Despite Claims Of Mayor Bowser, Black Lives Don't Matter In D.C.

[Fuzzy1975]

So I ask you to explain how your quoted example is racism, but you can't. Ok then.

If you can't see it, and I have to explain it,then you're to dumb to understand the explanation. Sorry!

 

[TastySuckToy]

If you can't see it, and I have to explain it,then you're to dumb to understand the explanation. Sorry!

If you can't explain it, then you don't understand it or it doesn't actually exist. I'm going with the latter.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

If you can't explain it, then you don't understand it or it doesn't actually exist. I'm going with the latter.

Where did say I can't explain it?

Thanks for playing.

 

[TastySuckToy]

Where did say I can't explain it?.

You went from claiming a whole thread was there for my 'research' (with you obviously not understanding the concept of burden of proof), saying you could provide a 1000 different post examples, then trying to distract from my asking for one clear example, then upon providing a supposed example, crying you're not going to explain where the racism is in your example.

You've proven one thing for certain: there's no actual evidence Rightguide is racist that you're able to provide, and you know it.

That's why you went from 'I got a thousand examples' to 'I can't defend or explain even the one I submitted'.

Thanks for playing.

 

[Sean Renaud]

You went from claiming a whole thread was there for my 'research' (with you obviously not understanding the concept of burden of proof), saying you could provide a 1000 different post examples, then trying to distract from my asking for one clear example, then upon providing a supposed example, crying you're not going to explain where the racism is in your example.

You've proven one thing for certain: there's no actual evidence Rightguide is racist that you're able to provide, and you know it.

That's why you went from 'I got a thousand examples' to 'I can't defend or explain even the one I submitted'.

Thanks for playing.

You need look no further than he said All Lives Matter. That is all the proof you should need. IF it takes more than that you've just proven that you are in the exact same club.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Black lives have never mattered to the left.

 

[TastySuckToy]

You need look no further than he said All Lives Matter.

That's not racist or racism, that applying equality to all lives.

Only those who think certain group lives doesn't matter would object to the idea all lives matter.

 

[Sean Renaud]

That's not racist or racism, that applying equality to all lives.

Only those who think certain group lives doesn't matter would object to the idea all lives matter.

You are incorrect. IT is not applying equality to all lives.

No people who see that there are groups of people who are facing unique problems focus where it is needed. There is a genocide going on in Gaza right now. If you say "All Lives Matter" as a response to "Palestinian lives matter" you're justifying the slaughter.

 

[TastySuckToy]

You are incorrect. IT is not applying equality to all lives.

False. It literally is a statement of equality.

No people who see that there are groups of people who are facing unique problems focus where it is needed.

All people face unique problems. This doesn't alter basic logic from a simple statement.

There is a genocide going on in Gaza right now. If you say "All Lives Matter" as a response to "Palestinian lives matter" you're justifying the slaughter.

Your arguably is nonsensical. If Palestinians have lives, then by definition they are included under the umbrella of "all lives".

Claiming lives matter in no way logically leads to the idea of justifying slaughter. You may as well be claiming that saying all lives matter justifies car accidents.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

You went from claiming a whole thread was there for my 'research'

It still is, are you going to bother to look?

You've proven one thing for certain: there's no actual evidence Rightguide is racist that you're able to provide, and you know it.

There are none so blind as those who refuse to see ( or in your case look)

That's why you went from 'I got a thousand examples' to 'I can't defend or explain even the one I submitted'.

You mean the one you can't seem to understand? Then asked for the explanation it? Well seems to me, the only one who can't see it, is one who thinks like "it".

Play again....*chuckles*

 

[Sean Renaud]

Car accidents are accidents by definition. I'm sorry, I just can't deal with your high end bullshit because if one group needs special attention and you choose to spread your attention equally you are actively harming that group. Intentionally. This isn't neglect. Neglect I can understand. When I remember Uygur people I weep for their condition but I fully admit I do not prioritize them. However I don't respond to people who are focused on that problem with "all lives matter" for obvious reasons. If you're too dense to understand that its on you.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

 

[YDB95]

That's not racist or racism, that applying equality to all lives.

No, it's trivializing or outright denying the existence of the epidemic of police brutality that has been directed primarily at Black Americans. Which is indeed racist.

Only those who think certain group lives doesn't matter would object to the idea all lives matter.

