Question about the Logistics of Filming Porn in Public

I always assumed they just slipped the bus driver some cash at the end of his shift.

Also: the Japanese train molestation thing became a bit too squicky for me a few years back with all the reports of it happening for real, to underage girls, in India.
Which in comparison is nothing compared to what's going in the UK, hopefully we don't get a slew of gang rape videos based on it.
 
It could be an actual public bus that was rented out. Or an older one that went up for auction, so no longer used for the public, but still the exact bus.

RR thinks he knows everything, he doesn't.
I said that exact thing. "Sold for peanuts" = auction.

The assumption that it's an actual in-use or even out-of-service but still owned piece of public transit is the least likely scenario. More trouble than it's worth when they can find one that's for rent, or buy one for peanuts, film 1000 vids in it, and sell the thing six months later. Especially if it's an actual porn company and not some independent OF girl.
 
"Porn in Public" is inherently uncomfortable not so much for the exhibitionism as for the issue of consent. In the case of the "woman groped on the train" videos, I assume they're all fiction, but they typically depict a young woman who is subjected to groping, or more, without her express consent, but usually with her acquiescence and enjoyment. It's icky for many, but the element of discomfort is part of what makes it erotic for some.

There's also the element of consent with the public audience in the background. Is it morally acceptable to perform in an erotic way in public without obtaining the consent of people around one? Probably most people have their own personal sliding scale: it's OK to do some things, but not others.

In fiction, we can dodge these issues, because no real people are affected. But with video, then there is always the reality, or at least the risk, of people in public seeing things that offend them and that they did not consent to see. What are the moral duties of the creators of this type of porn? I don't have a clear answer, but it's an interesting question.
 
My post to the thread needs several tags: porn shoot, car sex, backseat.

The moral of the story is perhaps that all sorts of things are possible when it comes to porn, sex, etc.

I was working in a garage in San Francisco and the event occurred after VHS had arrived but before digital (cheap and easy) camera/film equipment came out.

The owner told me this story, corroborated by others. The bare bones of the story are true, although perhaps some elements of it were exaggerated in the retelling to me.

The garage had a nice looking VW beetle in the shop for extended repairs. It was in the front of the shop and a passerby notices and comments on the car, nice condition, etc.

He asks the shop owner: Do you think it would be possible for us to do a porn shoot in the back of that car?

Owner rolls eyes, now he's heard everything.

What?

A porn shoot.

What's in it for me? (I can hear him saying this.)

No money, but you get to watch.

Owner, not quite believing what he's hearing, shakes his head yes.

The crew and actors come in over the weekend when the shop is closed, set up for a shoot (small crew, so semi-professional). Owner invites the other shop employees to come along, a couple do (hence my verification.)

They do a shoot, using the car as a prop, and manage an extended fuck in the back seat of the car (hard to imagine, not much room back there.) Two guys end up ejaculating on the woman's chest while she's kneeling next to the car.

I was told that 1. "You wouldn't believe the size of the pricks on those guys!" and 2. "they stayed hard unbelievably long." I'll spare you the comments on the woman.

Anyway. I missed the actual event, but it happened, and somewhere out there is a VHS clip of two guys and a woman with a VW beetle serving as an extra. No, the car owner was never told about this.
 
You can rent busses for trips to casinos, other cities (I've been on a couple going to Buffalo for Bills Pats games) and any private event. A site liked Blacked makes enough money to have a budget.

My only thought would be do they tell the owner of the bus what its for?
Was at a business conference and rented a bus for a bunch of us to go to a team dinner. It had a stripper pole in it. They know, or are at least aware of the possibility.
 
My post to the thread needs several tags: porn shoot, car sex, backseat.

The moral of the story is perhaps that all sorts of things are possible when it comes to porn, sex, etc.

I was working in a garage in San Francisco and the event occurred after VHS had arrived but before digital (cheap and easy) camera/film equipment came out.

The owner told me this story, corroborated by others. The bare bones of the story are true, although perhaps some elements of it were exaggerated in the retelling to me.

