Types of commenters

The Fluffer-These folks are not readers, nor are they authors commenting on other authors stories* (but see the footnote below). This individual replies to every single comment their story receives and by doing so falsely pads their stats and pushes them up into the recent activity searches. You see a story that has 40 comments and you think wow, then you go and see twenty are theirs.

*-This type at times also benefits from the forum fiver and by the time those and the authors comments are removed the total of organic comments is far less than the overall total.
 
Love this thread.

The 'Bless you, little woman.'
Usually nitpicks on typo's, proofreading or story mechanics (usually angry at funny female characters).
Tells me that he understands I'm trying my best with my little woman brain, but can't let my errors go unpunished. He is obligated, no, duty bound, to point them out.

Will then message separately to offer proofreading services and cock. :rolleyes:

Xx
 
Love this thread.

The 'Bless you, little woman.'
Usually nitpicks on typo's, proofreading or story mechanics (usually angry at funny female characters).
Tells me that he understands I'm trying my best with my little woman brain, but can't let my errors go unpunished. He is obligated, no, duty bound, to point them out.

Will then message separately to offer proofreading services and cock. :rolleyes:

Xx
Do I have to manslpain mansplaining?😆

And of course, you're a woman (presumably) so of course you want the D being offered. You're writing erotica so you must not be getting laid.

Seems simple and reasonable🙄
 
Love this thread.

The 'Bless you, little woman.'
Usually nitpicks on typo's, proofreading or story mechanics (usually angry at funny female characters).
Tells me that he understands I'm trying my best with my little woman brain, but can't let my errors go unpunished. He is obligated, no, duty bound, to point them out.

Will then message separately to offer proofreading services and cock. :rolleyes:

Xx
Also known to offer to write your story for you while you make him a sammitch and be sure you're barefoot while you do it.
 
Love this thread.

The 'Bless you, little woman.'
Usually nitpicks on typo's, proofreading or story mechanics (usually angry at funny female characters).
Tells me that he understands I'm trying my best with my little woman brain, but can't let my errors go unpunished. He is obligated, no, duty bound, to point them out.

Will then message separately to offer proofreading services and cock. :rolleyes:

Xx
Where do such people get the time? And don’t they realise they’re simply exposing their own limitations 😂
 
4-The Nitpicker.-This person will read a 20k story and find the tiniest detail to point out. No mention of the story being good, nothing positive discussed, the comment will be "You mentioned the car having this sized motor, but in reality that model only had that engine in 1966 but you said it was in 1968 which is factually incorrect.
It's sexy when Marisa Tomei does it though.
 
The Humourless Commenter - I might be an unusual writer in that I try to get readers to laugh in the stories I post here. And while humour is of course subjective and arguably one of the hardest genres to write, I've been amazed at how many readers seem to lack any sense of humour at all, and in fact seem to see my attempts to make them laugh as an act of provocation. Its actually amusing in itself how humourless some readers are.
 
The Soliloquy/TLDR-The person who leaves a comment longer than some stories here. They go on and on about their thoughts on the story and in great detail and at times meander into other directions. I've gotten a couple of these so long I pasted them into a word doc to see what the word count was and there's been a few that topped 1k

This person is the polar opposite of the "That's it?" type
 
"Ohh, that's so cool you got a degree in zoology! Did you get it because you love animals and want to help protect endangered species?"
"Uhm, well, actually, I got it because I wanted to elevate my writing.."
"Oh! So you're an author, huh? Interesting. What do you write? Books? What genre?"
"It's, uh, it's complicated..."
Get out of my brain!
 
The Soliloquy/TLDR-The person who leaves a comment longer than some stories here. They go on and on about their thoughts on the story and in great detail and at times meander into other directions. I've gotten a couple of these so long I pasted them into a word doc to see what the word count was and there's been a few that topped 1k

This person is the polar opposite of the "That's it?" type
I believe you, but don't want to know😂. That's way more effort than it's gotta be worth. You'd think there'd be some sort of understanding of where we're at. It's Literotica people!

