"E" doesn't apply to women, so.....

[Svak]

ladies, this is a call to see who can post the most daring, arousing, blatently sexual close up "genitals or pubic area" picture! I dare you to show the best of what you have


and, yes...this is in direct response to the forum mod who posts a completely sexist rule as a sticky, then locks it so there can't be a discussion, so I'm discussing here along with the pic request, for lack of a better place.



I can't for the life of me figure out why any pic containing my cock must automatically be considered lascivious?

las·civ·i·ous
–adjective

1. inclined to lustfulness; wanton; lewd
2. arousing sexual desire: lascivious photographs.
3. indicating sexual interest or expressive of lust or lewdness

I mean, I'm flattered if you mean any pic of my dick must fall under definition #2! But then are you saying a close up of a swollen, wet pussy is not arousing in a sexual way? To that I would have to very strongly disagree! Heck, I get a little swollen myself just thinking about it (ooops, is that more descriptive then I'm allowed to be about my dick? )
If you mean to say that any picture with male genitalia is automatically lewd, well then I take offense to that as well.

The rules can't be both ways, depending on whether it's a picture that one person (the moderator) wants to see or not. If it's permissable for women, then it must be for men as well.



And before anyone points out the fact that the suggested remedy is to host on another site and link to it instead of uploading it....well, I'm not going to steal bandwidth from another server just because someone can't be impartial to the gender of the subject in the picture in question.



Thoughts, opinions and pics, let's see 'em!

 

[ShyGuy68]

Do you think the moderators don't have anything else to do than go through all the pics here on lit? Well let me tell you, they do! I'm a former moderator, and I know it's impossible to look at every picture that's posted, and it's not required by the site owners either.

So if you see any pictures that you find violate the forum rules, feel free to use the "report post" function, and a moderator will look at the post.

 

[Svak]

it's quite obvious that you were a mod your self, you read that entire post, completely missed the point of it, then responded with something that didn't help one bit.

i don't expect a mod to be able to check every pic or even random pics in every thread, and i never said i did expect that. what i am saying is this mod has screwed up by saying any cock pic is automatically againt rules....which isn't right. that's blatent discrimination between the two genders. if a cock just being in the pic, regardless of what's happening in it, is considered lascivious, then wouldn't the same be true of having a pussy in any pic? that's my point, that the rules that this person is judging by are not fair or balanced.

and i'd appreciate if this was moved back to the forum i originally posted in, i did request pics after all....and I try following forum rules which state we shouldn't be posting pics in this sub forum. thank you.

 

[theweescotsman]

The new guy has a point, the Am Pics Moderator posted a sticky at the top of am pics stating NO COCK PICS, now I always believed that was never the intent of the pic posting guidelines.....if it now is it should be stated clearly......not with all this confusion....I just had to delete half my pics....most of which in no way way did I feel broke the rules, but now with this new sticky each and every pic of a male organ is breaking the rules.......in america are some of the most famous works of art in the world considered offensive....

 

[Svak]

thanks for the support weescotsman

I'm surprised there isn't more support, considering the number of complaints I've read about this same topic in individual threads. maybe if it hadn't been moved

 

[RawHumor]

I have to agree with ShyGuy here. The moderator's thread was probably in response to something he had seen... a trend maybe. Or maybe in response to the abundance of cock avatars. You don't really see a pussy avatar (I think I've maybe seen 2 in my entire time at Lit).


However, a close-up twat shot IS considered against the rules. If there is a finger or toy in it, then it's definitely against the rules.

I don't like that, but it is what it is.

 

[RawHumor]

Also, the presence of a cock in a pic isn't automatically against the rules (I don't believe), but if it's the focus of the shot or if it's erect, then there is a judgement call to be made on the moderator's part.

There's a difference between being nude and your privates just happen to be a part of that nudity, and a close-up shot of your erection.

 

[Mads]

inclined to lustfulness; wanton; lewd

lewd.

Obscene; indecent.

Thats probably why, imo, its automatically considered la... las... that word.

In britain, on tv at least, you can show cocks providing they aren't erect above a certain angle to the body (I kid you not)

I know it's impossible to look at every picture that's posted,

You say its impossible, but I'm damn well trying to

 

[Svak]

RawHumor: yes, Shyguy has a point, but it's not the point of this topic. The topic here was exactly what you said in your second post...and what you touched on at the end of your first post. I personally don't feel that either type should be banned, but why the witch hunt against male nudity?

