[Sci-fi] Scientific accuracy (and a request for feedback)

I read chapters 1 and 2

Hello. Here's my two cents. Please remember that I'm no expert!
First off, the link to chapter 2 didn't work. I went to chapter 3, then used that to get to chapter 2.
Okay, for a first-time story I'm impressed. Pretty good. The fact that English is not your native tongue...I have to say I'm envious about your ability to write in my native tongue.
I agree with some of the previous posters regarding numbers. That is, numbers work better when introduced to the story casually - such as in a conversation. The A.I.'s use of numbers regarding medication fit well. The brief discussion of 600 kps (?) and a trip of 42 minutes as narration seemed a little forced, at least to me.
I think a lot of good SF authors either have a character describe the physics (velocity, method of propulsion, effects or non-effects of forces, etc.) as part of the story, or leave it out. The duration of the trip matters to the character so it stays in. The speed doesn't matter, unless you as the author give it a reason to matter ("Remember you're coming up on that thing at 600 kps so give yourself plenty of time to slow down!" his uncle warns him).
You can choose to put all the math into the story, and some of my favourite authors have in theirs, but there's a fine balance between providing information and throwing numbers at the reader.
Tenses tended to vary between past and present, at least in chapter 1. There were some other things that a second pair of eyes could help you with.
You did a good job on jumping into the story, and drawing the reader into the tale. From what I've read, you aren't putting a lot of filler in - so the plot moves at a good pace.
One criticism I have is the lack of atmosphere (no pun intended...well, maybe just a little). The science is there, so the reader definitely knows it's science fiction, however you're not really describing the actual physical environment around the character.
Is the ship clean and well-organized, or old and cluttered? You mentioned dust not falling onto anything because there's no gravity (I would argue that static electricity might draw dust to surfaces in zero g, particularly electronic ones), but is the ship dusty? The ship's big (as seen from a km away?), but is it pockmarked with the past impacts of various human and natural space debris? Is the ship new, or old and barely held together? Are we talking 2001 a Space Odyssey, or Firefly? Space 1999, or The Starlost? And what about the space suits? Or the women's fashions on Luna? That would seem to be an inane questions, but it would effect the physics of bouncing which as a guy... And what are the people on the ship wearing? I think the protoganist might be particularly sensitive to what Hannah (and other females) was wearing.
You're getting a lot right, but I think you might be concentrating so much on getting the physics correct that I'm not getting a good feel for the reality of the story. I think most of us won't check your numbers (too lazy!), but for those few who do you'd better make sure they're right!
As I said: just my two cents. I likely won't have time to read any of the other chapters, although it is an easy read (meaning I didn't have to force myself through it). Hope this helps and best of luck!
 
Thank you for your input.

I try to gradually introduce the environment. For example: in chapter 5 I discuss the state of the ship, as well as later on in an upcoming chapter.

I have to admit I learned a lot from this experience, as is evident in the later chapters. (yet to be posted)

I also think you're right about dust. :)

Edit:

More chapters have been posted as well.

Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
 
Last edited:
Hello vWrath.
In your next story you may want to open with a good description of the environment (spaceship, etc.), or at least have one in the first few paragraphs. That may help set not only the tone, but it lets you take short cuts later in your story. More than a few stories I've read begin with a description of the castle, spaceship, library, planet, farmer's field, desert, etc., and then seem to be somewhat less descriptive further on. By that time the reader has already built the story universe in their head, and you likely don't want to jostle them too much.
By doing this, I think you can also add a lot of emotional depth to your story right at the start, which helps suck in the reader. Of course, the danger is in being too descriptive and having your readers lose the plot or just lose interest.
SPOILER! In your case, once the protagonist is out of the VR at the beginning, describing his immediate surroundings could have given a nice contrast to the high tech of the VR, or it could have enhanced the futuristic vision of your tale - whichever you intend.
SF depends largely on your ability to build the universe in the reader's imagination. Whether you go the hard SF route and throw in lots of numbers and actual science (Robert Forward and others), or write soft SF and use more subjective terminology ("it was a three month journey from Terra to Ganymede...") may only matter to a relatively small group of readers. The line between hard and soft SF is blurred in many books, movies, etc.
Hopefully I'll have adequate time in the future to read more of what you wrote/write.
 
To be honest. I was afraid of over-indulging myself.

I can get very descriptive, and I rewrote and removed many details that I found to be superfluous. I may have gone a bit too far now that I think about it.

I'll try to strike a balance between my capacity of detail and what's actually necessary in the future. I hope I don't become too verbose though, I certainly can botch it if I'm not careful.

Thank you for your advice and I hope you can get to read the rest of it and tell me your opinion.
 
Or you could have a propulsion device through alternate realities in which a brace of dogs recreate the universe every time they turn three times in circles, much like a dog to whom you say "sit" and he circles three times and goes to the kitchen to see if there is any food hanging around. He knows what the reality is, but once he turns those circles everything is brand new and all rules are void.
 
