normal v creep

The quote is being taken out of context because he wasn't talking about women stuck in violent marriages but about THE CHILDREN in those marriages.

Also, if you actually READ THE ACTUAL FUCKING WORDS you'll notice that what you're trying to say he said, isn't exactly as you're making it out to be even without the missing context.




Show me where he's advocating that women remain in violent marriages in that quote. No extra words or paraphrases, show us where he advocated that women remain in a violent marriage.

Then there's this bit:



That bit, which was conveniently left out of your argument, indicates that Vance is discussing the children of divorced couples, and not "violent marriages."

So, not only do you LIE directly, you lie by omission and fabrication.

🙄

Jizz Davenport Vance FAILED when he DID suggest women should stay in violent relationships, AND that they should keep their kids in them as wel.

Derpy just FAILED as usual.

😑

👉 Derpy 🤣

🇺🇸
 
This thread, like the Harris campaign, is already flailing for traction and not getting it.
Have you seen DJT Truth Social stock lately? Down about 11% in the last month and about 40% in the last three months. Hmmmm... I wonder what happened in the last month? Anyway, keep investing in DJT. You'll be too busy picking through garbage to be on here. If Trump croaks the stock goes to zero.
 
Last edited:
He already did "I am not weird."


Can we get him to do "I am not a creep!" ?
 
As usual, the Left fabricates an out of context lie to wrongly smear someone.


https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2022...rting-abusive-marriages-after-viral-comments/


Once more shining a glaring light on the lack of character of those who espouse such lies.
This comes from Vance's discussion:

"In Vance’s book “Hillbilly Elegy,” he referenced growing up in a home of alcoholism and substance abuse, referencing it as “violent,” as well. His grandparents’ relationship was “incredibly chaotic,” he added in the Sept. statement.

“They fought a lot. They were very, you know, earlier in their lives, they were even violent with each other, but they never got divorced,” Vance said in a 2020 interview with the Chris Buskirk Show. “There’s this weird sense of just devotion for its own sake, that I think has its downsides, to be honest, it certainly has downsides, but I think is a very useful trait. And something I just don’t see enough among the professional class in this country.”

Vance's words tell his story quite clearly. If you read the statement, you can draw the conclusion others have about it. He supports his claim that parents should stay together even in violent situations, using his own grandparents as an illustration.

  • Vance acknowledges it has its downsides [staying together in a violent situation.]
  • That's a weird sense of devotion, he says.
  • JD takes some weird sense of pride that amidst violence between his grandparents, violence was okay because they stayed together for the sake of raising kids.
  • It is evident from his belief that staying together as a family unit amidst violence is better than living apart and diminishing such violence.
  • The conversation isn't about amicable divorce and raising kids at all.
  • It is JD Vance's view that even in violent situations, a woman should not separate from her husband for the sake of their children.
JD Vance is just as weird as his idea that it is better to tolerate abuse, so kids are somehow raised 'normally' in such an environment and not impacted by witnessing the violence. It is pretty well known that exposure to violence as a child can impact a child's adult behavior in a negative way.

Arphy, it is not a Leftist out-of-context rant; it is within context and easily grasped by objective readers. You are not one of them.
 
Back
Top