soflabbwlvr
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Posts
- 4,460
You have your reasoning flipped. The primary reason is that it doesn't make economic sense to squeeze a lemon with no juice in it.
That is precisely what I said.
And, again, if the owners of this site actually have legal counsel who know anything about the publishing industry, I'll eat my shorts. That too is wishful thinking. Their failure to keep actionable material off this site screams of their ignorance of copyright law.
"Actionable?" An element of any action is damages. Other than the nominal statutory damages, a plaintiff would have a very difficult time proving actual economic damages.
As to whether they have qualified counsel, that is something neither you nor I can possibly verify, nor will anyone ever know unless and until they becomed involved in litigation.
Soflabbwlvr,
I'm sure you'll appreciate that I was not citing wiki as authority.
Absolutely. I mentioned that for the benefit of anyone else who may read this thread and want to base an argument on a wikipedia entry.
*And it's Handcuffgirl, not elfin, who's playing the smutty fanfic game.
Actually, she was predicting dire consequences if handcuffgirl continues to publish fanfic. It was her post that I was responding to.
And I'm not sure what jurisdiction you're in, but obscenity can mean more than an injunction. Knowingly distributing obscenity is a class D felony in New York, for example, and punishable by 1-7 years in prison. So it stands to reason that Laurel and Manu are likely to be watching obscenity a bit more closely and their choices re: content make sense because their best strategy would be to argue for free speech protection under the test from Miller v. California. Frankly, I wouldn't want to be the attorney who had to stand up in front of a judge to argue that kiddie or critter porn survives as protected speech under the Miller test.
Of course, that raises all sorts of jurisdictional problems. Where is lit. located? Where is the hosting ISP? Does the state of New York have jurisdiction over the entire worldwide web?
If it is a scienter offense, is it necessary that the site owners know the community standards of New York?
None of this makes much of a difference to handcuffgirl's situation.
And the point of this exercise, for me at any rate, was not to instill panic. It was to educate on why there is, in fact, something wrong with writing smutty fanfic and to point out some of the potential consequences of getting caught monkeying with someone else's intellectual property. You know, doing that whole "counseling" thing?
And yes, I'd like some case cites too so it seems one of us ought to find an ambitious first-year associate to dump this little research project onto. Now, if I could just find a non-suspicious way to dole out that assignment.
To make it really interesting, you should write a story about it. A pair of internet webmasters and an aspiring author come to see you after recieving a cease and desist letter from Stephenie Meyer's publisher...
I think you all need to start quaffing gin.
It's not Friday yet. Tonight is a scotch night.