My personal experience in the matter came in having an entire thread deleted, then pics taken out of a second thread. But in that second thread, there was a picture where a friends pussy was the only thing in the picture, main focal point, nothing else. then later in that thread there was a picture of myself erect, showing from waist to mid thigh, with a picture of this friend on the tv behind me. tasteful I thought, nothing horribly 'in your face' about it...but that was deleted while the pussy pics stayed......it doesn't get any more obviously biased then that.


I've yet to see anyone actually provide this 'law' that is eluded to that stops it from being allowed, but even that's another topic in and of itself. The main point here is the hypocritical manner in which the site is being handled.


"Also, the presence of a cock in a pic isn't automatically against the rules (I don't believe)"
This is the problem, the moderator is indicating that it is automatically against the rules, without any fine print on the proximity or state of erection. It's this flat out ban that I'm so disgusted with

 

[Missouribiguy]

One of the main reasons I feel the need to leave this board, and therefore site, cause I feel that instead of a more proper adult-orienated system which would allow us to show ourselves, we instead get the cock-block.

Essentially, it's complete bullshit, and shows laziness where the mods are concern.

 

[Svak]

I'm not sure I'd call it laziness, and don't know what you mean about a better system, but that makes me think:

It occurs to me.....you can't see attached pictures unless you are logged in as a member, right? So anyone who would end up seeing any of these pics do so by choice, it's not like there's concern for someone randomly surfing the web stumbling onto an 'offensive' photo here. You have to find the site, browse through the forum, create an account, log in, read the title of the thread, then decide if you want to click the link....if you go through all that, then get offended by seeing a hard cock, that's entirely your own damn fault.

I mean, come on. we're all adult members of an adult forum, geared at material intended to cause arousal, yet we, ummmm, aren't allowed to cause arousal? confusing, no?

 

[Deanwich]

I was a lurker here at Lit for a very long time before I ever decided to post. Hell I even created a new user name because my "lurking" one was stupid LOL!

I never knew the hypocrisy that existed here.

The gender inequality amazes me for starters. women can get away with just about anything as an attachment... men on the other hand= NO COCK! Now granted I understand this is for legal reasons; so yeah I get it, and my beef isn't with that. While I agree with the whole point of this thread my beef is something entirely different.

My thread was automatically deleted because I had a picture of my cock in it. Boom.. gone.. Vanished. Now I have noticed a trend the last few days... If you have a post count of say 500+... your threads aren't deleted. Some guys have had their pics removed and others were simply told to remove the "offensive" pics. talk about inequality! So... not only do the rules NOT apply to both sexes equally; if you have a few posts counted under your name you are also given special treatment. I am very tempted to simply go back to lurking for another 4-5 years in hopes that maybe if this site still exists in that time they will either ease up or actually enforce the rules across the board equally regardless of one's sex or post count

/steps off soap box

 

[lyinaboutitall]

I am fairly new to this, so I don't know alot of what is going on really. But I have an opinion and since I have a big mouth, I am going t spew it on everyone. I found this website by google something sexual in nature...go figure.
Lit has many, many different venues to explore. Chat rooms to talk to people whenever and whatever and how ever you want. So, you are taking to someone who is down right offensive (I am not offended easily BTW), what do you do? you leave the room....duh? Stories for the literally stimulated members...which i am loving, there alot of talented people here...so thank you. Threads that we all start with our questions, concerns, or comments of deviant minds. This website is about SEX so discriminating between pictures of this and that...I think is stupid. And if the mods are to busy to look at every pictures that is posted then why bother worrying the pictures, move onto others things that matter, such as people being stalked for instance. We all want to freedom to express ourselves that is just how we deviants are, and i love being a deviant. And if you are reader, and you come across an image that repulses you some way or another...then please leave and not come back because Lit is for the deviant at heart.

 

[theweescotsman]

I was a lurker here at Lit for a very long time before I ever decided to post. Hell I even created a new user name because my "lurking" one was stupid LOL!

I never knew the hypocrisy that existed here.

The gender inequality amazes me for starters. women can get away with just about anything as an attachment... men on the other hand= NO COCK! Now granted I understand this is for legal reasons; so yeah I get it, and my beef isn't with that. While I agree with the whole point of this thread my beef is something entirely different.

My thread was automatically deleted because I had a picture of my cock in it. Boom.. gone.. Vanished. Now I have noticed a trend the last few days... If you have a post count of say 500+... your threads aren't deleted. Some guys have had their pics removed and others were simply told to remove the "offensive" pics. talk about inequality! So... not only do the rules NOT apply to both sexes equally; if you have a few posts counted under your name you are also given special treatment. I am very tempted to simply go back to lurking for another 4-5 years in hopes that maybe if this site still exists in that time they will either ease up or actually enforce the rules across the board equally regardless of one's sex or post count

/steps off soap box

Well I was one of those who was given a warning and I do have more than 500 posts, and if what you have observed is true then that just stinks....there does appear to be differing rules applied in this latest purge on the male member

 

[Kiwikitty]

To be honest there really isn't any discrimination.
I've had at least 4 or 5 close ups of my vagina/ass be deleted because they were against the rules, and I haven't posted them since.

