Angeline
Poet Chick
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2002
- Posts
- 27,174
thenry said:It's funny you mention it that way. I find that I only read trash for pleasure, to lose a rainy afternoon. There are criteria involved, like writing skills, but the book usually doesn't *say* anything. I save the good books and authors for when I have the time because I am challenged to do more than passively read. I do have to analyze and search and think about what is being said by the author instead of what is being said by the characters, as well as the statement of the book as a product of its time and place in culture. And. And.
It could be that this process is what you mean by engaging, and if so I wanted only to clarify.
I think we are taking different routes to the same destination.
I will read something I love over and over and over. I'll search out information about the writer, think about the piece in terms of my formal training in literature, try to learn all I can to create a context, have a broader understanding of what I read.
When I actually read the poem though all that metacognitive stuff is not happening in tandem with me experiencing the language and imagery of the writing. I suppose it is subconsciously but, for me, to be aware of that as I read would kill the joy of feeling the poem as art--if that makes sense.