The garage had a nice looking VW beetle in the shop for extended repairs. It was in the front of the shop and a passerby notices and comments on the car, nice condition, etc.

He asks the shop owner: Do you think it would be possible for us to do a porn shoot in the back of that car?

Owner rolls eyes, now he's heard everything.

What?

A porn shoot.

What's in it for me? (I can hear him saying this.)

No money, but you get to watch.

Owner, not quite believing what he's hearing, shakes his head yes.

The crew and actors come in over the weekend when the shop is closed, set up for a shoot (small crew, so semi-professional). Owner invites the other shop employees to come along, a couple do (hence my verification.)

They do a shoot, using the car as a prop, and manage an extended fuck in the back seat of the car (hard to imagine, not much room back there.) Two guys end up ejaculating on the woman's chest while she's kneeling next to the car.

I was told that 1. "You wouldn't believe the size of the pricks on those guys!" and 2. "they stayed hard unbelievably long." I'll spare you the comments on the woman.

Anyway. I missed the actual event, but it happened, and somewhere out there is a VHS clip of two guys and a woman with a VW beetle serving as an extra. No, the car owner was never told about this.


Imagine seeing your car in something like that? Or a friend's?
I can't imagine... "is that Brad's car? Why is Brad's car being used in a porn shoot?"
 
The bus is probably a set piece owned by a props or production company. One wsll is probably a cutaway so that film crew can move around and access it.
Watch the behind the scenes or making of shows about movies with car chases.
 
Was at a business conference and rented a bus for a bunch of us to go to a team dinner. It had a stripper pole in it. They know, or are at least aware of the possibility.

They rent then out as "Party busses"... as long as they get paid and nothing gets broken why would they care?
Some classmates rented one for Prom instead of a limo, they got told point blank, "we know everyone is underage so no alcohol" but otherwise whatever.
 
The bus is probably a set piece owned by a props or production company. One wsll is probably a cutaway so that film crew can move around and access it.
Watch the behind the scenes or making of shows about movies with car chases.

Saw a YouTube video about a guy who has a private jet fuselage that he rents out for filming. Bunch of "influencers" apparently pay him a few hundred bucks to film their "flight to Vega/Tahiti/Paris on a private jet". Then they head to LAX and fly coach to actually get there.

I suspect he would let you get naughty in there as long as you didn't stain the seats.
 
Saw a YouTube video about a guy who has a private jet fuselage that he rents out for filming. Bunch of "influencers" apparently pay him a few hundred bucks to film their "flight to Vega/Tahiti/Paris on a private jet". Then they head to LAX and fly coach to actually get there.

I suspect he would let you get naughty in there as long as you didn't stain the seats.
I've met someone who owns some vintage cars and fixed them up. He makes money renting them to movie companies just to be seen driving in the background of outdoor shots in period movies.

-Rocco
 
Getting a train is a little more difficult. For the 1967 movie The Incident, a train interior was built in a studio based on the original blueprints. Of course, it probably was mostly lumber, not steel, but it looked perfect. Some old subway cars wind up in private hands in various countries and it might be possible to rent one. In those days, it was hard to get filming permits, but Mayor Lindsay changed all of that,

The New York Transit Authority is very helpful to film crews nowadays, as in Joker which has scenes in real stations. They'll also give you any kind of car you want from the museum fleet. Pure porn would probably get a no-no however.

Joker - 170th Street
 
"Porn in Public" is inherently uncomfortable not so much for the exhibitionism as for the issue of consent. In the case of the "woman groped on the train" videos, I assume they're all fiction, but they typically depict a young woman who is subjected to groping, or more, without her express consent, but usually with her acquiescence and enjoyment. It's icky for many, but the element of discomfort is part of what makes it erotic for some.

There's also the element of consent with the public audience in the background. Is it morally acceptable to perform in an erotic way in public without obtaining the consent of people around one? Probably most people have their own personal sliding scale: it's OK to do some things, but not others.

In fiction, we can dodge these issues, because no real people are affected. But with video, then there is always the reality, or at least the risk, of people in public seeing things that offend them and that they did not consent to see. What are the moral duties of the creators of this type of porn? I don't have a clear answer, but it's an interesting question.

