kieranhalcyon01
Delicious cereal
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2011
- Posts
- 4,293
I'm more of a bluegill myselfim definitely a catfish![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm more of a bluegill myselfim definitely a catfish![]()
What? There’s pictures on here?You know where to find the AM pics thread?there are SOOO many titties there… I promise! Go and have a peek I know you want toooo
This thread was for discussions onlyyy no pics unfortunately!![]()
The simple answer is that it matters to most but not at all to others and it certainly doesn't matter to those being unauthentic.I would like to step back from the heat of recent discussions and ask something broader.
Is authenticity important here?
Lit is structured around threads, dialogue and ongoing interaction, with images being only one part of the site. By contrast, there are endless places online to scroll through porn without speaking to a single person, with no community element and no conversation required. So if someone is only interested in visuals and not the person behind them, what makes this space different?
For me, the appeal has always been that there are real people here. The images are part of it, of course. But so are the personalities, the humour, the back and forth, and the sense that there is a human being on the other side of the screen.
That is why authenticity matters to me.
Authenticity does not mean forcing verification. Anonymity and privacy absolutely matter. But there is a difference between protecting privacy and fabricating an identity. Protecting privacy means choosing what you reveal about a real self. Fabricating identity means presenting something as real that is not.
That distinction matters because it shapes whether we are interacting with real people or performances.
So the real question becomes this:
If a space built around interaction becomes flooded with imported images, AI content, or personas that are not grounded in a real person, does that change what kind of place this is? Does it slowly become just another scrolling platform rather than an open community?
If authenticity becomes optional, then the vulnerability of sharing something real becomes interchangeable with something synthetic. Over time, that shifts trust, expectations and the character of the space itself.
I often hear that many users skip sections of text and look straight for posts with pictures. That is their choice. But it does make me reflect. If the human element is irrelevant, what separates Lit from any other site that serves purely visual content?
In a world so heavily saturated with edited realities and disinformation, does it matter if some spaces remain rooted in actual human interaction?
I genuinely think it does.
I also understand that some people come here primarily to escape reality. To enjoy fantasy and to totally disconnect from everyday life and step into something playful or erotic without needing it to be grounded in anything 'real'. There is nothing inherently wrong with that...But for others, part of the appeal is that there is a real person behind the username. The fantasy might be heightened or stylised, but it is still anchored to someone who actually exists. Those are two entirely different ways of engaging.
I am not trying to take fantasy or escapism away from anyone. I know this is an erotic space. Fantasy, exaggeration and playful personas are part of what makes it fun. No one is expecting ID checks or fingerprint recognition.
However, there is still a difference between consensual fantasy and misrepresentation. If we all understand something is stylised (ie, the person behind an account has openly chosen to stay anon) or roleplay, that is one thing, if something is presented as real and it is not, that is something else entirely.
So for me, when authenticity is dismissed altogether, it can unintentionally make those who are here as themselves feel interchangeable with something manufactured.
That is the part that matters to me.
I am really interested in hearing different perspectives. This is not about naming and shaming or targeting anyone. It is about discussing what we want this space to be, and whether authenticity plays a role in that.
I would like to step back from the heat of recent discussions and ask something broader.
Is authenticity important here?
Lit is structured around threads, dialogue and ongoing interaction, with images being only one part of the site. By contrast, there are endless places online to scroll through porn without speaking to a single person, with no community element and no conversation required. So if someone is only interested in visuals and not the person behind them, what makes this space different?
For me, the appeal has always been that there are real people here. The images are part of it, of course. But so are the personalities, the humour, the back and forth, and the sense that there is a human being on the other side of the screen.
That is why authenticity matters to me.
Authenticity does not mean forcing verification. Anonymity and privacy absolutely matter. But there is a difference between protecting privacy and fabricating an identity. Protecting privacy means choosing what you reveal about a real self. Fabricating identity means presenting something as real that is not.
That distinction matters because it shapes whether we are interacting with real people or performances.
So the real question becomes this:
If a space built around interaction becomes flooded with imported images, AI content, or personas that are not grounded in a real person, does that change what kind of place this is? Does it slowly become just another scrolling platform rather than an open community?
If authenticity becomes optional, then the vulnerability of sharing something real becomes interchangeable with something synthetic. Over time, that shifts trust, expectations and the character of the space itself.