Or you could have a propulsion device through alternate realities in which a brace of dogs recreate the universe every time they turn three times in circles, much like a dog to whom you say "sit" and he circles three times and goes to the kitchen to see if there is any food hanging around. He knows what the reality is, but once he turns those circles everything is brand new and all rules are void.

Or a goldfish that resets the universe every time its memory blanks. :D (I know it's a myth but still.)

Oooh, that reminds me. More chapters posted:

Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Chapter 10
Chapter 11
 
I'm not an expert on astronomy or astrophysics, but I slept at a Holiday Inn Express (inside joke).

Your math isn't correct. 600 kilometers per second is 36,000 kilometers per minute and 2,160,000 kilometers per hour.

If the distance left to travel is 25,000 kilometers then it wouldn't be done in 45 minutes but more likely 45 seconds.

I'd look into your stories further but it seems you are already posting your stories in rapid succession so it seems your asking for help is really just a ploy to get people to read your stories.
 
I'm not an expert on astronomy or astrophysics, but I slept at a Holiday Inn Express (inside joke).

Your math isn't correct. 600 kilometers per second is 36,000 kilometers per minute and 2,160,000 kilometers per hour.

If the distance left to travel is 25,000 kilometers then it wouldn't be done in 45 minutes but more likely 45 seconds.

Yes, I messed up a lot of the math at the beginning. I started to work out the math and using actual equations later though.

I'd look into your stories further but it seems you are already posting your stories in rapid succession so it seems your asking for help is really just a ploy to get people to read your stories.

I didn't originally start this thread as a ploy as you suggest. It was a genuine enquiry. The reason I'm more prolific right now is because I'm past the science and into the actual plot. I do a lot less research now at this point and I let my imagination do the rest.

Now that I look at it.. This thread has 481 views in total, whilst my first chapter has 11,696 views on the site. (Don't ask.. I don't even know why. :D)

Thank you for your interest in the thread though.
 
I haven't written a lot but have certainly read a lot of sci-fi. A lot of my personal favorites are written in the 1950s-60s.

Remember that at the heart of any story, whether it's set in the past or the future, there is one constant element. Humans.

Unless you have set the story in the really distant Utopian future we are not likely to change much. Leave room for the seven deadly sins.

Remember also that one of our most back-brain-stem-driven instincts is to hate what is different. Human's can't even get along with themselves.

We are also predatory. We will often, no matter how noble we wish to be seen, take from something weaker than ourselves. If we can get away with it.


Now about the science part. Think about this, you and I are both part of this modern world, here and now. I wouldn't have a conversation with you about how a TV works. How a car, or a plane, or a rocket works. We both would know that information, at least basically. There will be a desire to use dialog to explain the inner-workings of your world.

"That's a Flux9 Capacitor, with a Sequential Flute system. You know that thing can...."

Before long your character will begin to sound like Tim 'the toolman' Taylor.

Keep it simple also works well.

MST


P.S. Something fun you can do is research what people thought in the past and make it modern. That can work very well and make for an interesting story.
 
I haven't written a lot but have certainly read a lot of sci-fi. A lot of my personal favorites are written in the 1950s-60s.

Remember that at the heart of any story, whether it's set in the past or the future, there is one constant element. Humans.

Unless you have set the story in the really distant Utopian future we are not likely to change much. Leave room for the seven deadly sins.

Remember also that one of our most back-brain-stem-driven instincts is to hate what is different. Human's can't even get along with themselves.

We are also predatory. We will often, no matter how noble we wish to be seen, take from something weaker than ourselves. If we can get away with it.

Chapters 15 through 17 talk about this. I don't want to spoil anything for anybody so I won't go into details. Suffice to say, earth is a dystopia in my story.

Now about the science part. Think about this, you and I are both part of this modern world, here and now. I wouldn't have a conversation with you about how a TV works. How a car, or a plane, or a rocket works. We both would know that information, at least basically. There will be a desire to use dialog to explain the inner-workings of your world.

"That's a Flux9 Capacitor, with a Sequential Flute system. You know that thing can...."

Before long your character will begin to sound like Tim 'the toolman' Taylor.

Keep it simple also works well.

MST

Yeah, I learned that lesson the hard way. I try to keep the technical aspect to the theory and how it was applied.

P.S. Something fun you can do is research what people thought in the past and make it modern. That can work very well and make for an interesting story.

Sounds like fun! It works because my character is a walking Tesla coil. :D
 
Chapter 15
Chapter 16
Chapter 17

This concludes the first book. I'd love to see some feedback on the entire story.

The sequel is being written right now. It's called "Jaden's Destiny", and should be out some time in the future.

Thank you.
 
Back
Top