This SOB Deserves A Military Tribunal And A Firing Squad

[Rightguide]

They do what they're told.

No, they tell the thousands below them what to do. There's a reason why employees in agencies like the EPA, DOJ, the State Department, are reported by the government to give 95% of the campaign donations to Democrats. The are not apolitical, they are partisans and they govern, slow walk, ignore, adjudicate, and stonewall, cover-up, and conspire, like partisans as well.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

NEWS
COUP: General Milley Secretly Pledged to Warn Chinese Communist Party if Trump Planned a Strike.
Excerpts from the new Bob Woodward book reveal a partisan coup at the heart of the U.S. government.

Through secret backchannels unbeknownst to then-President Donald Trump, General Mark Milley informed leaders from the Chinese Communist Party and Democratic Party that he would not carry out “any kind” of military action ordered by Trump.

The revelations represent a stunning admission of an effective coup d’etat at the top of the U.S. government, with U.S. officials colluding with the Chinese Communist Party in order to limit Donald Trump’s powers.


General Milley – who controversially defended teaching Marxist “critical race theory” in the military – telephoned his Chinese Communist Party counterpart, General Li Zuocheng, twice in the final months of the Trump administration.

Milley’s calls – according to Bob Woodward’s and Robert Costa’s new book entited Peril – were aimed at restricting the President of the United States’ abilities to wage kinetic war against China. Stunningly, Milley even secretly pledged to inform Beijing ahead of any potential U.S. military action.

“General Li, you and I have known each other for now five years. If we’re going to attack, I’m going to call you ahead of time. It’s not going to be a surprise,” he added. “Li took the chairman at his word,” The Washington Post notes.

More treason here involving Milley and Pelosi:

https://thenationalpulse.com/news/c...se-communist-party-if-trump-planned-a-strike/

He was smart enough to see that trump was a moron. Good for him.

 

[pecksniff]

There's a reason why employees in agencies like the EPA, DOJ, the State Department, are reported by the government to give 95% of the campaign donations to Democrats.

I don't believe that for a moment. The Dems could win no elections if civil servants accounted for 95% of their funding.

 

[zipman]

Fuck off dipshit, you are a disgusting wimp. Trump would have done no such thing. Milley is no better than an enemy agent. Who knows what else he told his favorite CCP General. We need an investigation but we won't get it from the CCP functionary, you voted for, sitting in the White House right now.

Bwahaha. You're a unhinged as Trump is.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Bwahaha. You're a unhinged as Trump is.

I'm pretty sure you knew that, prior to now........*chuckles*

 

[zipman]

I'm pretty sure you knew that, prior to now........*chuckles*

He was always a stupid partisan. But now he's a full-fledged lunatic.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

He was always a stupid partisan. But now he's a full-fledged lunatic.

Yup, he's gone full on imbecile. Nothing he says should be believed and it should be ridiculed.

 

[AlterErgo]

 

[Rightguide]

I don't believe that for a moment. The Dems could win no elections if civil servants accounted for 95% of their funding.

Google the numbers, they are required to be reported by each agency of the federal government by law.

 

[Rightguide]

Now you know he should be shot.

 

[AlterErgo]

Is Gen. Milley allowed to have high-level conversations like this without informing the president? I’m just recalling that the FBI went after Gen. Flynn for a phone call with the Russian ambassador. The claim was they Flynn may have violated the Logan Act by carrying out his own foreign policy. Granted the Logan Act has never really been enforced, but does that same scrutiny apply here?

 

[pecksniff]

Google the numbers, they are required to be reported by each agency of the federal government by law.

Oh, no! You make the assertion, you bring the cite!

 

[LincolnDuncan]

Big balls on Milley

Thank you Sir for your courage under fire

 

[Rightguide]

Oh, no! You make the assertion, you bring the cite!

I already posted them a couple of years ago in the middle of the attack on Trump. Look them up yourself. Off hand here is one source:

https://thehill.com/homenews/campai...shun-trump-give-big-money-to-clinton-campaign

 

[pecksniff]

I already posted them a couple of years ago in the middle of the attack on Trump. Look them up yourself. Off hand here is one source:

https://thehill.com/homenews/campai...shun-trump-give-big-money-to-clinton-campaign

That says government workers gave money to the Clinton campaign, not that the party derives 95% of its funding from such sources, which is a preposterous proposition.

