Hi guys...

Re: moving on

steppenwolf said:
folks
i am sorry if i gave literotica the sole impression that the site somehow hurt my feelings. it did not!!!
Te nada, steppenwolf. I'm glad you got it sorted out.
the subs i see advertising for a dom/em always state they want to give their everything to their 'owner'. some even go so far as being totally humiliated, with feces smeared on and eaten, pissed on and pinched poked and slashed up, and even gang fucked. for their master. i do not have any problem with any of that since it is consensual.
Geezus gods, man, where the HELL are you wandering in your searching around into BDSM sexuality?

First off, please remember that there's a difference in the minds of most of us concerning the definition of a submissive versus a slave. For most of us, the line between the two is a matter of degree to which the bottom (submissive/slave) is willing to cede control to the Top (Dominant).

Secondly, please remember that the element of humiliation in sexual play is important to many bottoms/submissives/slaves. We don't all want the same thing from our humiliation, though, and some of the things you might want and need are just not going to appeal to me at all.

If i don't like something that you like, then i smile politely and tell you so. If i don't want that kind of humiliation, then i don't spend time establishing a bond with someone who needs, likes, and wants that kind of humiliation. We all need different stuff. No one's needs are inherently better or worse than anyone else's needs, only different and something we'd like to try or not.

Even those who need and want feces smeared on their faces, a thing i would not do at all ever, are deserving of our acceptance as long as they seek to express that aspect of thier sexual needs with people who need and want the same thing. How are they harming us if they play in that way, if they don't force us to play with them?

Acceptance, inclusion, tolerance... these are the words and attributes we use with each other here in BDSMland. Don't do it if you don't want to, but don't down other people as long as they are playing in a safe, sane, and consensual manner.
so, my question is why is it a shock to them when their dom/me moves on?
It's always a shock to us when a relationship ends and it's not an ending we sought, is it not? Why should these people be any diferent in their human expectations of thier relationships than you or i?
doesn’t a sub set them up for extreme mental anguished or pain by putting all their happiness into some body else’s control and not their own?
You're lost in the stereotypes, steppenwolf.

None of us puts all our happiness into someone else's control. We *always* retain the responsibility to directly influence and control the happiness level in all our human relationships, whether they be sexual, loving, familial, work-related, etc.

We might give away our control over the details of the relationship in major or minor ways, but (listen up now) in all good BDSM relationships, it is the duty and the responsibility of both partners to work toward the everyday and ongoing health of the relationship.

All good BDSM relationships are relationships first, and then they're BDSM.

As in any human relationship, it is the work of both involved to keep the relationship healthy and meeting the needs of both parties.
i am asking this because i myself cant imagine ever relying on someone else for all my happiness anymore. it always goes away. either they moved on or one even died. still they moved on. either way i was still by alone. i too would like to have a sub, but i sure do not want to cause pain if i were to die. i don not believe any sub no matter how masochistic wants to be left alone for their pain fix. does this make any sense or is it even pertinate here.
Life is full of changes. If we sit on the sidelines and wait for the carousel to stop, we miss the ride. If we take a chance and make a flying leap trying to jump on the glittering whirling twirling thing, we might trip and fall, oh yes, but we'll be on the carousel, won't we? We'll be riding the ride, not standing and watching and wishing.

That's my take on living my life, anyway.

One has to just do it.
i play good with others but i never could color within the lines. moreover, most of my thinking is outside of the box. [/B]
Good for you. I'm firmly convinced that most of us are this way since none of us can ever agree on just where those pesky lines are, anyway.
 
Last edited:
"Originally posted by Dhalgren
I know Isabella Thorne is totally joking...but it does bring up a thought..

I always wonder why people assume a sub is submissive in absolutely all things..as well as being demure at all times to all people.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm certainly not demure and submissive at all times in all corners of my life.