I often hear that many users skip sections of text and look straight for posts with pictures. That is their choice. But it does make me reflect. If the human element is irrelevant, what separates Lit from any other site that serves purely visual content?
In a world so heavily saturated with edited realities and disinformation, does it matter if some spaces remain rooted in actual human interaction?
I genuinely think it does.
I also understand that some people come here primarily to escape reality. To enjoy fantasy and to totally disconnect from everyday life and step into something playful or erotic without needing it to be grounded in anything 'real'. There is nothing inherently wrong with that...But for others, part of the appeal is that there is a real person behind the username. The fantasy might be heightened or stylised, but it is still anchored to someone who actually exists. Those are two entirely different ways of engaging.
I am not trying to take fantasy or escapism away from anyone. I know this is an erotic space. Fantasy, exaggeration and playful personas are part of what makes it fun. No one is expecting ID checks or fingerprint recognition.
However, there is still a difference between consensual fantasy and misrepresentation. If we all understand something is stylised (ie, the person behind an account has openly chosen to stay anon) or roleplay, that is one thing, if something is presented as real and it is not, that is something else entirely.
So for me, when authenticity is dismissed altogether, it can unintentionally make those who are here as themselves feel interchangeable with something manufactured.
That is the part that matters to me.
I am really interested in hearing different perspectives. This is not about naming and shaming or targeting anyone. It is about discussing what we want this space to be, and whether authenticity plays a role in that.
I'm sorry you had a bad time with your husband. Its horrible when it gets that far that you become vulnerable and need validation. I am glad you are in a better place now. Can I ask what your husband did that made you feel that way? Welcome to reply more private in a DM.Authenticity on a sex social media site....
You will find everything here, you just need to have the patience to find what your looking for. Some, as posted, have done just that, but be careful. Remember what you put on the Internet stays on the Internet forever.
I came here after I learned somethings about my husband and was seeking validation and was vulnerable for sometime. For the most part, most, are good people and helped me get through a difficult time. It's been a few years since I really was active on here but I am in a comfortable place in my life at the moment.
I am not sure you will find true authenticity here as we all are under some sort of anonymity to protect ourselves.
Very well put Bean. I couldn't have said it any better myself and i totally agree with all you have said.I’ve really enjoyed reading all the different responses here. I’m glad I opened this conversation!
I’m sure more nuanced takes will come with time, but I think the main takeaway is something we all recognise, at least most of us, even if we don’t always say it outright: finding authenticity on a sex site like this is a bit like finding a needle in a haystack. Not impossible, but inherently difficult if you don’t know where to look. (You gotta find your “people” and that takes time, too.)
That said, authenticity will always matter to me. Even if we meet here behind avatars that look nothing like the “real” person, it’s through conversation and interaction that you start to understand who feels genuine and who doesn’t.
I don’t mind engaging with personas. I understand anonymity entirely…whether it’s for safety, discretion, or maybe just the freedom to explore a different version of yourself. People here can step into a confidence they might not have offline, present themselves how they wish, explore different kinks and learn new things… and I genuinely understand the appeal of that.
But when images come into it… idk… it feels… like what you WANT is to be authentic?
Sharing your body (especially in a space like this) feels, at least to me, like an act of vulnerability. It suggests a level of honesty, or at the very least, a desire to be seen as you are. So when those images aren’t real, when they’re AI-generated or taken from somewhere else…it takes something away from that. It shifts the dynamic from expression to performance in a way that feels… I don’t know…less human?
At the same time, I don’t think authenticity on a site like this is ever going to be entirely straightforward.
It never will be!
It is, by nature, a space built on fantasy and stories. However, within the threads, the playground, and through ongoing conversation, you do begin to recognise patterns in people. Some show consistency, humour, and a sense of self that feels grounded. Others seem more transient in their presence, whether that’s through stirring in the politics threads or approaching interactions in a more transactional way (big up ASD)
I’ve had a lot of time to think about particular topic, because it matters to me… I’ve decided (I think) that although authenticity here might not always be obvious or immediate, it WILL show itself over time. Not in what people claim or pretend to be, but in how they consistently show up!
