Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
You're starting to bother me.
I've never seen Secretary. She's not exhibiting eating disorder traits, she's lost some weight. Let's not jump to conclusions here. It doesn't even appear that she's trying to lose any weight, she just is.
I've never hit her because she wasn't eating. I don't want to humiliate her because she's not eating. She is eating, she's just also losing weight. And I'm angry because when I show concern about it she feels like she's being treated like a child and acts out (like a child).
And yes, all problems I don't understand are insane girl problems. Like why you feel the need to act like a miserable bitch.
You're contradicting yourself. If you're worried about an underlying psychological issue for weight loss, then that's a disordered behavior to some degree. A lot of people have disordered relationships to food, not everyone is going all full on Karen Carpenter. Her reaction being an over-reaction points in this direction too - if you're honest with yourself, you'd probably agree. People don't get volatile about concern unless the behavior bothers them too, usually.
I'm calling it like I see it like everyone else is. If that's being a miserable bitch, so be it.
Controlling things you aren't comfortable having discussions about is really playing darts in the dark. You said you don't have deep conversations, well, you're playing with deep shit now.
Last edited:
). I gave her a quick rundown of the kinds of things that would ensure her a severe ass beating from me; I then asked if there was anything she really truly did not want me to do to her, and she said anal and anything involving watersports or feces. The former I'm a bit disappointed about; the latter is something that's never interested me.