Tzara
Continental
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2005
- Posts
- 7,661
I hope you mean this as a statement of what your personal preferences in poetry are and not a definition of what a poem is. It's pretty easy to disprove your statement unless you want to adopt a "private language" definition (i.e., something like "the word means what I want it to mean"). I mean, that kind of definition wipes out virtually everything that bookstores, libraries, poetry journals, and academic departments would think of as poetry. Pretty much makes the term meaningless.A poem is written documentation of what you are feeling at any given moment.
It is notoriously hard to define what poetry is, but that statement is simply wrong, I think.
Now I agree with this, as referring to an individual poem. Poems are not "right" or "wrong." Nor is, for example, a painting or a musical composition. Art is not something that has One Proper Answer, like a calculus problem.It is never wrong.
Poems are, though, "good" or "bad," though there is room for argument as to which poems are good and why and which are bad and why.
Perhaps not (see above re right/wrong and good/bad).You can't change or "correct" a poem.
You can though, often, improve it. Change it to better express whatever the author was trying to express. This happens all the time.
Well, again, I would disagree with this statement for, I think, pretty obvious reasons.A poem shouldn't be written to please other people, or even to please yourself...it simply just is what it is. Those are the best, and never need to be changed or validated.
Do you really believe this, or are you just being contentious? Do you read any poetry (i.e., by someone published--not just things here)? I'd be curious as to who, if you do.
By the way, is this the right reference, or am I missing something?