Interracial Non-consent Story. Thoughts?

[sr71plt]

Cynicism? I'm the one being optimistic on this thread on the worth of nearly every story on Lit. to some group of writers and readers--and on their right not to be harrassed and instructed by others.

 

[PennLady]

Not this time. As I said below, I am trying to work out the difference between a "rape" story and a "rape fantasy" story. I wasn't disagreeing with you, only trying to probe your response a little deeper. It is beginning to appear as though this is but another example of a distinction without a difference.

Seems to me a "rape story" would be one in which the woman (well, usually) is forced to have sex against her will and does not enjoy it.

A "rape fantasy story" would be one where the woman is more acting out a fantasy with someone and pretending. But that's just my take.

 

[PennLady]

Why? Because to some in this forum, this distinction is crucial. "Rape fantasy" stories are acceptable for publication on this site. "Rape" stories are apparently disallowed. Since I am assuming that they are all fictional accounts (would anyone write a rape confession story?), if there is any distinction between the two it has to be something other than "rape" stories are true but "rape fantasy" stories are imagined.

I may want to write such a story some day, but I don't want to cross the line into the forbidden zone.

I think you're wrong. The "Non-con/Reluctance" category would encompass rape under "non-consent." Now, many people may write stories where the woman ultimately enjoys the rape, but that's total fantasy to me, and unbelievable, and so I don't read them. They're welcome to write them, but it's not my thing.

I think you may be arguing the wrong thing, or in the wrong way.