Have Never Found A REAL Man

I'm reminded of Dollparts. Anyone remember "her"?

Also are the schools out yet? Yeah.

As for Mr. High and Mighty, you women are cunts but you, a man are entitled to your opinion, a tool or a troll? Both? :eek:

i remember dollparts, yes.

and did i say my opinion was worth more than anyone elses? no, i don't think so. you just want to get all territorial on me, eh? the interwebz version of pissing against a tree. ;)

youz shouldn't be so easy to wind up. :p
 
Glad I'm not the only one to remember Dollparts drama, and very special neediness.

I meant to imply you are a sexist pig saying that Primalex gets to have an opinion whereas the rest are merely cunts. The "cunts" were in fact, relaying salient information to BalletBound, rather than attacking. Attacking the "cunts" is what YOU did.

BalletBound, will, I hope understand that and post in ways that do not violate the rules or irritate in the future. Hopefully she got enough contacts to wank online with to take care of that emphatic "need" for a while and will contribute to the board in more responsible ways.

I looked you up. At first I thought you must be ice princess's daddy or something. Turns out you've been here a good while. You have written a good many stories. I like that. Many of your stories are rated hot. I like that. You post often but not often here, usually, the playground so perhaps you were hoping to get something going on with the icy miss after all. And you have a cute butt if that is in fact your butt. I like cute butts very much.

But, your attack on people on this board is unwarranted, IMO. Yes, that can get me cranked up. I don't appreciate it even if you were merely trying a gambit on the newbie.

i remember dollparts, yes.

and did i say my opinion was worth more than anyone elses? no, i don't think so. you just want to get all territorial on me, eh? the interwebz version of pissing against a tree. ;)

youz shouldn't be so easy to wind up. :p
 
Last edited:
All people are "real". I suggest you find your local munch and go to it. Skin to skin sex is quite a bit better, if messier, at times than online sex.

I have had dreams of being shared... dominated... humiliated and what a woman tastes like..

Really would find either one or more people interested in taking my body while it's at its prime.
 
Glad I'm not the only one to remember Dollparts drama, and very special neediness.

I meant to imply you are a sexist pig saying that Primalex gets to have an opinion whereas the rest are merely cunts. The "cunts" were in fact, relaying salient information to BalletBound, rather than attacking. Attacking the "cunts" is what YOU did.

BalletBound, will, I hope understand that and post in ways that do not violate the rules or irritate in the future. Hopefully she got enough contacts to wank online with to take care of that emphatic "need" for a while and will contribute to the board in more responsible ways.

I looked you up. At first I thought you must be ice princess's daddy or something. Turns out you've been here a good while. You have written a good many stories. I like that. Many of your stories are rated hot. I like that. You post often but not often here, usually, the playground so perhaps you were hoping to get something going on with the icy miss after all. And you have a cute butt if that is in fact your butt. I like cute butts very much.

But, your attack on people on this board is unwarranted, IMO. Yes, that can get me cranked up. I don't appreciate it even if you were merely trying a gambit on the newbie.

it might help if you slow down, go back, and look at the thread. i used the word cuntiness in ref to one poster well before the primalex person dropped in with the vitriol.

if anyone has been 'attacked' here, it's me. again, go back and examine the thread properly.

my posting history? primarily PG with an eye on the AH. i also dip into the GB. i spotted this thread and made a comment, which forum it's in doesn't really matter to me. as for getting it on with icy miss, i'm not interested in hook-ups. been there, done that - as the saying goes. made some real-life friends, too - as in met face-to-face.

yes it's my bottom.
 
it might help if you slow down, go back, and look at the thread. i used the word cuntiness in ref to one poster well before the primalex person dropped in with the vitriol.

if anyone has been 'attacked' here, it's me. again, go back and examine the thread properly.

my posting history? primarily PG with an eye on the AH. i also dip into the GB. i spotted this thread and made a comment, which forum it's in doesn't really matter to me. as for getting it on with icy miss, i'm not interested in hook-ups. been there, done that - as the saying goes. made some real-life friends, too - as in met face-to-face.

yes it's my bottom.

Given your travels (and travails, apparently) around Lit-land, no doubt you've run into the occasional case where friends gather up in support of friends. Seela, about whom you introduced the ever-so-mature term "cuntiness," is a treasured friend in these parts. She is also, bar none, likely the single nicest person who posts regularly in this forum. Since you just dropped in at random to bless us with your ego, you probably hadn't noticed that by the time she started this thread, she had pissed off practically all the regulars by spamming the same message in nearly every extant thread. Given that background, Seela's remark to the OP was the height of courtesy. A more appropriate reply would have involved suggesting an anatomically impossible but highly popular act of self-love.
 
