Veroe
Maestro/Truthseeker
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2009
- Posts
- 63,401
This is the last season they will film, Alton wants to move onto new projects.
Too bad. Good eats was my gateway drug to Food Network.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is the last season they will film, Alton wants to move onto new projects.
A bit late, but I feel like anyone who has Starz needs to be watching Spartacus. Perhaps it's not as stylistically well done as HBO's Rome, but it's a cool show, and there really are some good actors there. Of course, John Hannah isn't there to steal the show anymore, but still.
Don't have Starz but I have the dvds of the 1st season and the prequel series...anxiously awaiting the release of Spartacus Vengeance on dvd now.
I was sad to hear about Andy Whitfield though.
I'll confess, the first episode doesn't quite get the blood pumping the same way some of the better done episodes in season 1 do. But the trailer for the rest of the season looks freaking awesome.
I'm really excited about it. There's few stories in history that lend themselves to epic storytelling as well as the guy who began as a slave, but came to lead an army that had the world's greatest empire trembling in fear.
It seems I really need to get into "The Walking Dead." I keep hearing good things. Another thing I plan on checking out is "Boardwalk Empire," if I can get HBO back onto my service plan.
Spartacus: Vengeance continues to look good. Episodes 2 and 3 were really good entertainment-I was disappoint with the 4th one, though, it just felt like filler.
"House" continues to hold my interest, but I hope they manage to conclude the series well. Dr. Park doesn't annoy me as much as she used to-I can actually understand what she's saying now. It's Dr. Adams that annoys the hell out of me at this point. It's like she's playing the same role that Cameron, and then Thirteen did, just because she's another pretty face. I wish she felt more like a new character rather than, "same old generic pretty female doctor."
I finally got to see "Game of Thrones." Was excited to hear about the series since I was such a huge fan of the books. I feel the need to share my thoughts about the show here, somewhat.
1) I almost didn't recognize Peter Dinklage. His voice as Tyrion Lannister sounded almost regal, not like I'm used to hearing him. There's limited choices when casting little people, I suppose, but that was brilliant.
2) Wasn't sure about the casting decision for Cat Stark. In the books, I don't think an age is given, but the general sense is that she's in her 30s. The woman they cast for her, I don't know her well, but she's in her 40s, and looks it. Older than I expected for her. Catelyn Stark has 5 kids, yes, but she started young-in this historical period, women generally do start young.
3) I'm actually surprised at how good casting choices they made for several of the kids. There's a lot of difficulties in finding quality child actors-of course, a lot of kids you're used to seeing are too often producers' children, and really not actors. But it's amazing that they got everyone nailed down to generally the right age, and with the look-Sansa Stark is the one where they clearly went older, and it shows-she looks more like 16 than 13-but she has a young looking face and eyes.
4) Okay, I understand you had budget limitations, but you really peeved me off with the way you skipped one of those battle scenes. When Tyrion is leading his Hillmen into battle, it's a very favorite scene of mine in the book. Here he is, a person who was never supposed to see battle, and he's actually shoved into a position of leadership, and he does pretty well at it. It's kind of an awesome moment for him, responding to something he's not trained for simply because it's expected of his position. But on the show, they couldn't show the battle, so they had one of his own men accidentally kick him in the head, knocking him out, and then he's trampled by his own soldiers.
It's some of the same crap that bothered me from Lord of the Rings, but it bothers me even more here. Part of the point of Tyrion's character is that he can't be taken seriously because he's a dwarf, but Martin took him and made him one of the most complicated and interesting characters. The audience is supposed to take him QUITE seriously-since we're not actually apart of the world we're reading about, we CAN take him seriously, even more than his own family does. For some reason, though, it seems like it's necessary to play the short person for comedic value, because that's what we expect, or something. It honestly offends me-as I said, they did the same thing with Gimli from Lord of the Rings, a very serious character in the books who was often the designated comic relief in the films. It's like directors are telling us that we need to just put little people in a circus or something.
5) Feel like I should say something about Sean Bean. He's good in almost any role he plays, really, and getting him onto an HBO series as Ned Stark was a coup. Well played, HBO.
6) I'd like to object about how they over-sexed the story, but honestly, that's very much how the story plays out.
7) That said, as good as it is, I feel reading the book should still be a necessity, and I hope people who had never read the books were encouraged to after watching this series. There's a lot of what makes it a brilliantly written fantasy series that's just missing from the show because there's no real way to capture that like Martin did in his narrative. It must have been really hard for people who hadn't read anything before to identify who's who, for one. And there's a lot of backstory that's relayed thought character reminiscing, including some stuff that's clearly foreshadowing many different things (even things that still haven't happened, as of the fifth book) just by the way it's written. Don't think there was really a way to capture that, but I wish we had a few of Ned Stark's recollections about Robert's Rebellion making their way in.
8) One more serious problem-Cat Stark was a very different character on the show from the way she acted in the book. Two major problems: First, she tries to talk Ned out of leaving to become the King's hand on the show. In the book, she absolutely urged him into it. She's a woman who understand duty and obedience VERY well, and she knew that telling the sitting King, friend or not, "No," would have very serious ramifications. She accepts her role, having limited choices-her husband was chosen for her, she's subservient to her husband, and it's supposed to be a commentary on how things really were in the Middle Ages-women had very limited agency. Along the same lines, she criticizes Robb for leading his armies when she finds his encampment, instead of leaving a man to do it. in the book, she praises him for acting lordly, and being responsible. She actually swells up with pride as she watches him, and she's very careful in the way she gives him advice-not to chide him or make him feel like a child. She's not an overprotective mother, she's married to a Stark, and she knows that winter is coming. That was, again, a very defining moment for her, and they changed it. She's not going to coddle her children-except maybe Bran.
That's it, though. I'm very pleased I got to watch it during my extended break on the holiday weekend.
I loved that it came back for another season, enjoying it very much.
Read the books!!!
Read the books!!!
Well this counts I suppose. It's pretty the only game I'm looking forward to.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9WXUA4WIbg
I dunno I'm still recovering from the epic fail of the ending of Mass Effect 3. Put playing video games back on the shelf after that bungling to an otherwise awesome game.
I would love to play MW3!!! Just have to finish my current games first!
I can find a bit wrong with Mass Effect 3 other than the ending. But fear not due to internet hate, Bioware will put "closure" to the end for all those whining about it. Not to say you are though.
I don't see how they can given the ending(s) they gave unless they redo the whole ending.
Okay I'm going to ask what you guys think in one corner is the up and coming challenger making a name for itself: Marvel's the Avengers and in the opposite corner is undisputed heavyweight champion of the world: DC's The Dark Knight...Which is the best comic book movie ever, (so far-discounting the Dark Knight Rises since it hasn't been released yet)?
I dunno I'm still recovering from the epic fail of the ending of Mass Effect 3. Put playing video games back on the shelf after that bungling to an otherwise awesome game.