa government kicked out alot of people in the entertainment world

Kinda, and it's back when American's weren't ashamed to be american.

 

[Wilson23]

Kinda, and it's back when American's weren't ashamed to be american.

Of course, the Communists (what few there were) were better Americans than the Birchers or McCarthy or HUAC.

 

[Chadrone]

Of course, the Communists (what few there were) were better Americans than the Birchers or McCarthy or HUAC.

Communist are anti-American filth, just like the rest of the Democrats.

 

[Wilson23]

Communist are anti-American filth, just like the rest of the Democrats.

They're not now and they weren't in the '50s -- and they weren't in the '30s, when the party reached its all-time peak.

 

[Chadrone]

They're not now and they weren't in the '50s -- and they weren't in the '30s, when the party reached its all-time peak.

They've always been, their collectivistic and authoritarian ideology is antithetical to that of our highly individualistic western liberal founding, structure and values.

Like Islam....totally incompatable and openly hostile, that's why you and the other USA haters love them so much. They hate the USA as much as you do.

 

[Wilson23]

They've always been, their collectivistic and authoritarian ideology is antithetical to that of our highly individualistic western liberal founding, structure and values.

They were no more anti-American than Lenin was anti-Russian, and American "values" are not what you seem to think they are. Nothing the FFs or their contemporaries did, said or thought would be any reason to preserve American capitalism indefinitely. There might be other reasons -- but the idea that America is essentially, foundationally capitalist in the sense it is essentially republican is not one of them.

 

[HisArpy]

It is a historical and sociological fact. For generations white Americans believed blacks are sexually promiscuous because of their primitive heredity, but the causes are entirely different -- after all, Africans are not notable for their promiscuity.

It's spin and utter bullshit.

Once Blacks were emancipated there was, accordingly, no slave master/owner or government agent who could interfere with their marriage or nuclear family unit. So, you referring to slavery PRIOR TO emancipation as some sort of reasoning to say that black families were still being broken up or encouraged to not be formed;


IS UTTER BULLSHIT.

However, LBJ's domestic policies, whereby they created incentives for single mothers to receive more welfare than if they were just poor families, directly created generations of financial slaves who live in disgusting conditions and put up with disgusting rules/restrictions that prevent them from lifting themselves out of the complete dependency situation that has been imposed upon them by those who at one time, OWNED them based on their race.

And they can't see it because they were reared and taught in the public schools controlled by those that promoted the economic slavery they're now in.

Strong people have strong families. Strong families not only don't need government assistance, they refuse it when offered.

 

[Wilson23]

It's spin and utter bullshit.

Once Blacks were emancipated there was, accordingly, no slave master/owner or government agent who could interfere with their marriage or nuclear family unit. So, you referring to slavery PRIOR TO emancipation as some sort of reasoning to say that black families were still being broken up or encouraged to not be formed;

It was simply that as slaves, they had never gotten into the habit of forming stable family units. Emancipation did not help that.