Rotadom
Satan's Plaything
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2017
- Posts
- 8,775
Lock him up!No, just wondering if you’re suggesting there may have been a crime.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lock him up!No, just wondering if you’re suggesting there may have been a crime.
No, just wondering if you’re suggesting there may have been a crime.
I'm just gonna leave this here.The evidence is that he DID get his cut because Hunter whined about it and the shell corporation money trail leads to Joe.
A point which is further buttressed by the $200K check from Joe's brother. An amount which, coincidentally, equals 10% of the value of a loan Jim received because of his connection with Joe.
I'm just gonna leave this here.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/o...&cvid=feecd5610bb74f958bbbe272c8183811&ei=106
Butt Hunter!!!DEFLECTION ALERT!!!
DEFLECTION ALERT!!!
I'm not a member of Congress. THEY'RE the ones investigating if there was a crime. Which means it's more than a "suggestion."
See: Reasonable Suspicion
And see: Probable Cause
The evidence and documents the House committee has released seems to support that theory too.
So given all of that, are you admitting that Joe got 10%?
Your first post in this thread about keeping trump off the Colorado ballot.So where do you stand on Hunter giving "The Big Guy" 10%?
Twat did you say? I cunt hear you.DEFLECTION ALERT!!!
DEFLECTION ALERT!!!
Why are so adamant about having me admit to something I have no knowledge about?
Do you support the congressional investigation and impeachment of DJT? Did you give any credence to the Dem house committees when they were investigating?
You’re like Joe Tacopina about Stormy Daniels - whichever side you’re on at the moment is how you’ll argue.
Right, you're neither. What you are, is a carbon water swilling imbecile. Entertaining for the most part, boring and only due ridicule after.Sorry, I'm not a witness and this isn't the courtroom so your questions lack relevance.
Dudly, you're not a witness to reality.Sorry, I'm not a witness and this isn't the courtroom so your questions lack relevance.
Sorry, I'm not a witness and this isn't the courtroom so your questions lack relevance.
It's a pre arrest admission by ol' Hunter himself as supported by a whiny email stored on the Laptop From Hell.
So why are you here testifying?
Short term it helps Trump, but if using the 14th amendment to ban him from the ballot is allowed to stand more states will do so, and that will crush his chances of winning with the electoral college votes.
^ someone doesn't know the difference between testimony and political commentary.
Biden is the current president of the United States. He will be in office even after the election is over. You need to explain to us, if he is in office, why should he allow for the certification of the election in favor of Trump?There are 11 progressive states. Winning all 11 by removing Trump from the ballot will not give a majority in the electoral college.
Conversely, if the remaining 39 red states remove Biden under the same 14th Amendment pretext he has no chance of winning reelection. Nor does any Democrat in the future.
This is the way of the math and why you see top Dems telling the States to not go down that road. It's political suicide for the entire party.
So your commentary is based on political bullshit that you know doesn’t pass the muster that you want apply to political bullshit from the other side?
Understood. Carry on, counselor.
Commentary is called discussion, not testimony. Thus it requires no courtroom or legal representation. That you somehow continue to believe the 2 are 1 and the same illustrates that it's your brainlessness where the problem lies.
That is rich coming from you!
You were just recently demanding that I make a judgement about stuff that allegedly came from Hunters’ laptop!
Weasel along now….
No one asked to you pass judgement on anything. That would be like asking Dylan Mulvaney to taste Wat's weasel casserole while blindfolded.
So given all of that, are you admitting that Joe got 10%?
Forgot this already?
There's a difference between you admitting something and you being asked to judge something. Which once again highlights how little you understand anything and everything.