Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree that it is better seen in person and viewed from several angles.
White Cubes - those in the box are real sugar cubes (Fair Trade, of course!). The black and white cubes in and from the cage, and tumbling between the cage and the box of sugar cubes, are marble.
The off white triangle was bleached by the camera flash. It is actually Gold colour, for the Golden Triangle of Trade. Manufactured Trade Goods went from England to West Africa where they were exchanged for slaves; slaves went from West Africa to the Caribbean where they were sold and the proceeds bought: Sugar to be taken to England. There was a substantial profit made on each leg of the Golden Triangle.
The cage is a bird feeder. The whole piece is about 15 inches long, six inches wide and six inches high, standing on a plastic box of the same dimensions, therefore total height is 12 inches. Underneath the plastic box, and seen through it, are pictures of Duchamp's two versions of "Why Not Sneeze, Rose Selavy?".
The sticks are bamboo canes, the closest I could get to sugar canes, but also representing the rattan canes with which slaves were beaten.
Ah HA! Indeed, having the libretto helps! Having some historical knowledge doesn't hurt!
But even with the libretto, which is only a very simple explanation of my thought process in this work, the general responses have still been:
WTF was (og) thinking? OR I don't understand it at all.
Which of course were the responses to Marcel Duchamp's original piece.
Seems to me, you have the benefit of Duchamp's legacy, as well as, what I consider, a more concrete "story" rather than making a surreal statement.
Though there is metaphor in both.
My critique would be: it would be stronger (visually less cluttered) without the golden triangle. And if you had had the resources to obtain sugar cane..and perhaps built the cage from that...? perhaps? A cubic cage to balance the cubic sugar cube package opposite...? just pondering. A really cool project Og!
Thank you for sharing this journey.
Og, I LOVED it! I love all your work. The idea of combining Duchamp and thoughts about fair trade and the French Revolution is FANTASTIC!
I've written about the hypocrisy of someone like Rousseau writing 'man is born free and everywhere is in chains' while benefiting economically from slave labour in the French Caribbean myself, so I very much appreciated this (although I admit I did laugh quite a lot too, especially in the posts about the vampire blood). You know, of course, Sidney Mintz's book on the sugar trade, Sweetness and Power, and Said's famous analysis of Mansfield Park. I liked the way Rozema referenced that thinking in her rather spicy film of the book very much.
I only wish I could have seen this in the 3D original, and can't wait for your next art work.
I hadn't read this poem for many years! I vividly remember being struck by it when I came across it as a child in a probably unsuitable anthology someone gave me for my birthday.
One of my friends came up with the concept of Fair Trade, btw, LOL. His wife drew the logo.
It's often the way with politics, that aspirations are greater than we can actually achieve. Failure to get this leads to a lot of disillusionment, while some people toil thanklessly on making sure the sewerage system functions and other things that we don't think about until they're not working properly. Politics is about so much more than people realise.
Is it time to protect the coast from the flood of sewerage from young footballers?
"Zealously stand guard against the rising tide of cliches that looms ominously, ever threatening to engulf your work in a sea of banality." (EWH)
A developer wants to build an out-of-town superstore and a 1,000 or so houses and has raised support by promising extensive sports facilities including youth football.
But the sports facilities are on land that currently floods, made worse when the sea outfall is blocked by a high tide. The local sewers are overloaded, sometimes spilling onto properties downstream from the proposed sports field. Where will the sewage from the new properties go?
Of course the developer claims that the flood/sewage difficulties will be solved. But some see the sports facilities as a bribe to get support for the planning application.
Fair Trade? or All's Fair in Love and Money-Making?
Oh Dear, Have your town council take a look across the pond. Providing sports facilities has long been a bribe (sorry, inducement) to towns in the U.S. and Canada. The end price to the town is generally much higher than the cost of the facility.
Caveat emptor, Og.
I do. But many of my local citizens can't see the stick because they're focussing on the carrot. I'm unpopular - again.
Past developers around my town have been good on promises but the delivery never seems to meet the promise.
The adage to not "look a gift horse in the mouth" all too often has its effect in these cases. Any agreement should specify the standards for constructing/installing the facility and a proper assessment of future maintenance costs. We've often found that the gift horse needed both emergency and long-term medical care.