Questions: Reply with a question resumes again.

Pourquoi pas?
And is it not actually bone and cartilage material, not meat, that risks rupture and makes sense of light waves?
 
It seems we're constitutionally unable to constrain ourselves to simple, coherent topics, or am I mistooken?
 
If Jacques Derrida, infamous French philosopher, can spend 3 pages on the fact that sometimes spell words in different ways, surely I can spell stuff different - can’t I?
 
Couldn't you have just chosen to stand behind Roger Daltry and company instead of getting all grammatical?
 
Why did you bring up a question out of left field instead answering my important question?
 
Back
Top