bronzeage
I am a river to my people
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2005
- Posts
- 49,685
really? you said you'd posted lots of stories AND poems. so what you mean is "I cannot post THIS poem"
as for the rest, your cliquish references, well that's just a crock of shit and we know it. post count has nothing at all to do with how we view another writer's talents. you could be a virgin or multi-published, makes no odds to me at all - i address each write as i find it. and yes, you do seem to have an inflated opinion of your own creations - fine, but accept not everyone will share that.
i like most people here, and even those i don't i tend to be able to communicate with civility.
enjoy writing elsewhere
=========
Thank you! I might!
And the idea that there is not a clique going on here is the most absurd thing I've seen posted here in the last few days. There is a small group that closes rank and gangs up on anyone who has the audacity to disagree with their well established wisdom and experience. The LillyRose poem is certainly an example. And how you could have the gall to almost demand that she thank you for a rotten bit of reviewing is beyond my view.
There is no clique here? Bronzeage contributes all kinds of snide comments during my thread, calling me a pouter etc. He says all these things about a poem HE HASN"T EVEN READ. When I give back you come on and tell me I'm being rude to him. TwelveOne posts a poem which seems to be sarcastically copying the style that I used in mine and BronzeAge practically has an orgasm describing the genius of the write. LillyRose bites back after TwelveOne's obnoxious review and you jump in saying TwelveOne belongs on Olympus.
There is no clique here? Please!
".......your cliquish references, well that's just a crock of shit and we know it. post count has nothing at all to do with how we view another writer's"
Yes, "WE know it"....exactly, you said it perfectly.
And another thing: Your quoting technique is irritating.
If there is a clique on this forum, the standards for admission must be incredibly low, if I am included.
I am one of those people who lacks a formal education, so I am at a disadvantage when asked to give a score based on technical points and form. I am able to read, so poems are judged by the effect they have.
This week, I reviewed both 12:01's and Lilly's poem. The first came up on my regular day and the second was by request. I will not go hunt a poem down. I gave 12:01 and Lilly favorable comments.
If there is a clique on this forum, the standards for admission must be incredibly low, if I am included.
As 12:01 and I seem to disagree about Lilly's poem, we may have to form a sub-clique, but there is some minimum quorum for a clique, and on any day this forum lacks enough reads to form a quartet.
Between Koba and Lily, there has been more posting in the past few days than we get in a month. I thank both of you for this.
Let us not forget. This is poetry, the bastard stepchild of literature. Outside of our small circle, no one cares. So, look around the room. This is the audience for poetry, other poets. If a poet can't get along with other poets, he/she will be a very lonely little boy/girl. Cat fights over what someone said about someone else's poem are pointless to the point of creating some kind of negative number far beyond zero.
Take a look around and make a quick count of how many poems make it to a paper based publication, which actually pays for the work. Calculate the number of poems produced everyday by poets who are certain it might be their best work yet, and then suppose poems were published by a lottery. We could all win the Powerball and retire to an artist's colony before a single line made it to a back page of the New Yorker (this does not include any submissions to Chicken Soup for the whateverthefuckitisthisweek Soul).
We can just calm down. There is nothing at stake here. Not money, not reputations, not ego, nothing. It's not worth hard feelings and bruised hearts, just because somebody didn't love your work, or mine.