 

[Rightguide]

National Review on the likelihood of Trump striking China as Milley allegedly claims:

NR PLUS NATIONAL SECURITY & DEFENSE
Trump’s Military Record Makes Milley’s Reported Intervention Even More Alarming
By DAVID HARSANYI
September 16, 2021 6:30 AM
Despite his bluster, the former president did not act like a trigger-happy leader eager for needless conflict abroad.


In their forthcoming book Peril, Bob Woodward and Robert Costa reportedly detail two alleged phone calls made by General Mark Milley in the final days of the Trump administration. In them, the Joint Chiefs chairman allegedly assured his Chinese counterparts that if Donald Trump decided to attack, he would give them a heads-up. If true, the most serious problem isn’t the calls themselves, but rather that Milley conducted his own foreign policy and arrogated civilian authority over the military, one of the most vital checks on power in a free republic.

As Dan McLaughlin noted, former defense secretary Mark Esper might also have been pulling strings here. Regardless, Milley, who is neither an elected official nor a psychiatrist, should explain how Trump’s alleged “mental decline” after the election convinced him that he must allay the fears of a communist dictatorship about his own democratically elected government.

Despite his bellicose rhetoric and bluster, Trump had probably been more reluctant to use military force than any president in memory. One of the few (somewhat) consistent political positions held by the former president has been a distaste for military engagement. As others have pointed out, Trump was the first president since Jimmy Carter not to have gotten the nation into a new military conflict. One might chalk that up to the luck of history and circumstance — if it weren’t for more concrete examples.

In the summer of 2019, after Iranians shot down an American surveillance drone, Mike Pompeo and John Bolton — and other members of his national-security team — reportedly implored the president to launch a strike on Iranian soil as a show of strength. The administration even settled on three missile batteries and radar sites as targets, activating 10,000 sailors and airmen as a precursor to Tomahawk cruise-missiles strikes. Officials told Trump that there would be 150 Iranian casualties — an estimate that was derived from the number of “operators, maintenance personnel, and security guards” usually on site. The president reportedly thought that number too high a price in response to a nonlethal attack. His “stunned” and “flabbergasted” advisers — these are the New York Times’ words — warned that pulling back was a mistake. That doesn’t sound like a guy, for all his faults, who would launch nukes for kicks.

There would have likely been no political downside in hitting the Iranian terror regime. And if Trump didn’t move forward because he was nervous that the country would fall into another conflict, then he was weighing options seriously. A few months later, the United States would assassinate Qasem Soleimani and nine of his Iraqi and Iranian cohorts. That was a high-impact strike with limited casualties. At the time, the usual suspects warned of imminent bloody conflict, but the reaction was only some impotent Iranian attacks meant for domestic theater.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2021...eys-reported-intervention-even-more-alarming/

 

[pecksniff]

National Review as a source. Better than Breitbart, but, still . . .

 

[Rightguide]

The real truth is General Milley, the Speaker of the House, and those officers who agreed with Milley to thwart Trump's chain of command, were attempting a coup. If the facts of the Woodward book are true, all involved need to be put on the box and investigated for a number of federal felonies.

 

[Rightguide]

National Review as a source. Better than Breitbart, but, still . . .

Better than anything you can come up with.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Milley saw how unhinged and irrational trump was being after his humiliating loss to president biden. Nobody except a trumptard could disagree that trump was acting like a retarded version of klownguide after his pummelling.
In this circumstance I think it was wise to let other nations know that someone who is level headed will control the situation.
Trump is still crying like a little bitch about it.

 

[pecksniff]

Better than anything you can come up with.

The Nation, Mother Jones, In These Times, Alternet, Salon -- any of those would be better.

 

[ll74]

When a joint chief of staff finds a reason to do this much to prep for a possible action by the President, it makes you question what he knew that we didn't.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Better than anything you can come up with.

You should use a link to the original qanon website
4chan/b

 

[pecksniff]

The real truth is General Milley, the Speaker of the House, and those officers who agreed with Milley to thwart Trump's chain of command, were attempting a coup. If the facts of the Woodward book are true, all involved need to be put on the box and investigated for a number of federal felonies.

Well, they weren't planning to shoot or arrest Trump and replace him with Pence or anybody else.

 

[CornusKousa]

Well, they weren't planning to shoot or arrest Trump and replace him with Pence or anybody else.

That doesn't make what they did any less adjacent to treason.