Last I saw he was down in Lit Chat Support looking for Moderator. What does he need a Mod for,doesn't he have the ear of God?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Last I saw he was down in Lit Chat Support looking for Moderator. What does he need a Mod for,doesn't he have the ear of God?
No mention of Bacon what so ever, just a heap of opinion passed off as fact.I was hoping you would ask... Been compiling on Docs so I can give you a list of what all of them said about God, creation, and scientific method...
Isaac Newton (1642-1726/27) was an English polymath and key figure in the Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment who believed that science and faith were intertwined. His theism and science influenced each other in several ways:
- God's power
- Newton believed that the universe was a manifestation of God's infinite power, and that God intervened in the world and history. For example, he believed God prevented the stars from falling into each other and may have prevented the universe's motion from decaying due to friction.
- Nature and scripture
- Newton believed that God wrote both the Book of Nature and the Book of Scripture, and that the knowledge revealed in each was harmonious. He also believed that nature and scripture both displayed divine simplicity.
- Science as a portal
- Newton believed that science was a way to access God's mind, and that his study of the natural world was motivated by his belief in a Creator who created the world in an orderly way. For example, he believed that physics showed how God set up the world, while scripture and prophecy showed how God acted in history.
Robert Boyle (1627—1691) was a Christian scientist who believed that science and religion could coexist and support each other. His faith motivated his scientific work, and he saw studying nature as a religious duty. Boyle was a pioneer in combining natural theology, the idea that God's attributes can be seen in the natural world, with empirical scientific inquiry. He believed that conflicts between science and the Bible were due to mistakes in science or incorrect interpretations of scripture. Boyle also praised God for his scientific discoveries and encouraged others to do the same.
Boyle's views on science and religion were presented in his lectures and writings, and they influenced others long after his time. His work helped to establish a connection between Christian faith and experimental science.
https://creation.com/francis-bacon
Charles Babbage (1791-1871), known as the father of the computer, was an Anglican Christian who believed that science and the Bible were compatible. He believed that scientific methods could be used to better understand and interpret the Bible, and that the study of nature could help people understand God's wisdom and goodness. Babbage's scientific expertise spanned many fields, and he was also known for his contributions to natural theology and apologetics.
https://answersingenesis.org/creati...-creation-scientists-blaise-pascal-1623-1662/
https://biologos.org/articles/georg...-could-conceive-the-beginning-of-the-universe
https://crev.info/scientists/roger-bacon/
https://answersingenesis.org/creation-scientists/gregor-mendel-no-darwinian/
Here is the actual history of the founders of modern scientific method. What they said they believed. What their bios show them to have believed about Christianity or at least creationism and science. Where I am no using a link, those are AI searches on the subject. Hardly accusable of bias. The others, whether or not you like the sources, are great bios on the men. What you claim and what they said are quite the opposite.
https://creation.com/francis-baconNo mention of Bacon what so ever, just a heap of opinion passed off as fact.
Its almost as if you fail to comprehend what you’re asked, but that’s not the case it’s more that you choose not to.
And it STILL has nothing to do with what I asked for.https://creation.com/francis-bacon
Since you missed the link on him somehow. And there are several easily followed up on citations throughout the article. You're welcome.