Using the slogan "all lives matter" isn't really saying what you imply here. It's a loaded term, used to divert attention from systemic racism, exactly like the way Holocaust deniers will quibble about the numbers. ("Come on, six million? Can't be that bad!") That's exactly what you're doing when you say "All lives matter".

 

[Philthy_Phil]

That's not racist or racism, that applying equality to all lives.

Only those who think certain group lives doesn't matter would object to the idea all lives matter.

That's the dumbest thing I have read today.

Only racists are offended by the statement that black lives matter. If they truly believed that all lives matter,, then the term black lives matter wouldn't be offensive because it would be true to them (you).

 

[Rightguide]

Do black lives matter?

Not in DC.

 

[Rightguide]

No, it's trivializing or outright denying the existence of the epidemic of police brutality that has been directed primarily at Black Americans. Which is indeed racist.

The whole point of this thread is the absence of concern for black lives in D.C. The crime wave instituted by Mayor Bowser and her Marxist advisors in BLM is victimizing the black people of Washington DC.

 

[Sean Renaud]

The whole point of this thread is the absence of concern for black lives in D.C. The crime wave instituted by Mayor Bowser and her Marxist advisors in BLM is victimizing the black people of Washington DC.

Crime is a separate issue however and we have this problem because people like you are more scared of Marxism which you don't even know what the fuck it is than you are of getting shot. Which makes sense. No matter your color you are less likely to be shot by a criminal than you are to have to put up with other people doing better in life.

 

[ll74]

Not in DC.

Do black lives matter?

 

[IrezumiKiss]

No, under the circumstances in question which was police shootings it shows specifically that black lives do not matter. If they did you'd be leading the charge against police brutality. Its not like white people are immune but you don't care that white people get killed by cops. You're pissed that black people have had enough.

The problem isn't that I can't read for comprehension. The problem is that I can and I've played this game long enough with enough people that I know the code.

and if they actually believed that "all lives matter," they'd be in the streets marching for the white lives that have been extrajudicially executed by the police state.

 

[Sean Renaud]

They would. Lives do not matter to these people. White guy gets killed, they don't care. Black man kneels they have a fucking fit.

 

[Rightguide]

Crime is a separate issue however and we have this problem because people like you are more scared of Marxism which you don't even know what the fuck it is than you are of getting shot. Which makes sense. No matter your color you are less likely to be shot by a criminal than you are to have to put up with other people doing better in life.

I have forgotten more about this shit than you will ever become aware of. You never make sense to anyone except yourself.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

I have forgotten more about this shit than you will ever become aware of.

You flexing your Alzheimer's condition isn't the flex you think it is, beubelah.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I have forgotten more about this shit than you will ever become aware of. You never make sense to anyone except yourself.

If you had forgotten more about this than I will ever know, which is quite the claim, you wouldn't use socialist, commie, and Marxist interchangibly. But you do. Granted that is by and large an American problem and its not really worth spending hours explaining economics and politics to everybody every conversation. Its more important to get you to explain why the hell health care is a bad thing or improving infrastructure specifically under Biden of getting high speed internet to rural areas. This isn't 2000 or even 2010. Having good access to internet is no longer a luxury. Its a necessity. I'd be willing to bet that assuming Trump wins (hopefully not) the next Republican to take office is going to put basic internet on the list of things the government will provide. The same as Reagan did landlines and despite Obama getting the blame/credit, Bush did with cell phones.

 

[Rightguide]

If you had forgotten more about this than I will ever know, which is quite the claim, you wouldn't use socialist, commie, and Marxist interchangibly. But you do. Granted that is by and large an American problem and its not really worth spending hours explaining economics and politics to everybody every conversation. Its more important to get you to explain why the hell health care is a bad thing or improving infrastructure specifically under Biden of getting high speed internet to rural areas. This isn't 2000 or even 2010. Having good access to internet is no longer a luxury. Its a necessity. I'd be willing to bet that assuming Trump wins (hopefully not) the next Republican to take office is going to put basic internet on the list of things the government will provide. The same as Reagan did landlines and despite Obama getting the blame/credit, Bush did with cell phones.

Explain the real differences in detail.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Explain the real differences in detail.

You first! I'm waiting, but I doubt you'll be able to do it. Nice "sealioning" though....very childish!