I'm a sexual submissive. I offer my submission only grudgingly, and then only to a single carefully chosen Dominant. It is only within the boundaries of what we create, that Dominant and i, that i have the freedom to submit as i ache to and need and must. It is only within the boundaries of what lies between us that i can let loose of my everyday passing-as-nilla self and be the woman i truly am but have to hide most of the time from most of the eyes that pass over me. "


ummmmmm Miss Cym ... IMHO ... a sub can also have a sense of humour ...

lighten up darling .... as Dhalgren pointed out ... I WAS JOKING ....

geez ... you think you would know me by now .... get me by now???? .. lmao .... nescafé cherie? lmao again ... :D
 
It's odd

I spend one day pretty much gone, and things change drastically. Never even knew there was a monster thread for BDSM before today and reading about it being closed. Well, even as I'm relatively new to Lit, I'd love to offer My help whenever and wherever possible.

I love the idea of the new forum, and all the new threads that are already here.
 
Glad to see you posting here, steppenwolf and badmatt!

Steppenwolf: I will offer apologies now. If you read many of my threads,you will find that I use the term "wannabe Doms". I wish to clarify that term. It is NOT in reference to inexperienced Doms. Rather, I use it to reference Doms who show little, if any respect for subs. I will edit that term from my posts and post something with more clarity. Thank you for pointing this out to me, whether or not your concerns had anything to do with my posts. :)

Welcome and please, feel free to continue posting, asking questions or just hanging out.

badmatt: Hi there! Feel free to jump in , offer your two cents or liven things up a bit at will. Welcome!
 
MissTaken said:
Steppenwolf: I will offer apologies now. If you read many of my threads,you will find that I use the term "wannabe Doms". I wish to clarify that term. It is NOT in reference to inexperienced Doms. Rather, I use it to reference Doms who show little, if any respect for subs. I will edit that term from my posts and post something with more clarity. Thank you for pointing this out to me, whether or not your concerns had anything to do with my posts. :)

MissTaken...as usual, you're a wonder! :)

Steppenwolf...don't be discouraged. You're going to hear the term "wannabes" in connection with Doms and subs a lot - more with Doms than subs.

All I'd add to MissTaken's comment that the biggest thing, above what she's mentioned, that get folks labeled as "wannabe" Doms (or anything else, for that matter) is not only their lack of respect, but their lack of willingness to actually learn about being a Dom. Most of the times, it's about guys who just want some rough sex or want someone to say "Yes Sir" and "No Sir".

You can usually pick those guys out in a hot second. You're not one of them, trust me. ;)
 
JazzManJim said:


MissTaken...as usual, you're a wonder! :)

Steppenwolf...don't be discouraged. You're going to hear the term "wannabes" in connection with Doms and subs a lot - more with Doms than subs.

All I'd add to MissTaken's comment that the biggest thing, above what she's mentioned, that get folks labeled as "wannabe" Doms (or anything else, for that matter) is not only their lack of respect, but their lack of willingness to actually learn about being a Dom. Most of the times, it's about guys who just want some rough sex or want someone to say "Yes Sir" and "No Sir".

You can usually pick those guys out in a hot second. You're not one of them, trust me. ;)

Hell! I should have had you write that post for me.

That is exactly what I was trying to say and nearly did in one of the rewrites I did.

Thanks, Jim!
 
MissTaken

THanks for the welcome. I plan to try to keep things lively when possible.

Might be coming up on an interesting week or two for Me to be posting. An old friend of mine (Kimmie is her name) is bringing someone new to the lifestyle to Denver for a two week vacation, Kimmie's been with her friend for several months, but her friend only recently told her about her desire to explore her submissiveness. Should be a fun couple weeks.
 
Oh badmatt! You don't have to feel you've missed out on the Monster thread! It's still here, near the bottom of the forum, waiting for those who have nothing at all to do for the next week to read it, beginning to end.

Have fun!
We'll send in care packages so you won't die alone and hungry while you're in there, tunnelling through the depths.
;)
 
MissTaken said:


Hell! I should have had you write that post for me.

That is exactly what I was trying to say and nearly did in one of the rewrites I did.

Thanks, Jim!

My pleasure, hon. :)

I will say, though, in my experience, that wannabes are the very bane of a Dom's existence. There are just so many more of them than there are true, genuine Doms that the subs pretty much begin with the assumption that the Dom is a wannabe.

It's safer that way for them, and I don't blame them one bit for it. :)

But, if you listen and learn and just get social a bit, your true colors come out and you're fine. :)

I suppose that we BDSMers develop a good nose for the real and the false. We're building a good crew of real 'uns in here! :D
 
Back
Top