FungiUg
Waves at Cats
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2001
- Posts
- 10,242
Etoile said:I find it interesting that jurisdictions (NZ, Vermont) offer things like relationship acts and civil unions. It's an issue of "separate but equal" to me, not unlike segregation in the United States. I wonder how long it will take before civil unions are considered unconstitutional and full marriage is awarded to gay couples.
Me, I'd like to see it go the other way. Make the only legal element of a "marriage" the name change (i.e. equivalent to a deed poll), and anything else is simply the ceremony, not legal. Since married or not, the rights of relationships are covered under the relationship act, why do we need a separate legal status for married?