adrina
Heretic
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2017
- Posts
- 24,075
It isn’t even close
Exactly.
I bust the OP's chops on a regular basis. But he's correct that Tim Walz is nowhere near as extreme as the right portrays him to be.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It isn’t even close
He was vice president.
And my whole point is that Walz being extreme or not is irrelevant to the job he will have. That's it. If you're voting.thinking differently, you probably should retake civics
If you're saying that Vance should be enough in himself to possibly disqualify Trump, okay, but it wasn't clear to me that this was what you meant. Are you disagreeing with II74, then, on his take that it's immaterial?I’m saying that the Republicans have nominated the oldest presidential candidate ever. He is in poor health. He is in mental decline. That’s not me giving hyperbole or a bias, it’s clear for all to see. Please do not make me defend Sarah Palin by saying that as a governor of Alaska she at least had, delegated powers more so than anything Vance has displayed.
You just gave your perspective on Tim Walz. My claim is that you cannot give the same for Vance because his cupboard is bare as far as any leadership or legislative history. As a senator he has cosigned to some bills with Senator Warnock, but Vance is not running on any kind of bipartisanship. No one knows about those efforts. John McCain was always not in the best of health post Vietnam, but no one questioned his mental faculties to be the 44th president except, like you noted, that he picked Sarah Palin to be his running mate.If you're saying that Vance should be enough in himself to possibly disqualify Trump, okay, but it wasn't clear to me that this was what you meant. Are you disagreeing with II74, then, on his take that it's immaterial?
Where is this stated as a policy?!!"mandatory gun buybacks"?