As well as the ethical issue of involving non-consenting bystanders in one's sex life, there's a pragmatic reason for faking this stuff.

How are people going to respond to having an unexpected sex scene play out in front of them? Anything is possible. Calling the cops, punching out the actor, dudes whipping out their non-STI-tested junk and trying to join in, crowding in and blocking the camera angles, whatever. And if somebody wants to fuck up the shoot on purpose, they can pull out a phone and start playing Disney tunes, because releasing a porn video with "Let It Go" on the soundtrack is a legally unwise thing to do.

What film director wants to deal with that kind of bullshit? Time is money and porn is a business. It has to be cheaper to find willing extras for this kind of thing than to have to reshoot because somebody jostled the camera during the money shot.
 
It's not necessarily an actual public bus
Totally this.

Transit agencies let them go and they get bought by others without any redesign of the interior or exterior, maybe with the exception of removing the agency’s branding. You can totally find a bus to rent which has those “public transit” seats and those yellow bars and mobility assist bars and those vertical hold-on pipes.

There are businesses who have whole fleets of these to rent to movie productions, and they would not turn down a porn studio as a client.

Possibly a higher than ordinary cleaning deposit, but possibly not even that.
 
In
I always assumed they just slipped the bus driver some cash at the end of his shift.

Also: the Japanese train molestation thing became a bit too squicky for me a few years back with all the reports of it happening for real, to underage girls, in India.
India has been fucked up in this regard for a long time and Japanese porn probably doesn’t explain the occurrence of this, there.
 
I don’t doubt that. But whoever it was who said it pales in comparison to India and Japan’s public molestation problems doesn’t seem credible on that.

I think we should all be able to agree that all three situations are awful. Not much to be gained by arguing over whether Jeffrey Dahmer was worse than Jack the Ripper.
 
What's going on in the UK? If it came out of 'Tommy Robinson''s mouth, it's a lie.

Loads of places you can hire buses or old train carriages for a day. And if you can hire it, someone will have staged porn in it.

When I was a student, a certain student theatre would do anything to save or raise money. One day, a couple lads asked the manager if they could book the stage to use as a 'choreography rehearsal space', late morning. Given it wasn't being used for anything else until set-up for the evening show, the manager happily pocketed £50 (about £100 or more now).

Guys turned up, were let into the auditorium. Turned out their idea of 'choreography' was simply fucking in the middle of the empty stage, as someone working on set-building found out when they popped up to the auditorium. Manager's reaction was to ask for another £50 for cleaning costs, and leave them to it (and not just because more than two people in a room with gay sex happening was illegal at the time...)

Last year, got an email asking if we'd been using the AirBnB we'd hired to film porn. Spouse replied that chance would have been a fine thing!
I have several online friends in the UK, one of which is coming to the US shortly to stay with family to get the hell away from there.

Back on topic, there is a large house by where I used to live in Cranston, RI that had this crazy fence around it with an electric gate right near the yacht club, and story is it was once owned by a drug dealer who bankrolled porn and a ton of it was shot there in the 80's.

Currently there's place in Providence, nicknamed the Bullpen where they have gloryholes in the basement for men, but on occasions there are women behind the wall, and rumor is someone is filming some of the action and posting it on clips 4 sale. True? No idea, I"m married and boring these days.
 
Currently there's place in Providence, nicknamed the Bullpen where they have gloryholes in the basement for men, but on occasions there are women behind the wall, and rumor is someone is filming some of the action and posting it on clips 4 sale. True? No idea, I"m married and boring these days.

The existence of gloryholes is the ultimate proof that men will fuck anything.
 
Political tangent removed.

If this becomes a problem, I will start moving the posts to the politics board instead of removing them. So if you don't want to find yourself there, report any political tangents rather than commenting on them.
 
In

India has been fucked up in this regard for a long time and Japanese porn probably doesn’t explain the occurrence of this, there.
I never said it did. I just said that the wave of reports of it happening for real in India made the concept too squicky for me to enjoy.
 
Back
Top