The moderator noticed that 1 out of 4 guys stuck there "giant wiener" in their avatar and flung it around all kind of threads, and since that was obviously against the rules, there had to be a sticky made almost explaining what the rules really mean.

The reason they do this has to do with legal things I myself don't want to take the time to learn about. But those rules are there for legitimate reasons.

I, for one, find it refreshing finding less cocks and pussys in my face all the time. Full body shots are always the best .

EDIT: @dean
If your thread was thousands of posts long you'd be a lot more upset than if it got deleted at about 200.
It may not be fair but it makes sense, if it's possibly to delete the thread in the beginning, than that is the most efficient way of getting the point across. Mods realize, though, that obliterating a very active and large thread would cause a tumult and warnings are given in that case. If the warnings are not taken into heed, they will delete the thread.

 

[theweescotsman]

To be honest there really isn't any discrimination.
I've had at least 4 or 5 close ups of my vagina/ass be deleted because they were against the rules, and I haven't posted them since.

The moderator noticed that 1 out of 4 guys stuck there "giant wiener" in their avatar and flung it around all kind of threads, and since that was obviously against the rules, there had to be a sticky made almost explaining what the rules really mean.

The reason they do this has to do with legal things I myself don't want to take the time to learn about. But those rules are there for legitimate reasons.

I, for one, find it refreshing finding less cocks and pussys in my face all the time. Full body shots are always the best .

EDIT: @dean
If your thread was thousands of posts long you'd be a lot more upset than if it got deleted at about 200.
It may not be fair but it makes sense, if it's possibly to delete the thread in the beginning, than that is the most efficient way of getting the point across. Mods realize, though, that obliterating a very active and large thread would cause a tumult and warnings are given in that case. If the warnings are not taken into heed, they will delete the thread.

Aye the lassie speaks sense........but I have to object to the comment "giant wiener" ....I wish lol

 

[Kiwikitty]

Aye the lassie speaks sense........but I have to object to the comment "giant wiener" ....I wish lol

You actually only see the huge ones in the avvies though, I swear these guys just google giant dick and make it their av .

 

[daus42]

Well I was one of those who was given a warning and I do have more than 500 posts, and if what you have observed is true then that just stinks....there does appear to be differing rules applied in this latest purge on the male member

I had no warning- simply deleted. A warning would have been appreciated and I could have deleted them myself. I agree with Deanwich about the double standard that exists.

 

[Kiwikitty]

I had no warning- simply deleted. A warning would have been appreciated and I could have deleted them myself. I agree with Deanwich about the double standard that exists.

Find me a bunch of shots trained in on the pussy and then we'll talk about a "double standard".

 

[daus42]

Find me a bunch of shots trained in on the pussy and then we'll talk about a "double standard".

They exist KK- take my word for it......

 

[Kiwikitty]

They exist KK- take my word for it......

Mmm I don't know.
I've been in way more threads than you would imagine.

 

[jnibroc88]

I have seen lots of Vaginas being center of attention. But they are girls. So they are allowed.

 

[Kiwikitty]

I have seen lots of Vaginas being center of attention. But they are girls. So they are allowed.

Sorry but that's bullshit.
I tried it and the pic got removed within 48 hours.
It seems like there are more outraged guys because girls play by the rules more often.

 

[jnibroc88]

Sorry but that's bullshit.
I tried it and the pic got removed within 48 hours.
It seems like there are more outraged guys because girls play by the rules more often.

I will agree that girls post more non-pussy shots than men post cock shots. I won't be the one getting anybodies thread in trouble posting links to non-appropriate women pictures. All is well. The mods just need to find a balance and stick with it.

 

[ShyGuy68]

I have seen lots of Vaginas being center of attention. But they are girls. So they are allowed.

Or it's because hardly anybody report the pussy pics, but people will report the cock pics! The moderators can't view every pic that's posted, and thus they rely on posters reporting pics that are against the rules. If they give a warning or not, well I guess that depends on how much time they have on their hands. There is a warning posted about posting pics that are in violation with the rules, and they might mean that is enough warning. And if they have to PM every poster that post pics that are in violation, and then follow up on the threads, it can take quite a bit of time. And the moderators might not have much time, and they also do it on a volunteer basic.