Zuluboy,
Somewhere in the dim past I read something about two scenarios for a society to fall apart. In one, the "elite" is eliminated by some factor (in the French Revolution it was "la guillotine"). In the other, the working class is eliminated (as in the bubonic plague in medival Europe). Either way, the society as a whole is in for serious turmoil. From what I've heard, the greatest incidence of HIV infection in some countries is in the educated portion of the population. I read somewhere that the infection rate for medical students in Kenya is higher than for the general population.
My point is that both scenarios appear to be possibilities in much of Africa, and in Thailand as well. Unless there is some affordable treatment made available, these countries will be depopulated in the near future. Just the task of burying 60-75% of the population would tax the resources of even a wealthy nation, which these are definitely not. Bubonic plague only killed 40% of Europe's population, and disposing of the dead was one of the ways it was transmitted. That is not so much an issue with AIDS, but large numbers of unburied bodies present numerous health risks.
As for the rate of population replacement, how many of the births will be of HIV positive babies, starting the cycle all over again?
Given the dangers of the situation, I can safely say that there is little that could entice me to even consider a visit to Africa, even if I could afford it.
[This message has been edited by skibum (edited 05-08-2000).]
Somewhere in the dim past I read something about two scenarios for a society to fall apart. In one, the "elite" is eliminated by some factor (in the French Revolution it was "la guillotine"). In the other, the working class is eliminated (as in the bubonic plague in medival Europe). Either way, the society as a whole is in for serious turmoil. From what I've heard, the greatest incidence of HIV infection in some countries is in the educated portion of the population. I read somewhere that the infection rate for medical students in Kenya is higher than for the general population.
My point is that both scenarios appear to be possibilities in much of Africa, and in Thailand as well. Unless there is some affordable treatment made available, these countries will be depopulated in the near future. Just the task of burying 60-75% of the population would tax the resources of even a wealthy nation, which these are definitely not. Bubonic plague only killed 40% of Europe's population, and disposing of the dead was one of the ways it was transmitted. That is not so much an issue with AIDS, but large numbers of unburied bodies present numerous health risks.
As for the rate of population replacement, how many of the births will be of HIV positive babies, starting the cycle all over again?
Given the dangers of the situation, I can safely say that there is little that could entice me to even consider a visit to Africa, even if I could afford it.
[This message has been edited by skibum (edited 05-08-2000).]