What a thoughtful, considered answer.I’ve really enjoyed reading all the different responses here. I’m glad I opened this conversation!
I’m sure more nuanced takes will come with time, but I think the main takeaway is something we all recognise, at least most of us, even if we don’t always say it outright: finding authenticity on a sex site like this is a bit like finding a needle in a haystack. Not impossible, but inherently difficult if you don’t know where to look. (You gotta find your “people” and that takes time, too.)
That said, authenticity will always matter to me. Even if we meet here behind avatars that look nothing like the “real” person, it’s through conversation and interaction that you start to understand who feels genuine and who doesn’t.
I don’t mind engaging with personas. I understand anonymity entirely…whether it’s for safety, discretion, or maybe just the freedom to explore a different version of yourself. People here can step into a confidence they might not have offline, present themselves how they wish, explore different kinks and learn new things… and I genuinely understand the appeal of that.
But when images come into it… idk… it feels… like what you WANT is to be authentic?
Sharing your body (especially in a space like this) feels, at least to me, like an act of vulnerability. It suggests a level of honesty, or at the very least, a desire to be seen as you are. So when those images aren’t real, when they’re AI-generated or taken from somewhere else…it takes something away from that. It shifts the dynamic from expression to performance in a way that feels… I don’t know…less human?
At the same time, I don’t think authenticity on a site like this is ever going to be entirely straightforward.
It never will be!
It is, by nature, a space built on fantasy and stories. However, within the threads, the playground, and through ongoing conversation, you do begin to recognise patterns in people. To me, the most “authentic” users here show consistency, humour, and a sense of self that feels grounded in reality, rather than fantasy... and others definitely seem more transient in their presence, whether that’s through stirring in the politics threads or approaching interactions in a more transactional way (big up ASD).
I’ve had a lot of time to think about particular topic, because it matters to me… I’ve decided (I think) that although authenticity here might not always be obvious or immediate, it WILL show itself over time. Not in what people claim or pretend to be, but in how they consistently show up!
I agree with you, but disagree on sharing your body. We all want to look more attractive so we find ways to take images of ourselves that are more flattering. Whether that be lingerie, masks, sexy footwear, hairstyles, Botox, anal bleaching, hair removal, the list is endless. Let's be honest "most" come here to see sexy not real life, otherwise society would not need porn or fantasy to fulfill kinks desires etc. The porn industry is built on fulfilling fantasies.I’ve really enjoyed reading all the different responses here. I’m glad I opened this conversation!
I’m sure more nuanced takes will come with time, but I think the main takeaway is something we all recognise, at least most of us, even if we don’t always say it outright: finding authenticity on a sex site like this is a bit like finding a needle in a haystack. Not impossible, but inherently difficult if you don’t know where to look. (You gotta find your “people” and that takes time, too.)
That said, authenticity will always matter to me. Even if we meet here behind avatars that look nothing like the “real” person, it’s through conversation and interaction that you start to understand who feels genuine and who doesn’t.
I don’t mind engaging with personas. I understand anonymity entirely…whether it’s for safety, discretion, or maybe just the freedom to explore a different version of yourself. People here can step into a confidence they might not have offline, present themselves how they wish, explore different kinks and learn new things… and I genuinely understand the appeal of that.
But when images come into it… idk… it feels… like what you WANT is to be authentic?
Sharing your body (especially in a space like this) feels, at least to me, like an act of vulnerability. It suggests a level of honesty, or at the very least, a desire to be seen as you are. So when those images aren’t real, when they’re AI-generated or taken from somewhere else…it takes something away from that. It shifts the dynamic from expression to performance in a way that feels… I don’t know…less human?
At the same time, I don’t think authenticity on a site like this is ever going to be entirely straightforward.
It never will be!
It is, by nature, a space built on fantasy and stories. However, within the threads, the playground, and through ongoing conversation, you do begin to recognise patterns in people. To me, the most “authentic” users here show consistency, humour, and a sense of self that feels grounded in reality, rather than fantasy... and others definitely seem more transient in their presence, whether that’s through stirring in the politics threads or approaching interactions in a more transactional way (big up ASD).
I’ve had a lot of time to think about particular topic, because it matters to me… I’ve decided (I think) that although authenticity here might not always be obvious or immediate, it WILL show itself over time. Not in what people claim or pretend to be, but in how they consistently show up!
