Aah yes .....all those implications.
??
Your ascription is noted.
You're the one who says that human being coming from third world countries have different aspects that you denigrate.
So you're saying you have no issue with people migrating here from third world countries
So you acknowledge that people from third world countries are able to claim asylum under current laws.
Lol.....
Does this change their ability, under the law, to migrate here?
You're the one, obviously, who is upset. Or perhaps your caps lock is not indicative of your tone?
Nope.
Lol.....
Because that is what you are doing
Well, no different, in any ways that really matter, from an Irishman in the 1840s.
It's not a "religion" AJ.Liberals are perfectly sane unlike either James Carville (or myself).
It is a religion and their behavior proves it from dogma and ritual trappings to proselytization and the fervent, frenetic persecution of heretics.
In the name of the poor and the children and THE FUTURE.
So you're working to change asylum laws good for you
The laws don't stipulate that asylum seekers are able to violate other laws without legal ramifications.
Good deflection.Yup. I mean couldn't be anymore plain and simple about it.
Like saying "biological sex is a real thing" and watching the "educated" people wig the fuck out over it. It's a guaranteed great show of a CD meltdown every time.
Asylum is part of immigration
Where in the law is that defined?
So your use of caps lock is not indicative of tone?
So the migrants in Springfield are not eating pets.
Christianity doesn't. And what else distinguishes the illiterate savage 19th-Century Irish peasant from the Congolese of your hypothetical?
China has usually had a stable society, for thousands of years, with no one consensus religion defining their culture.
Volley, serve. Taylor Lorenz fires back hard at Gateway Pundit and other fainting couch MAGAts:
emoji before UHC was smart enough to take the post down.The CEO's killing brought a little known fact to light: UHC is by far the most unpopular major health insurance company in America. They routinely deny claims (32%....far, far above the next highest insurance company). Many folk's claims are automatically denied by the company rudimentary Artificial Intelligence LLM, which has an abysmal "hallucination" rate (it takes the place of, you know, human claims analysts).
So, you and your 23,000 support his murder?Volley, serve. Taylor Lorenz fires back hard at Gateway Pundit and other fainting couch MAGAts:
Yes, "we" want insurance executives dead
No, that doesn't mean people should murder them. But if you've watched a loved one suffer and die from insurance denial, it's normal to wish the people responsible would suffer the same fate.
She noted that 23,000 people responded to United Healthcare's Facebook post announcing the death of their CEO with a
The money quote:
The CEO's killing brought a little known fact to light: UHC is by far the most unpopular major health insurance company in America. They routinely deny claims (32%....far, far above the next highest insurance company). Many folk's claims are automatically denied by the company rudimentary Artificial Intelligence LLM, which has an abysmal "hallucination" rate (it takes the place of, you know, human claims analysts).
So yeah, a lot of folks won't shed a tear that the leader of that shitshow got his comeuppance. I certainly won't.
Just three people, or as you guys have been putting it recently, The Three Alts of AJ...
I don't support murder (as you well know) but you have to admit it's kinda amusingly ironic.
It is one of the more delusional statements of the morning.
That's the first time I've seen you in full makeup, Rob. Thanks for that. All of my suspicions have been vindicated.I don't support murder (as you well know) but you have to admit it's kinda amusingly ironic.
I'd feel the same way if Tangerine Palpatine were to choke to death on a burrito.
But don't let my feelings get in the way of your pearl-clutchin' situational outrage.......
