haldir
Really Really Experienced
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2004
- Posts
- 488
Literacy has always been a political tool. In the UK there was a great outcry and debate in parliament in the 19th century when it was proposed to make elementary education compulsory (and thus literacy as universal as possible). The ruling classes looked at educated workers as a threat - which they were and are thankfully.
Early trade unions saw education and literacy as an absoulte must and founded the "athaneum" movement where working men (and sadly it was mostly men to start with) could "improve" themselves by reading and studying. The suffragette movement also encouraged women to educate themselves and increase their literacy.
Dickens deliberately serialised his books in papers read by working people.
However, prior to the industrial revolution, reading was the domain of the ruling elite and church. Theatre was where working people were exposed to literature. WHich was why, of course, it was subject to so much sensorship and repression.
My ex-wife's Grandfather was a miner and he was as well read as any man that I have met - he introduced me to several writers that I would not have been exposed to without him.
Early trade unions saw education and literacy as an absoulte must and founded the "athaneum" movement where working men (and sadly it was mostly men to start with) could "improve" themselves by reading and studying. The suffragette movement also encouraged women to educate themselves and increase their literacy.
Dickens deliberately serialised his books in papers read by working people.
However, prior to the industrial revolution, reading was the domain of the ruling elite and church. Theatre was where working people were exposed to literature. WHich was why, of course, it was subject to so much sensorship and repression.
My ex-wife's Grandfather was a miner and he was as well read as any man that I have met - he introduced me to several writers that I would not have been exposed to without him.