Thankyou for taking the time to write that!I agree with you, but disagree on sharing your body. We all want to look more attractive so we find ways to take images of ourselves that are more flattering. Whether that be lingerie, masks, sexy footwear, hairstyles, Botox, anal bleaching, hair removal, the list is endless. Let's be honest "most" come here to see sexy not real life, otherwise society would not need porn or fantasy to fulfill kinks desires etc. The porn industry is built on fulfilling fantasies.
Old ladies with grey hair hairy bushes sags and wrinkles don't have a big audience.
That's life and that's ok, just don't delude yourself that when getting aroused, someone else has probably made you aroused. My husband watches porn and lustfully gets aroused by younger faster models and thoughts of fantasy and kinks which he enjoys. There is no denying the authenticity of his arousal either.
FWIW even though I know I’m never gonna met anyone the fact that I COULD adds a lot to the experience.Thankyou for taking the time to write that!
I do see what you’re saying, and you’ve made really some valid points!
Of course arousal in spaces like this is often driven by fantasy. that’s part of the appeal.
But I don’t think that’s the same thing as what I meant by authenticity…Being aroused by something doesn’t mean you believe it’s real, it just means it’s effective at turning you on… right?
I (personally) prefer knowing the person I’m engaging with is actually the person in the images when talking about AM pics here on lit!
I also have to disagree with one of your other points…. I think many users of lit come to AM pics to see real and sexy!
There are hundreds of porn sites that offer perfectly curated content of airbrushed, filtered blemish, cellulite and scar free models… here on lit you get to see it all!!! The grey, the flabby, the blemishes the sag! And it’s all very very beautiful! I think it’s rare to see anyone here full of Botox/perfectly curated unless they’re a catfish using stolen images from porn sites! (As ladies we can spot these from a mile away!)
I know a many users here who have used the AM pics threads as an outlet to be more and feel more confident in their own skin, I also know it’s a turn on for men who come here that seek imperfection rather than the beauty standards that are often seen everywhere else online! Not everyone wants young/model/curated porn vibes. And Lits Am Pics is exactly that…. Amateur Pictures, a place to avoid total perfection.![]()
I agree... when I watch porn (which is less and less these days), it tends to be amateur couples/solo having REAL sex/orgasms... I get turned off at badly written scripts and terrible acting skills...I for one, when looking on AM Pics, I want to see the real person, walts and all. I much prefer the natural every day real persons body than AI or enhanced body's. As you say, you can look at any number of porn sites for model or enhanced looks.
Only if they're authentic warts.Thats why Lits AM pics kinda fills that gap in the word of porn and sex sites...we want warts n all!!!
Oh I hate that kind of porn. It never relates to real life. Men fucking like a jack hammer, women moankng and groaning, eyes rolling back etc.I agree... when I watch porn (which is less and less these days), it tends to be amateur couples/solo having REAL sex/orgasms... I get turned off at badly written scripts and terrible acting skills...
Any porn that is filmed in (most likely) in a mansion, outside by a pool with groups of (although VERY beautiful) women FAKE moaning, rolling their eyes into the backs of their heads, men with 12 inch (OUCH btw) penis's grunting and "sweating" is a no from me.
From a directive standpoint alone its irritating. I KNOW you have filmed that one shot 10 times just to get the perfect image for the cover...or I KNOW that you're using lube that is NOT how wet he's made you
Thats why Lits AM pics kinda fills that gap in the word of porn and sex sites...we want warts n all!!!
You are more audio based I feel.I agree... when I watch porn (which is less and less these days), it tends to be amateur couples/solo having REAL sex/orgasms... I get turned off at badly written scripts and terrible acting skills...
Any porn that is filmed in (most likely) in a mansion, outside by a pool with groups of (although VERY beautiful) women FAKE moaning, rolling their eyes into the backs of their heads, men with 12 inch (OUCH btw) penis's grunting and "sweating" is a no from me.
From a directive standpoint alone its irritating. I KNOW you have filmed that one shot 10 times just to get the perfect image for the cover...or I KNOW that you're using lube that is NOT how wet he's made you
Thats why Lits AM pics kinda fills that gap in the word of porn and sex sites...we want warts n all!!!