deehere
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2012
- Posts
- 926
Beans have such a deliciously sensual texture, like the soft give of skin of a lover. Beans, beans, beans.
The magical fruit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Beans have such a deliciously sensual texture, like the soft give of skin of a lover. Beans, beans, beans.
I saw the coolest idea on America's Test Kitchen. They added blended up corn chips to their Five Alarm Chili along the lines of what you do. Sounded great.I've actually won a local chili cook off with my chili.![]()
At any rate, I use red kidney beans, not too many though. I've also gotten into using carne asada meat. If I can't find that, I'll ask my supermarket butcher to grind a couple of pounds of Chuck roast through the big holes of the meat grinder. Tons of spices and other shit. It's certainly not a purists chili... But it's fucking good. I also put fritos on and cheese on the bottom of the bowl, pour the chili on top and throw a few spoons of sour cream and a few scallions on top. That's my Midwestern heritage. Overload the shit till it's shopping out of the bowl.
Fuck your beanless chili. Leave that to Hormel.
KingOrfeo's Royal Chili:
... Yuuuge list of ingredients ...
I saw the coolest idea on America's Test Kitchen. They added blended up corn chips to their Five Alarm Chili along the lines of what you do. Sounded great.
The magical fruit
How many armies does all that feed?
I have never tried making chili but this thread is giving me the urge to try.
I never thicken my stew (or chili) with flour. That's what the onions are for, just need to use plenty of it.
*hands you some chili cheese fritos*
#fritolayknowswhatsupyo
Lamb chili (you can't get mutton here) is not unknown in the States, but I never heard of making it with okra.
No, the musical fruit. The more you eat, the more you toot. The more you toot, the better you feel, so eat beans at every meal!
That's it! Tonight we have chili with beans for supper.
Yes, supper not dinner. We had that around lunch time.
Let's not forget the oyster crackers.
How do you have supper at lunchtime? If you eat a meal at noon, you're having lunch.
I have breakfast when I get up which varies since retirement.How do you have supper at lunchtime? If you eat a meal at noon, you're having lunch.
When we ate our nooner meal in Florida it was an hour sooner than we eat now in Illinois.So what time's dinner?
The richer classes have their midday meal at one-thirty in the afternoon and call it “luncheon”. At about half-past four in the afternoon they have a cup of tea and perhaps a piece of bread-and-butter or a slice of cake, which they call “afternoon tea” and they have their evening meal at half-past seven or eight, and call it “dinner”. The others, perhaps ninety percent of the population, have their midday meal somewhat earlier – usually about half-past twelve – and call it “dinner”. They have their main evening meal at about half-past six and call it “tea” and before going to bed they have a light snack – for instance cocoa and bread-and-jam – which they call “supper”. The distinction is regional as well as social. In the North of England, Scotland and Ireland many well-to-do people prefer to follow the working-class time scheme, partly because it fits in better with the working day, and partly, perhaps, from motives of conservation: for our ancestors of a century ago also had their meals at approximately these hours.
<snip>
When one has described the midday meal one has also described, in its broadest outlines, the evening meal of the minority who call that meal “dinner”. Of course luncheon and dinner are not quite the same. Dinner is a more elaborate meal, and would always consist of at least three courses, since it would start with either soup or hors d’oeuvre. But there is no luncheon dish that is definitely not a dinner dish, or vice versa, and the enormously long dinner menus which were fashionable in the nineteenth century have been obsolete for two decades or thereabouts. Even before the war, a fairly elaborate dinner would normally consist of four or at most five courses. Very few meals included more than one meat course, and the practice of eating a “savoury”, usually a preparation of cheese or salt fish, after the sweet, was rapidly going out. On the other hand it is usual to drink more alcohol with the evening meal. Few British people drink much in the middle of the day – for those who drink at all, half a pint of beer would probably be the average – and still fewer drink wine, even if they can afford it. Port wine, traditionally associated with Britain and still imported in considerable quantities, is almost purely an after-dinner drink. Gin is drunk before meals, whisky afterwards. After dinner it is usual to drink one or two small cups of coffee: coffee is drunk after lunch as well, but probably a great majority of British people prefer to end that meal with a cup of tea.
As has been pointed out already, the bulk of the British people call their main evening meal “tea”, not “dinner”, and have it at about half-past six – at any rate, they have it as soon as the bread-winner of the family returns from work. So far as food values go, “tea” is not necessarily very different from “dinner”, but the lay-out of the meal is different. “Tea”, also commonly called “high tea”, is a large, comfortable, informal meal, designed for people who are tired from work and have nothing to eat for six or seven hours. It has to consist, therefore, of something that can be got ready quickly, and it is usual to place all the dishes on the table at once.
Some recipes call for dredging the meat in flour before browning it, but I've never seen the point.
I don't but the point is the browning. The starch in the flour sets off the process of carmelization. Starch just hasn't had those carbohydrate chains broken into sugar.Heat does that.
I learned a slightly diferent technique (for browning meat, not making chili) when I spent a week stranded with some cambodians in Tacoma. A pinch of sugar starts that same process.
What I usually do is I'm caramelizing onions simultaneously and that also accomplishes the same things because onions have sugar in them.
Often, when a recipe calls for dredging in flour, it serves to help thicken the dish.
You are looking for the Maillard reaction when cooking (browning) meat, which when done is for flavour, and depth of flavour. This is achieved when the amino acids and some food sugars change molecularly in the food, when cooked. Using the simple sugars already in the food for the reaction will generate more of that sought after umami flavour, which adds complexity and the desired flavour layers to the finished dish. Music in your mouth, instead of a few notes.
Sometimes the browning that occurs when sugar is added is just the sugar browning / burning, and not the Maillard reaction. That could result in more char, or burning, which can be bitter tasting. The simple sugars in the food are slower to burn because they are surrounded by water, which tempers the heat.
Try a pinch or two of baking soda in the meat before cooking, which will monkey with the PH of the food, and can assist with the Maillard reaction better than added sugar.
How do you have supper at lunchtime? If you eat a meal at noon, you're having lunch.
Exactly. You instead should use thin, crisp restaurant-style, fried, corn, tortilla chips, ladle my chile verde over it, top with cheese and bake. I microwave it. Instant chiliquiles. Somewhere between enchiladas and nschos. Great breakfast.
What about brining?