Women: Slow passionate or Rough hard sex?

There's a time and place for both, just depends on mood. I'm 29. And I guess it depends how well I know the guy, I don't want anything so intimate from someone I don't know well, but that doesn't mean I want hard an animalistic either, I find doggy perfect for one offs since I can imagine anyone back there I like.
 
There's a time and place for both, just depends on mood. I'm 29. And I guess it depends how well I know the guy, I don't want anything so intimate from someone I don't know well, but that doesn't mean I want hard an animalistic either, I find doggy perfect for one offs since I can imagine anyone back there I like.

I always wondered what you were thinking about!
 
There are times when slow and passionate are key but then there are times when all I want is to be fucked. Hard. Rough. :devil:
 
Give me a little bit of A, a little bit of B and a lot of C(uddling) and we will be on out way to a great friendship.
 
Sex of all different kinds is great, it's good to mix it up and try different things. I love a really passionate slow sensual encounter, but it is also incredibly horny to be taken roughly. Just depends on the mood of the moment.
 
Good question.

Women, would you rather have a lover provide slow passionate sensual sex or rough animalistic hard sex?

Please answer with your age since I think it might make a difference.

Also, if married, does it make a difference if you are with your husband or other lover?

I'm a senior gentleman who wants to please the women in my life. Thanks.

It really depends on the day, for me, I have only been involved with intercourse with my husband, somedays I want to jump his bones, and get out the flogger and have a wee bit of fun, then and my only dildo and have rough fun and tumble. On ther days, I want soft and slow and romantic, with slow massage and all.
 
Last edited:
Here? anyone?

This is a great old abandoned thread on a delicious topic.

Where is everyone?

Come speak!

You still here on this old abandoned thread?

Gabriel
 
maybe its because im still new, but rough sex hurts to much, it doesn't have to be passionate, but slow.
 
If I could only have one ever again I would go with slow and passionate, otherwise a little variety is appreciated.
 
Gotta have dat passion. Passion can be slow or fast through depending on the moment.
 
I thoroughly enjoy a slow love making session.... Once He has made me too sore to acquiesce to anything more than that!!!! Variety is the spice~though I prefer my spice to drive things up a notch (or ten!!) *sigh* This boredom of singularity is going to be the death of me~I really must stop torturing myself with the hedonism I crave that is now found only on these pages!! I am 36 by the way :). Someone else stated that You seem to be a thoughtful lover and that that will steer You right.... They're absolutely correct!! Best wishes!!
 
I do enjoy a mixed session. The trick is not doing one for too long..nothing worse than making the build up too long and just as the rough and ready starts to feel awesome, its over :(

Close second is the sessions that never seem to end. Nice in theory but hours of sex is just sore

Im in my 20s
 
There are times I want the passion, then there are times that I just want him to fuck me to no end and take what is rightfully his. :D
 
Late thirties. fuck me hard. spank me, handcuff me to something and throw me around like a rag doll...But please no slow and passionate! It annoys the hell out of me. I am not sure why.
 
Mid 40s.

Sometimes I just want to be ravaged, my clothes ripped from me, a fast pounding as he just rams it in and out of me. Others I want the slow seduction, the slow entry into me. It depends on the mood, the man, the situation.
 
I'm 23, and it depends on my mood. I've only ever had sex with my boyfriend, though, and I will say this;

I cannot cyber with someone without at least some form of romance/foreplay/communication first.

I think rough sex requires more trust in general, though.
 
Back
Top