Given your travels (and travails, apparently) around Lit-land, no doubt you've run into the occasional case where friends gather up in support of friends. Seela, about whom you introduced the ever-so-mature term "cuntiness," is a treasured friend in these parts. She is also, bar none, likely the single nicest person who posts regularly in this forum. Since you just dropped in at random to bless us with your ego, you probably hadn't noticed that by the time she started this thread, she had pissed off practically all the regulars by spamming the same message in nearly every extant thread. Given that background, Seela's remark to the OP was the height of courtesy. A more appropriate reply would have involved suggesting an anatomically impossible but highly popular act of self-love.

...and another one steps up with a complete analysis of my psyche. you decided to drop into this thread, why? to give me the benefit of your ego? is it another territorial pissing thing?

it's a simple matter of using the report post tool, or a PM to Laurel to get spamming erased.

any more internet warriors going to have a pop?
 
...and another one steps up with a complete analysis of my psyche. you decided to drop into this thread, why? to give me the benefit of your ego? is it another territorial pissing thing?

it's a simple matter of using the report post tool, or a PM to Laurel to get spamming erased.

any more internet warriors going to have a pop?

Hardly an attempt to offer "a complete analysis of my psyche," as you put it. Merely an explanation for why your remark, which you thought was warranted, received such a strong reaction. Explaining what others do usually doesn't work well as analysis of anyone's psyche, but perhaps you're special? Perhaps you've also noticed that reporting posts, both with the report tool and by PM to Laurel, don't always work instantaneously. As it's not always evident that such reporting has happened, others often enter the fray to have their fun, as you did.
 
Hardly an attempt to offer "a complete analysis of my psyche," as you put it. Merely an explanation for why your remark, which you thought was warranted, received such a strong reaction. Explaining what others do usually doesn't work well as analysis of anyone's psyche, but perhaps you're special? Perhaps you've also noticed that reporting posts, both with the report tool and by PM to Laurel, don't always work instantaneously. As it's not always evident that such reporting has happened, others often enter the fray to have their fun, as you did.

nope, it doesn't work instantaneously, but she usually gets round to it.

why do you always have to have a little dig in your responses? is it an attempt to wind me up? 'cause it doesn't work. ;)
 
Glad someone thought so.

:rose:

Perhaps only in retrospect. I do recall the agony at the time, too. There have been many, many people over the years who have disrupted the boards for a few months...
 
Perhaps you've also noticed that reporting posts, both with the report tool and by PM to Laurel, don't always work instantaneously.

Maybe we should have a third mod again? I remember we used to have Cat, Etoile and KC at one point.

I realize it still wouldn't work instantenously, but perhaps a little faster.

But I still think the best way to handle things like the one that's being discussed in this thread is to simply tell the poster that kind of behavior is not ok. Most stop after that (until some of them start again). That's instantenous and doesn't add to the workload of the mods. They have lots to do as it is already.
 
Last edited:
Maybe we should have a third mod again? I remember we used to have Cat, Etoile and KC at one point.

Did we? I thought I came in after Cat. I forget.

And yeah, I was always the quick one to respond to reports, but that's probably why it burned me out. Well, that and 12 years of it.
 
Did we? I thought I came in after Cat. I forget.

And yeah, I was always the quick one to respond to reports, but that's probably why it burned me out. Well, that and 12 years of it.

At least on paper we had three mods at one time, but I don't know if Cat was active then. I think you stepped up when Cat went AWOL for a while?
 
Maybe we should have a third mod again? I remember we used to have Cat, Etoile and KC at one point.

I realize it still wouldn't work instantenously, but perhaps a little faster.

But I still think the best way to handle things like the one that's being discussed in this thread is to simply tell the poster that kind of behavior is not ok. Most stop after that (until some of them start again). That's instantenous and doesn't add to the workload of the mods. They have lots to do as it is already.

Yeeeeep. Not to mention the fact that, in theory, posters should know the rules before posting.

We've got one mod who comes to the boards rarely, from all indications. So your post was hardly an unreasonable response to start with.
 
Attention whores I can stand a bit, but whining, not so much.

:rose:

Perhaps only in retrospect. I do recall the agony at the time, too. There have been many, many people over the years who have disrupted the boards for a few months...
 
Maybe we should have a third mod again? I remember we used to have Cat, Etoile and KC at one point.

I realize it still wouldn't work instantenously, but perhaps a little faster.

But I still think the best way to handle things like the one that's being discussed in this thread is to simply tell the poster that kind of behavior is not ok. Most stop after that (until some of them start again). That's instantenous and doesn't add to the workload of the mods. They have lots to do as it is already.

Yup, whatever the amount of mods I still don't see how it would be nicer to just report people than assuming that they want to play by the rules and giving them the chace to change their behaviour accordingly.
 
Back
Top