LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Erotic Art with a Twist

Y2K? Not here ...

be102.jpg


Artist's site: http://www.kierst.com/Thomas/thomas.html
 
As a long time lurker and random poster of this thread I have to say Kierst has a great eye and thanks to Angelic Assasin to posting the best of the best.
 
AngelicAssassin said:
The artist's eye, or the site?

keeping-a-check-on-things-h.jpg
Click to expand...

The artist eye for content... in ask a dom thread Lady Aria made a post about our high court said bdsm pictures this person had on the web are illegal so...
 
leeroy jenkins said:
The artist eye for content...
Click to expand...
Oh, i've seen a few US artists with a good eye. Posted from a few of their sites as well.
leeroy jenkins said:
in ask a dom thread Lady Aria made a post about our high court said bdsm pictures this person had on the web are illegal so...
Click to expand...
Well, if the high court can induce the legislature to fund a big enough task force, i'm sure we'll have the same result as Prohibition: a lot of money spent with little result. The Puritans haven't figured out the difficulties in monitoring the viewing of content yet. Which leads to the next point.

Corporate America has the right to restrict web access of its employees for one reason. Corporate America pays for the infrastructure for its employees to work. The same reasoning, however, will eventually come back to haunt the individuals so incensed about what others may view in their own home. i pay for web access. They may restrict what can be hosted on a site in the US (for a minimal time), but won't have much luck abroad.

So, we're back to the next argument: protection of minors from viewing what the "majority" deems not savory. i have one thing to say about that. Either require a license for bearing children, or STFU and worry about your own kids.
 
AngelicAssassin said:
Oh, i've seen a few US artists with a good eye. Posted from a few of their sites as well. Well, if the high court can induce the legislature to fund a big enough task force, i'm sure we'll have the same result as Prohibition: a lot of money spent with little result. The Puritans haven't figured out the difficulties in monitoring the viewing of content yet. Which leads to the next point.

Corporate America has the right to restrict web access of its employees for one reason. Corporate America pays for the infrastructure for its employees to work. The same reasoning, however, will eventually come back to haunt the individuals so incensed about what others may view in their own home. i pay for web access. They may restrict what can be hosted on a site in the US (for a minimal time), but won't have much luck abroad.

So, we're back to the next argument: protection of minors from viewing what the "majority" deems not savory. i have one thing to say about that. Either require a license for bearing children, or STFU and worry about your own kids.
Click to expand...

I will say you excel at finding good pics for both threads in the cafe. The high court makes laws from the bench and we the people let it continue because our representivies will not stop them. Its amazing that the Purtians still have a lasting legecy on our social reality in the states. I mean in the sense that if something does not conform to their views then its got to be bad or evil.
 
Nigel Cole ~ Lesson

leeroy jenkins said:
I will say you excel at finding good pics for both threads in the cafe.
Click to expand...
Thank you. Feel free to contribute anything you find of interest as well.
leeroy jenkins said:
The high court makes laws from the bench and we the people let it continue because our representivies will not stop them. Its amazing that the Purtians still have a lasting legecy on our social reality in the states. I mean in the sense that if something does not conform to their views then its got to be bad or evil.
Click to expand...
Smiling because i've heard this view recently from a conservative concerning Roe vs Wade. With all honesty, you get what you vote for, although some think a Clancy novel plot device might help (granted, no one knows for sure the intended alternate destination for Flight 93). i'd prefer to see as much interest and turnout for elections as for some of the "reality" tv shows. Add to that a demand for accountability enforced by a revocation of pension for idiocy and bad performance. But now we're sliding away from the fun stuff ...

lesson.jpg
 
AngelicAssassin said:
Smiling because i've heard this view recently from a conservative concerning Roe vs Wade. With all honesty, you get what you vote for, although some think a Clancy novel plot device might help (granted, no one knows for sure the intended alternate destination for Flight 93). i'd prefer to see as much interest and turnout for elections as for some of the "reality" tv shows. Add to that a demand for accountability enforced by a revocation of pension for idiocy and bad performance. But now we're sliding away from the fun stuff ...

lesson.jpg
Click to expand...

I would add to the thread but I use the internet for 3 thing warcraft, email and lit so... Chris Rock said it best. On some issues he is conservative and other issues he is liberal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PrettyLilPussy19
Babygirl: A Film Discussion
Replies
9
Views
430
southern_sweety
S
M
What would you do if I shared my bound wife with you?
Replies
11
Views
714
Ash999
A
All_4_Love
Masculine/feminine energy
Replies
12
Views
599
subdudeme13
subdudeme13
Desirae_Nicole
30 days of passion and revenge part 4
Replies
3
Views
228
Sass84
Sass84
MagicFlute
BDSM song
Replies
0
Views
217
MagicFlute
MagicFlute
Back
Top