Although since I was StacNashed, no comment yet, been a few days, my story was put in the 1⭐file. Anyway I read a few of her reviews; very long winded. I just wonder what the point is in any of it?
 
Also known to offer to write your story for you while you make him a sammitch and be sure you're barefoot while you do it.
Now I'm hungry, thanks. *Sighs* I'll holler at the wife to get up and make me food. So much trouble to go thru, sitting on the couch and hollering. Tough life being a manly man, such a heavy burden.
 
The "I'll Take Over From Here" commenter:

"Great story. I really see this going in this direction..." - proceeds to outline an entire sequel despite you having put a definitive ending on it.

I've been calling them 'Back Seat Writers'. Most of the time they annoy me, but one commentor was brainstorming different ways the male character in my femdom story could be more valuable without betraying himself, so I straight up jacked one of the ideas they left. Now Danny has a weight set. But most of them are like, "Hey, instead of Gay stuff or Cuck stuff, how about Don't Do That! It should go like this."

And to be transparent, I've deleted many of those "I'll take over from here" comments.
 
The Fluffer-These folks are not readers, nor are they authors commenting on other authors stories* (but see the footnote below). This individual replies to every single comment their story receives and by doing so falsely pads their stats and pushes them up into the recent activity searches. You see a story that has 40 comments and you think wow, then you go and see twenty are theirs.

*-This type at times also benefits from the forum fiver and by the time those and the authors comments are removed the total of organic comments is far less than the overall total.
An example of which has recently made itself known.
 
After the relative success of this topic, I think that two more should follow.

1. Types of Lit authors.

2. Types of AHers.

Who has the balls, and the patience to do it?!

*Cue The Twilight Zone theme*
 
The TMI-This person isn't satisfied with simply saying your story is hot, they have to go into detail about what it made them do. They'll tell you how hard it made them, wet it made them, how they jacked/jilled off, went and took their partner for a wild ride...I received one that stated, "Your story managed to coax two loads from these eighty year old balls"
 
Two more, both quite similar:

"I hate everything about this story, even though it is obvious what it is about." I'm not sure if some of these commenters are trolls just wanting a reaction, but sometimes you get negative comments about the content of stories that is obvious by title, description and tags. For example, an Incest Taboo story titled 'My Hot Kiwi Cousin Has Great Feet' with a description of 'Aussie guy loves his pretty NZ cousin's bare feet' and tags of 'Cousins', 'Australia', 'New Zealand' and 'Feet' attracts a comment to the effect that the reader doesn't like stories set in Australia or New Zealand or with Australian and NZ characters, doesn't like foot fetish stories and doesn't like cousins stories considering them not to be proper incest. Seriously?

"I Hate Imaginative Stories" - Some writers have more imagination than others. Some readers have more imagination than others. But if you simply want a generic story about people having sex with limited character background and plot development there are plenty of these already, why be negative about stories with unusual plots? Taboo-Incest is worst for this by a long way. The reader may not like or be interested in a story where a mother exasperated by her slacker gamer sons is sucked into the video game they are playing with them; a gay male couple driving with their adopted daughter through an eerie forest late at night when they get lost and suddenly both are overcome by desire for the daughter; or a brother and sister who slip back in time to the 1950s, but evidently the author has really used his/her imagination to write something different. Is it really necessary to comment that the story is 'boring'?
 
"I Hate Imaginative Stories" - Some writers have more imagination than others. Some readers have more imagination than others. But if you simply want a generic story about people having sex with limited character background and plot development there are plenty of these already, why be negative about stories with unusual plots?

That is the most awesomest comment evar!!

But all so many of those unimaginative cookie cutter porn stories score incredibly highly. So indeed, the majority of the readers out there are not interested in your inspired twisty plot. Just whack them over the head with a unicorn eagerly delivering their expected kink fantasy.
 
Back
Top