Money slaves.

shy slave said:
Etoile, I do not doubt there are many people out there who would willingly pay to get your attention.

They may even pay in 'Hello Kitty' items!
Eeeee! Well then, I am available for service! (Check out this claw machine I saw in Las Vegas!)
 
shy slave said:
LOL

Were you in heaven just by seeing it??
I was both elated and crushed. I was thrilled that such a thing existed, but disappointed that I never win at those things! I figured taking a picture was better than losing 50 cents to the machine.
 
When i hear financial slave i just think of a Dom who wants to control the subs money. i would be wary of giving up my money to someone unless i knew them very well and was sure that they weren't in it for the money. i would think that submissives who are into TPE would give their money to their Doms if told to. It's just another form of control.
 
Kailey_86 said:
When i hear financial slave i just think of a Dom who wants to control the subs money. i would be wary of giving up my money to someone unless i knew them very well and was sure that they weren't in it for the money. i would think that submissives who are into TPE would give their money to their Doms if told to. It's just another form of control.
I agree that TPE partners and owned slaves do give their money to their PYL's - it's part of the dynamic. I think the idea of a financial slave or money slave is different, though - sometimes that's the ONLY control exerted. Sometimes they're not even in a relationship, it's just about the money taking. Financial control is definitely a part of many D/s relationships, but financial "slaves" are a different thing IMHO.

The motivation for this is certainly peculiar. I think most financial slaves already have a lot of money - nobody who is poor is going to let someone else control where their money goes, unless it's part of a "I can't control my own spending, please monitor me" situation. Similarly, I can't imagine anybody who wanted to be a financial slave would trust their money to someone who didn't have a good head on their shoulders - that is, someone who was financially independent and didn't need their money. It's definitely one of the more unique D/s dynamics, I think.
 
Etoile said:
I agree that TPE partners and owned slaves do give their money to their PYL's - it's part of the dynamic. I think the idea of a financial slave or money slave is different, though - sometimes that's the ONLY control exerted. Sometimes they're not even in a relationship, it's just about the money taking. Financial control is definitely a part of many D/s relationships, but financial "slaves" are a different thing IMHO.

The motivation for this is certainly peculiar. I think most financial slaves already have a lot of money - nobody who is poor is going to let someone else control where their money goes, unless it's part of a "I can't control my own spending, please monitor me" situation. Similarly, I can't imagine anybody who wanted to be a financial slave would trust their money to someone who didn't have a good head on their shoulders - that is, someone who was financially independent and didn't need their money. It's definitely one of the more unique D/s dynamics, I think.
Ahh, i see the difference now. i don't think i can wrap my mind around that one, being a financial slave. i personally would get no satisfation out of giving up control of my money and nothing else. That is very interesting though.
 
I know of one fellow who really wanted to find a mistress. It's not an easy thing to do for many. I guess you could say he was in sub frenzy.

Well, he thought he found one. Summoned his courage to write the best e-mail he could to her and waiting on tender hooks to see if she would reply. She did.

It was a whirlwind after that. They were going to get together in person. If things worked out she'd accept him. He was so happy. I was happy for him.

Until, she pulled the "send me X amount of money to prove you're serious" card. Then he felt like he'd been lied to. He still wondered if there was any way it was legit. To me, it's not, unless that is his kink as well as "Dom's". JMO.

Fury :rose:
 
Etoile said:
I agree that TPE partners and owned slaves do give their money to their PYL's - it's part of the dynamic. I think the idea of a financial slave or money slave is different, though - sometimes that's the ONLY control exerted. Sometimes they're not even in a relationship, it's just about the money taking. Financial control is definitely a part of many D/s relationships, but financial "slaves" are a different thing IMHO.

The motivation for this is certainly peculiar. I think most financial slaves already have a lot of money - nobody who is poor is going to let someone else control where their money goes, unless it's part of a "I can't control my own spending, please monitor me" situation. Similarly, I can't imagine anybody who wanted to be a financial slave would trust their money to someone who didn't have a good head on their shoulders - that is, someone who was financially independent and didn't need their money. It's definitely one of the more unique D/s dynamics, I think.
Ahh, i see the difference now. i don't think i can wrap my mind around that one, being a financial slave. i personally would get no satisfation out of giving up control of my money and nothing else. That is very interesting though.
 
Weighing on Money Slavery/Financial Fetish

I don't post a lot -- hell, I don't even have an Avitar -- but as someone experienced in the financial fetishes and money slavery both as a practitioner and (former) mentor, here goes.

I agree with netzach and catalina_francisco in their tolerance of this kink as just another kink of which we need to be tolerant. It is funny that a toilet slave, for example, will snicker and roll his eyes at a foot fetishist "Feet? How silly that!?"

In the case of the financial fetishes, the fact is that there are the good, the bad and the ugly ( = evil) just as there are in every fetish.

As mentioned, money = power. Money also equals "penance payment," for some real or imagined guilt on the part of a submissive/slave to a greater power (usually a woman), in hopes that (usually) he will be absolved of the pain he carries around. Does he ever actually GET this absolution? And if he ever did, would/could he ACCEPT it? Usually not. It becomes an on-going (and often life-long) ritual that he needs to keep his life in balance.

The women (most often dominant or sadistic) who are in to this fetish may be professional, semi-pro, or simply amateurs who like the gifts or extra money or power or rush of having a guy who will send them money and other neat stuff.

Some guys are "gifters," and others are "banks" and others are "Human ATMs."

Some guys need for this gifting to be voluntary and appreciated, and others need it to be coerced and ignored. The spectrum is filled on both ends and in the middle.

It can be extraordinarily hot if the connection is right between the Domme/sadist and the sub/slave/masochist.

The most cohesive, compenhensive, sane site on this fetish is www.financialslavery.net

My 2005 and 2006 stories deal with aspects of this fetish -- my kink was non-consensual -- so you might want to search them out for more knowledge on the subject.

Note: I am no longer into this kink/fetish/lifestyle because, frankly, it was like a crack addiction. It came close to ruining my life, BUT that doesn't mean it has to ruin yours! In moderation, just like an occasional joint or drink, it can be quite enjoyable.


Conquered
 
Conquered, thank you SO much for posting this. It's hard to understand rare fetishes without hearing from someone with experience in them. I really, really appreciate you taking the time to share with us and teach us.
 
Wow! I'm learning new stuff everyday since I began posting here. Didn't know this sort of kink was out there. I too can't get my head around it but hey! Still new here, learning a lot from you people and loving it. Thanks!

Netzach said:
The people I've entered into this kind of activity are, overwhelmingly, elite, more educated than I am (this is not common) and extremely aggressive go-getters that the world would not recognize as submissive. I enjoy most being able to say "ah, if they saw you like I saw you" and seeing the excitement that inspires.

Off topic here but just had to comment. This I totally get and relate to. Not that I'm an elite or an aggressive go-getter... yet. :D lol I'm just normally mistaken as a dominant person, through my own actions of course. :) Love the idea of people seeing a dominant-like person being controlled by a more dominant one.

We're all into so many different kinks. It's nice to see the "diversity." :catroar:
 
Thank you Etoile

. . . for your comments.

I like sharing what I know, just no longer in the "up close and personal" manner that got me into some extraordinary trouble.


Conquered
 
jasonlf said:
I think I'm going to create a domme account on collarme and make some dollars, yo.

;)

Just kidding!


Ha ha, don't think I haven't thought of it.
 
Back
Top