IrisAlthea
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2008
- Posts
- 5,437
It's not just any old "positive reinforcement" that works best. People say that, but they leave out part of it. It's intermittent positive reinforcement that works best. The quick Google search I did pulled up a bunch of needlessly complicated shit about it, so I've got nothing to link to. But I did get my psych degree at a very behavior-analysis-oriented program, so we got that shit drilled in our heads constantly.
The rat in the Skinner box who's learned that pushing the lever brings food every time will soon stop pushing the lever if it stops getting the food. Continuous positive reinforcement creates behavior that's extinguished quickly. Positive reinforcement that's linked to a time-table or a certain number of times a behavior is performed creates behaviors that are a little harder to extinguish. But truly intermittent reinforcement that's tied to nothing in particular, that happens at random times creates behavioral responses that are very hard to extinguish. The rat will push the lever til he dies, in hopes that this time will be the time.
Of course, humans aren't rats. We aren't rewarded for one specific behavior. So if it's extrapolated to us, then intermittent positive reinforcement is a lot like what OSG and Netz talked about. The "behavior" being rewarded is technically "being a good boy/girl," so it's not totally random. (Nobody's going to stop and hand you a reward for being bad.) But it happens on a random schedule, so you can't predict it, which makes it even more effective at shaping the "good boy/girl" behaviors.
TL;DR Bunny hasn't forgotten everything she learned in college, and she doesn't get out nearly enough.
And everyone who has seen people standing at those gambling machines or buying those lottery tickets where you can win small sums or new lottery tickets relatively often, knows lot of humans will keep pushing that lever too.