L
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a long-running flamewar. In Texas, I have read, the side you take can have actual political consequences. Some purists insist that while a chili-like substance can be made with beans, chili contains none by definition. But I have read that the practice of including beans in the recipe is almost as old as chili itself.
Yes, it absolutely should.
If you care about your health.
Yes, it absolutely should.
If you care about your health.
Chili is health food?!
you could just eat vegetarian chili.
We lived 23 years in Florida. It's always been red beans.Florida chili is made with black beans. It's a Cuban thing.
Texans eat dead cows cooked way too long
No such thing by definition. It is at most a chili-like substance.
nope. it's real and it's fucking good. you need to work on your definition 'cause it sucks.
Next you will want to leave the milk out of the oyster stew.not really. you just change the con to a sin and it works out great.
You're probably right since I am in that region. I like spaghetti as a chili ingredient myself, but there is a chain restaurant here called "Skyline Chili" which makes the most foul product I've ever eaten. Once and one time only. The most ardent Texas chili fan would praise Wendy's offering as "gourmet" compared to Skyline.
Rancid.
If you want a thread to go on forever, put "let's settle this once and for all" in the title.
Some rather opinionated people in this thread, yessirree.
If I cared about my health I wouldn't eat chili.
We can agree to disagree about politics, religion, and the most basic values of human existence, but this is chili!
Can we add onion and green peppers to the chili?
And what kind of chiles?
I don't want to keep getting this wrong...sniff, sniff