Bramblethorn
Sleep-deprived
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2012
- Posts
- 17,772
Any rewrites at all will have to include another review by Laurel, slowing down the process for all submitting, won't they? Otherwise, an author could initially submit a story that was mild and later make it unacceptable here by minor adding and changing in a self-editing process.
Absolutely, but vetting an edit should be a lot faster than vetting a new story if the system's set up sensibly.
For instance, if somebody edits the Wikipedia article on Offenbach, I don't have to read through the whole article closely to see what's changed. I can get a view that highlights the edits, presented in context, like this:
So for an edit that's just fixing a few typos, it should be very easy for Laurel to look at the comparison, confirm that they're not changing an "18" to a "13" or similar, and approve it.
It's not foolproof; an inventive author could make changes which depend on context elsewhere in the story. But that kind of thing can easily get missed even on the initial posting with no later edits required.